Political parties matter: a research agenda on interactions among elites in post-conflict democracies

References

• Alfieri, V. (2016). Political parties and citizen political involvement in post-conflict Burundi: Between democratic claims and authoritarian tendencies. Civil Wars, 18(2), 234–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta, K. (2016). Imagined institutions: The symbolic power of formal rules in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Slavic Review, 75(4), 944–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belloni, R. (2012). Hybrid peace governance: Its emergence and significance. Global Governance, 18(1), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binningsbo, H. M., & Rustad, S. A. (2012). A price worth fighting for? Natural resources and conflict recurrence. Journal of Peace Research, 49(4), 531–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2000). The uneasy relationship between empirical and normative types in consociational theory. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(4), 395–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunk, B., (2018). The dynamics of donor and domestic elite interaction in Mozambique: Formal decentralisation and informal power structures. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(4), 321–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunte, J., & Vinson, L. T. (2016). Local power-sharing institutions and Interreligious violence in Nigeria. Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammet, M., & Malesky, E. (2012). Power sharing in postconflict societies. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 982–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. (2006). Confronting the weakest link: Aiding political parties in new democracies. Washington: Carnegie.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, N. (2004). Good fences make good neighbours? A comparison of conflict-regulation strategies in postwar Bosnia. Journal of Peace Research, 41(5), 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederman, L.-E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Buhaug, H. (2013). Inequality, grievances and civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Rohne, D. (2006). Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility and civil War. CSAE WPS/2006-10. Retrieved from https://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/2006-10text.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Costalli, S., & Ruggeri, A. (2015). Indignation, Ideologies, and armed mobilization, Italy, 1943–1945. International Security, 40(2), 119–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2004). The responsibility to protect? Imposing the Liberal Peace. International Peacekeeping, 11(1), 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw, J. (2010). ‘Sons of war’: Parties and party systems in post-war El Salvador and Cambodia. Democratization, 17(6), 1176–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. W., & Sambanis, N. (2000). International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 94(4), 779–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortna, V. P. (2004). Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 269–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, J. (2009). Consociationalism and its critics: Evidence from the historic Northern Ireland assembly election 2007. Electoral Studies, 28(3), 458–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, J. (2014). Potentially voting across the divide in deeply divided places: Ethnic catch-all voting in consociational Northern Ireland. Political Studies, 62(1), 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes, F. (2017). Exit from war: The transformation of rebels into post-war power elites. Security Dialogue, 48(2), 168–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley-Heenan, C., & MacGinty, R. (2008). Ethnic outbidding and party modernization: Understanding the Democratic Unionist Party’s electoral success in the post-agreement environment. Ethnopolitics, 7(1), 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B., Miller, M. K., & Strøm, K. W. (2017). Safeguarding democracy: Powersharing and democratic survival. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 686–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S., & Weiffen, B., (2018). Domestic elites and external actors in post-conflict democratisation: Mapping interactions and their impact. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(4), 257–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromes, T., (2009). A case study in ‘institutionalisation before liberalisation’: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1 (3), 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Groß, L., & Grimm, S. (2016). Conflicts of preferences and domestic constraints: Understanding reform failure in liberal state-building and democracy promotion. Contemporary Politics, 22(2), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groß, L., (2018). Lean models, complex realities: Elite interactions in postconflict democratisation at the local level. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(4), 301–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzell, C. A., (1999). Explaining the stability of negotiated settlements to intrastate wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43(1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartzell, C. A., & Hoddie, M. (2003). Institutionalizing peace: Power sharing and post-civil war conflict management. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 318–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensell, S., & Gerdes, F., (2012). Elites and international actors in post-war societies: The limits of intervention. International Peacekeeping, 19(2), 154–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddie, M., & Hartzell, C. A. (2010). Strengthening peace in post-civil war states. Transforming spoilers into stakeholders. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulsey, J. W., & Stjepanovic, D. (2017). Bosnia and Herzegovina: An archetical example of an ethnocracy. In A. H. Schakel (Ed.), Regional and national elections in Eastern Europe (pp. 35–58). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hulsey, J. W. (2010). Why did they vote for those guys again? Challenges and contradictions in the promotion of political moderation in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization, 17(6), 1132–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsey, J. W. (2015). Electoral accountability in Bosnia and Herzegovina under the Dayton framework agreement. International Peacekeeping, 22(5), 511–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. (2014). Civil wars and party systems. Social Science Quarterly, 95(2), 425–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J., & Batta, A. (2011). Swords into plowshares: The organizational transformation of rebel groups into political parties. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 44, 369–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarstad, A. K., & Sisk, T. D. (2008). From war to democracy. Dilemmas of peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, S., & Perry, V. (2015). Back to square one? An analysis of the, 2014. General elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Electoral Studies, 38, 82–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K., & de Zeeuw, J. (2008). International support for political parties in war-torn societies. In B. Reilly & P. Nordlund (Eds.), Political parties in conflict-prone societies: Regulation, engineering and democratic development (pp. 261–285). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2002). The wave of power-sharing democracy. In A. Reynolds (Ed.), The architecture of democracy: Constitutional design, conflict management, and democracy (pp. 37–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. (2016). From victorious rebels to strong authoritarian parties: Prospects for post-war democratization. Democratization, 23(6), 1026–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Ginty, R. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. (2007). Party-building on the Heels of War: El Salvador, Bosnia, Kosovo and Mozambique. Democratization, 14(2), 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C., & Smith, I. (2016). Political party formation by former armed opposition groups after civil war. Democratization, 23(6), 972–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning C., & Smith, I. (2018), Electoral performance by post-rebel parties. Government and Opposition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/gov.2018.34
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2006). Consociational theory, Northern Ireland’s conflict, and its agreement 2. What critics of consociation can learn from Northern Ireland. Government and Opposition, 41(2), 249–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrattan, C. (2014). Policing politics: Framing the past in post-conflict divided societies. Democratization, 21(3), 389–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. C., & Ishiyama, J. (2016). Does political inclusion of rebel parties promote peace after civil conflict?. Democratization, 23(6), 1009–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes, M., & Savun, B. (2009). Fostering peace after civil War: Commitment problems and agreement design. International Studies Quarterly, 53(3), 737–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G., Loizides, N., Sandal, N. A., & Lordos, A. (2014). Winning peace frames: Intra-ethnic outbidding in Northern Ireland and Cyprus. West European Politics, 37(1), 159–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, E., Paris, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2009). New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding. Tokyo: UNU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, M., & Strøm, K. W. (2014). Mutual veto and power-sharing. International Area Studies Review, 17(4), 343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B., & Nordlund, P. (2008). Political parties in conflict-prone societies: Regulation, engineering and democratic development. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. (2010). Centripetalism. In K. Cordell & S. Wolf (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of ethnic conflict (pp. 288–299). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. (2013). Political parties and post-conflict peacebuilding. Civil Wars, 15(1), 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, A. (2005). Reserved seats in national legislatures: A research note. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(2), 301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party system: A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sisk, T. D. (2013). Power sharing in civil war: Puzzles of peacemaking and peacebuilding. Civil Wars, 15(1), 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, I. S. (2000). Understanding inclusive peace agreements in Africa: The problems of sharing power. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. W., Gates, S., Graham, B. A. T., & Strand, H. (2015). Inclusion, dispersion, and constraint: Powersharing in the world’s states, 1975-2010. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 65–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sriram, C. L., & Zahar, M. (2009). The perils of power-sharing: Africa and beyond. Africa Spectrum, 44(3), 11–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2005). Electoral systems and the promotion of ‘consociationalism’ in a multi-ethnic society. The Kosovo assembly elections of November 2001. Electoral Studies, 24, 435–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touquet, H. (2011). Multi-ethnic parties in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Naša Stranka and the Paradoxes of Postethnic policies. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 11(3), 451–467.
   Google Scholar
• Wittig, K. (2016). Politics in the shadow of the gun: Revisiting the literature on ‘rebel-to-party transformations’ through the case of Burundi. Civil Wars, 18(2), 137–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J. (2015). Power in democracy promotion. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 40(3–4), 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürcher, C. (2018). A theory of democratisation through peace-building. Conflict, Security & Development, 18(4), 283–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar