The Philippine presidency in Southeast Asian perspective: imperiled and imperious presidents but not perilous presidentialism

References

• Abinales, P. C. (1996). The revolution falters: The left in Philippine politics since 1986. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Abinales, P. C. (2006). The withering of Philippine democracy. Current History, 105, 290–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abinales, P. N., & Amoroso, D. J. (2005). State and society in the Philippines. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Arugay, A. A. (2016, October 28). Duterte’s plan to revive Philippine democracy. New Mandala. Retrieved from http://www.newmandala.org/dutertes-plan-revive-philippine-democracy/
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2015). Oligarchic populism, Prabowo Subianto’s challenge to Indonesian democracy. Indonesia (April), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C. M. (2006). The limits of conservative church reformism in the democratic Philippines. In T.-J. Cheng, & D. A. Brown (Eds.), Religious organizations and democratization: Case studies from contemporary Asia (pp. 157–179). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Bello, W. (2016, August 7). The left under Duterte. Jacobin. Retrieved from https://www.jacobinmag.com/ 2016/06/walden-bello-philippines-duterte-dignidad-coalition-akbayan/
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. L. (1982). Prelude to martial law: An examination of pre-1972 Philippine civil-military relations(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Berner, E. (1995). Networks, strategies and resistance: A critique and reformulation of strategic groups analysis. ( Sociology of Development Research Centre Working Paper no. 218). Bielefeld: University of Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• BolongaitaJr., E. P. (1995). Presidential versus parliamentary democracy. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints, 43, 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• BrillantesJr., A. B. (1987). Dictatorship and martial law: Philippine authoritarianism in 1972. Manila: Great Books Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Canoy, R. R. (1984). The counterfeit revolution: The Philippines from martial law to the Aquino assassination. Manila: Philippine Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Cayabyab, M. J. (2016, July 25). Duterte wants federal gov’t with prime minister, president. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/799182/duterte-wants-federal-govt-with-prime-minister-president
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A. (2014). The constitutional foundations of democratic consolidation. APSA Comparative Democratization, 12, 1 and 7.
   Google Scholar
• Cupin, B. (2017, June 23). The fall of the ‘dilawang’ Liberal Party. Rappler. Retrieved from http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/in-depth/173706-liberal-party-duterte-one-year
   Google Scholar
• De Guzman, S. S. (2012, June 18). Political butterflies, The Philippine Star. Retrieved from http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2012-06-18/818137/political-butterflies
   Google Scholar
• Doronila, A. (1985). The transformation of patron-client relations and its political consequences in the postwar Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 16, 99–116. doi: 10.1017/S0022463400012789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressel, B. (2011). The Philippines: How much real democracy? International Political Science Review, 32, 529–545. doi: 10.1177/0192512111417912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. (2005). From linz to tsebelis: Three waves of presidential/parliamentary studies? Democratization, 12, 106–122. doi: 10.1080/1351034042000317989
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-types and democratic performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estrada, J. E. (2015). Interview with the author and Ma.Victoria R. Raquiza, Oct. 1, Manila City Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, H.-D. (1973). Group conflict and class formation in South-East Asia. In H.-D. Evers (Ed.), Modernization in South-East Asia (pp. 108–131). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R. (2016, March 7). Balimbing flavor of political season. The Philippine Star. Retreived from http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/03/07/1560412/balimbing-flavor-political-season
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, F. (2015). The political development of modern Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fionna, U., & Tomsa, D. (2017). The effects of historical legacies and institutional engineering (ISEAS Working Papers, no. 1). Singapore: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fossati, D. (2016). The resilience of partisan affiliations in Indonesia. ISEAS Perspective, 52, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuoka, Y. (2015). Demystifying ‘people power’: An elite interpretation of ‘democratization’ in Southeast Asia. In W. Case (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Southeast Asian democratization (pp. 85–101). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F., Dressel, B., & Chang, B.-S. (2005). Challenge and change in East Asia: Facing the perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 16, 102–116. doi: 10.1353/jod.2005.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (2004). Exploring the new roles of the Philippine military: Implications to civilian supremacy. Philippine Political Science Journal, 25, 107–130. doi: 10.1080/01154451.2004.9754259
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, E.-L. E. (2001). The spectre of populism in Philippine politics and society: Artista, masa, eruption. Southern Eastern Asia Research, 9, 5–44. doi: 10.5367/000000001101297306
   Google Scholar
• Hedman, E.-L. E. (2006). In the name of civil society: From free election movements to people power in the Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. (2015). Thailand: Contestation over elections, sovereignty and representation. Representation, 51, 51–62. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2015.1011459
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K. (2017). Reluctant populists: Learning populism in Thailand. International Political Science Review, 38, 426–440. doi: 10.1177/0192512117692801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. (in press). Party and party system institutionalization in the Philippines. In E. V. C. Batalla, & M. R. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of the contemporary Philippines, 38–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R. D. (in press). Pork transmorgrified: The unending story of particularistic spending in the Philippines. In E. V. C. Batalla, & M. R. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of the contemporary Philippines, 97–106. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R. D., & Thompson, M. R. (2017, June 30). Duterte’s year of sound and fury. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2017/06/dutertes-year-of-sound-and-fury/
   Google Scholar
• Jerusalem, J., & Ramos, M. (2016, August 9). Duterte warns Sereno: Get out of my way or it’s martial law. Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/804635/duterte-warns-sereno-get-out-of-my-way-or-its-martial-law
   Google Scholar
• Kasuya, Y. (2005). Patronage of the past and future: Legislators’ decision to impeach president Estrada of the Philippines. The Pacific Review, 18, 521–540. doi: 10.1080/09512740500338994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasuya, Y. (Ed.). (2013). Presidents, assemblies and policy-making in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntz, P., & Thompson, M. R. (2009). More than the final straw: Stolen elections as revolutionary triggers. Comparative Politics, 41, 253–272. doi: 10.5129/001041509X12911362972151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landé, C. H. (2001). The return of ‘people power’ in the Philippines. Journal of Democracy, 12, 88–102. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. (1994). Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? In J. J. Linz, & A. Valenzuela (Eds.), The crisis of presidential democracy: The Latin American evidence (pp. 3–87). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. S. (1997). Juan Linz, presidentialism, and democracy: A critical appraisal. Comparative Politics, 29, 449–471. doi: 10.2307/422014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manasca, R. C., & Tan, A. (2005). Manufacturing parties: Re-examining the transient nature of Philippine political parties. Party Politics, 11, 748–765. doi: 10.1177/1354068805057608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCargo, D. (2005). Network monarchy and legitimacy crises in Thailand. The Pacific Review, 18, 499–519. doi: 10.1080/09512740500338937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. (1988). Quezon’s commonwealth: The emergence of Philippine authoritarianism. In R. R. Paredes (Ed.), Philippine colonial democracy (pp. 114–160). New Haven: Yale University Southeast Asian Studies Monograph Series.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. (Ed.). (1994). An anarchy of families: State and family in the Philippines. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, D. J. (2010). Democracy and the Philippine congress. In Political science department, Ateneo de Manila university, Philippine politics: Democratic ideals and realities (pp. 97–140). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M. (2009, May). Indonesia’s 2009 elections: Populism, dynasties and the consolidation of the party system. Analysis: The Lowry institute for international policy. Sydney: The Lowry Institute for International Policy. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/100187/Mietzner_0509LowyAnalysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M. (2014). Indonesia’s 2014 election: How Jokowi won and democracy survived. Journal of Democracy, 25, 111–125. doi: 10.1353/jod.2014.0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M. (2017). Technocrats, islamists and ultranationalists: Competing populisms in democratic Indonesia. Abstract of a paper to be presented at the association of asian studies (AAS) annual conference, Washington, DC, 22–25 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mietzner, M., & Aspinall, E. (2010). Problems of democratisation in Indonesia: An overview. In E. Aspinall, & M. Mietzner (Eds.), Problems of democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, institutions, and society (pp. 1–20). Singapore: ISEAS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5, 55–69. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0010
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9, 112–126. doi: 10.1353/jod.1998.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, R. R. (Ed.). (1989). Philippine colonial democracy. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasion, P. (2017, June 27). Why Leni Robredo can't be full-on opposition. Rappler. Retrieved at: http://www.rappler.com/nation/172938-leni-robredo-evolves-duterte-first-year
   Google Scholar
• Pasuk, P., & Baker, C. (2008). Thaksin’s populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38, 62–83. doi: 10.1080/00472330701651960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavin, C. (2011). Thaksin, the military, and Thailand’s protracted political crisis. In M. Mietzner (Ed.), The political resurgence of the military in Southeast Asia: Conflict and leadership (pp. 45–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pavin, C. (2014). ‘Good coup’ gone bad: Thailand’s political developments since thaksin’s downfall. In C. Pavin (Ed.), ‘Good coup’ gone Bad: Thailand’s political developments since Thaksin’s downfall (pp. 3–16). Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. (2017). Southeast Asia: Voting against disorder. Journal of Democracy, 28, 120–131. doi: 10.1353/jod.2017.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcalla, D. (2016, July 5). ‘Pork’ is back, insiders say. Philippine Star. Retrieved from: http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2016/07/05/1599648/pork-back-insiders-say
   Google Scholar
• Querubin, P. (2011). Political reform and elite persistence: Term limits and political dynasties in the Philippines (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://0d7619fa-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/pabloquerubin/research/Querubin_Term_Limits.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Quimpo, N. G. (2008). The Philippines: Political parties and corruption. In D. Singh, & L. C. Salazar (Eds.), Southeast Asian affairs (pp. 277–294). Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Raquiza, A. (2005, March 16). The proprietary presidency and the limits to Philippine democracy. Fil-Global Fellows. Retrieved from fil-globalfellows.org/proprietaryprez.html
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, T. (1998). Democratic governance and late industrialization. In F. Sta. AnaIII (Ed.), The state and the market: Essays on a socially oriented philippine economy (pp. 245–265). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romero, P. (2016, June 17). Filipino politicians rush for presidential perks. Asia Sentinel. Retrieved from: http://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/filipino-politicians-rush-presidential-perks/
   Google Scholar
• Ronas, M. C. (2011/2016). The never ending democratization of the Philippines. In F. B. Miranda, & T. C. Rivera (Eds.), Chasing the wind: Assessing Philippines democracy (2nd ed., pp. 75–106). Quezon City: Commission on Human Rights and the United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S., & Desierto, D. A. (2011). Hyper-presidentialism: Separation of powers without checks and balances in Argentina and Philippines. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29, 246–333.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (2017, July 2). Indonesia’s generals still a potent political force. Asia Sentinel. Retrieved from: http://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/indonesia-generals-still-potent-political-force/
   Google Scholar
• Rüland, J., Jurgenmeyer, C., Nelson, M. H., & Ziegenhain, P. (2005). Parliaments and political change in Asia. Singapore: ISEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Sherlock, S. (2009). Indonesia’s 2009 elections: The New electoral system and competing parties. Canberra: Centre for Democratic Institutions Policy Papers on Political Governance, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Sherlock, S. (2010). The parliament in Indonesia’s decade of democracy: People’s forum or chamber of cronies? In E. Aspinall, & M. Mietzner (Eds.), Problems of democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, institutions, and society (pp. 160–180). Singapore: ISEAS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siu, Z. I. (2017, April 30). Why Islamists, anti-Chinese sentiments don’t worry Joko Widodo. South China Morning Post. Retrieved from: http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2091624/whos-afraid-islamists-not-widodo
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2004). Indonesia’s accountability trap: Party cartels and presidential power after democratic transition. Indonesia, 78(October), 61–92.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2013). Democratic careening. World Politics, 65, 729–763. doi: 10.1017/S0043887113000233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepan, A., & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism versus presidentialism. World Politics, 46, 1–22. doi: 10.2307/2950664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teehankee, J. C. (2016a). Weak state, strong presidents: Situating the Duterte presidency in Philippine political time. Journal of Developing Societies, 32, 293–321. doi: 10.1177/0169796X16654594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teehankee, J. C. (2016b). Duterte’s resurgent nationalism in the Philippines: A discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of Current Southeastern Asian Affairs, 35, 69–89.
   Google Scholar
• Teehankee, J. C., & Thompson, M. R. (2016). The vote in the Philippines: Electing a strongman. Journal of Democracy, 27, 125–134. doi: 10.1353/jod.2016.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (1995). The anti-marcos struggle: Personalistic rule and democratic transition in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2008). People power sours: Uncivil society in Thailand and the Philippines. Current History, 107(712), 381–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2014). The politics Philippine presidents make: Presidential style, patronage-based or regime relational? Critical Asian Studies, 46, 433–460. doi: 10.1080/14672715.2014.935135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2016a). Introduction: The early Duterte presidency in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeastern Asian Affairs, 3, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2016b). Bloodied democracy: Duterte and the death of liberal reformism in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeastern Asian Affairs, 3, 39–68.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. R. (2017, August 7). Duterte’s illiberal democracy in the Philippines. East Asia Forum. Retrieved from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/08/07/80706/
   Google Scholar
• Ufen, A. (2012). Party systems, critical junctures, and cleavages in Southeast Asia. Asian Survey, 52, 441–464. doi: 10.1525/as.2012.52.3.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Loo, B. (2004). The failure of the Philippine presidential system. Asia Europe Journal, 2, 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, E. (2017). Indonesian politics in 2016: Jokowi and the new developmentalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52, 297–320. doi: 10.1080/00074918.2016.1249262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegenhain, P. (2015). Institutional engineering and political accountability in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar