Conceptualising capitalism in the twenty-first century: the BRICs and the European peripheryFootnote^*

* We dedicate our work to Uwe Becker – dear friend, ever-encouraging mentor and a critical spirit who never stopped questioning.

References

• Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2013). The sorrows of the young euro: Policy responses to the sovereign debt crisis. In N. Bermeo, & J. Pontusson (Eds.), Coping with crisis (pp. 162–198). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2016). Rethinking comparative political economy: The growth model perspective. Politics and Society, 44(2), 175–207. doi: 10.1177/0032329216638053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, D. (2011). Patrimonialism and neopatrimonialism: Comparative trajectories and readings. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 49(3), 275–294. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2011.582731
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2010). Compromesso senza riforme nel capitalismo italiano. In F. Barca (Ed.), Storia del capitalismo italiano (pp. 4–115). Roma: Donzelli.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. (2009). Open varieties of capitalism: Continuity, change and performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U. (2014). The BRICS and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation, and institutional change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, U., & Vasileva, A. (2017). Russia's political economy re-conceptualized: A changing hybrid of liberalism, statism and patrimonialism. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 8, 83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.euras.2016.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H., & Kriesi, H. (2015). The politics of advanced capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S., & Dore, R. (1996). National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity in Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, R. (2014). Politics and trajectory in Brazilian capitalist development. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICS and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation, and institutional change (pp. 123–143). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boschi, R. R., & Pinho, C. E. S. (2018). Crisis and austerity: the recent trajectory of capitalist development in Brazil. Contemporary Politics. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1555783
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2004). Une Théorie du Capitalisme est-elle Possible? Paris: Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2017). The political construction of Brazil: Society, economy, and state since independence. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (eds.). (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. (1994). The dynamics of financial globalization. Policy Sciences, 27, 319–342. doi: 10.1007/BF01000063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, D. (2000). Models of capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbridge, S. (2013). Corruption in India. In A. Kohli, & P. Singh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Indian politics (pp. 220–229). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2005). Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deeg, R., & Jackson, G. (2007). Toward a more dynamic theory of capitalist variety. Socio-Economic Review, 5(1), 149–179. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwl021
   Google Scholar
• DeGrauwe, P., & Ji, Y. (2012). Mispricing of sovereign risk and macroeconomic stability in the Eurozone. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(6), 866–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02287.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Sala, V. (2004). The Italian model of capitalism: On the road between globalization and Europeanization. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(6), 1041–1057. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000298093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, J., & Myant, M. (2011). Transition economies: Political economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N. (1973). Traditional patrimonialism and modern neo-patrimonialism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M., Matos, P. V., & Santos, V. (2018). The state as a large-scale aggregator: statist neoliberalism and waste management in Portugal. Contemporary Politics. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2018.1555784
   Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2011). Creative reconstructions: Multilateralism and European varieties of capitalism after 1950. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policy-making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. & Gingerich, D. (2004). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy. Discussion Paper 04/5. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancké, B., Rhodes, M., & Thatcher, M. (2007). Introduction. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism (pp. 3–38). New York, Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., & Smith, N. (2013). The resilience of Anglo-liberalism in the absence of growth: The UK and Irish cases. In V. A. Schmidt, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 289–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, D., & Wood, S. (1999). The political economy of Neoliberalism: Britain and the United States in the l980s. In H. Kitschelt et al (Ed.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism (pp. 371–397). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2008). Blat and guanxi: Informal practices in Russia and China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 50(1), 118–144. doi: 10.1017/S0010417508000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S., & Zürn, M. (2005). Transformations of the state? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J., Miura, M., & Park, G. (2006). Exiting Etatisme?: New directions in state policy in France and Japan. In J. Levy (Ed.), The state after statism (pp. 93–130). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, C. (2014). Die Kultur des Kapitalismus in Brasilien, Indien und China. In A. Nölke, C. May, & S. Claar (Eds.), Die Grossen Schwellenländer. Ursachen und Folgen ihres Aufstiegs in der Weltwirtschaft (pp. 85–99). Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• May, C., Nölke, A., & ten Brink, T. (2018). Public-private coordination in large emerging economies: the case of Brazil, India and China. Contemporary Politics. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1555781
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, S. (2014). Continuity and change in Indian capitalism. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICS and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation, and institutional change (pp. 79–99). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C. (2014). Evolution and contemporary manifestations of Sino-capitalism. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICS and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation, and institutional change (pp. 53–78). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A. (2018). Theorizing Sino-capitalism: implications for the study of comparative capitalisms. Contemporary Politics. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1553125
   Google Scholar
• Molina, O., & Rhodes, M. (2007). The political economy of adjustment in mixed market economies: A Study of Spain and Italy. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism: Contradictions, complementarities and change (pp. 223–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. (2003). The British regulatory state: High modernism and hyper-innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., Claar, S., & May, C. (2015). Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations, 21(3), 538–567. doi: 10.1177/1354066114553682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orenstein, M. (2013). Reassessing the neo-liberal development model in Central and Eastern Europe. In V. A. Schmidt, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 374–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, S., & Matsaganis, M. (2018). The political economy of austerity in Southern Europe. New Political Economy, 23(2), 192–207. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1370445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, A. (2012). The political economy of social pacts in the EMU: The Irish liberal market corporatism in crisis. New Political Economy, 17(4), 465–491. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2011.613456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, A., & Brazys, S. (2018). Celtic phoenix or leprechaun economics? The politics of an FDI-led growth model in Europe. New Political Economy, 23(2), 223–238. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1370447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (2011). Russian patrimonial capitalism and the international financial crisis. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 27, 434–455. doi: 10.1080/13523279.2011.595155
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. (ed.). (2013). The political economy of Russia. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rochlitz, M., Kulpina, V., Remington, T., & Yakovlev, A. (2015). Performance incentives and economic growth: Regional officials in Russia and China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(4), 421–445. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1089411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royo, S. (2008). Varieties of capitalism in Spain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2011). Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the pre-emption of democracy. Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften, 9(2), 163–198. doi: 10.5771/1610-7780-2011-2-163
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2013). Monetary union, fiscal crisis and the disabling of democratic accountability. In A. Schäfer, & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in an age of austerity (pp. 108–142). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The futures of European capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2009). Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back yet again. World Politics, 61(3), 516–546. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109000173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2012). What Happened to the state-influenced market economies? France, Italy, and Spain confront the crisis as the good, the bad, and the ugly. In W. Grant, & G. Wilson (Eds.), The consequences of the global financial crisis: The rhetoric of reform and regulation (pp. 156–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). The Europeanization of national economies. In S. Bulmer, & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Member states and the European Union (pp. 408–435). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2015). The forgotten problem of democratic legitimacy: ‘governing by the rules’ and ‘ruling by the numbers. In M. Matthijs, & M. Blyth (Eds.), The future of the Euro (pp. 90–116). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (2013). Theorizing ideational continuity: The resilience of neo-liberal ideas in Europe. In V. A. Schmidt, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. R. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shonfield, A. (1965). Modern capitalism: The changing balance of public and private power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. (2010). The evolution of modern states: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. H. (1994). American exceptionalism reconsidered: Culture or institutions? In L. C. Dodd, & C. Jillson (Eds.), The dynamics of American politics: Approaches and interpretations (pp. 106–131). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction. In W. Streeck, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. Z. (2004). Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technological innovation. International Organization, 58(3), 601–631. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304583066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiberghien, Y. (2007). Entrepreneurial states: Reforming corporate governance in France, Japan, and Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vasileva, A. (2014). Continuity and change in Russian capitalism. In U. Becker (Ed.), The BRICS and emerging economies in comparative perspective: Political economy, liberalisation, and institutional change (pp. 100–122). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasileva, A. (2018). Trapped in informality: The big role of small firms in Russia’s statist-patrimonial capitalism. New Political Economy, 23(3), 314–330. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1349090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasileva-Dienes, A., & Schmidt, V. A. (2018). Conceptualising capitalism in the twenty-first century: the BRICs and the European periphery. Contemporary Politics. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2018.1555746
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. (2003). Guiding globalization in East Asia: New roles for old developmental states. In L. Weiss (Ed.), States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back In (pp. 245–270). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (2005). How national are business systems? In G. Morgan, R. Whitley, & E. Moen (Eds.), Changing capitalisms? Internationalism, institutional change and systems of economic organization (pp. 190–231). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woo-Cumings, M. (ed.). (1999). The developmental state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., & Zhang, D. (2017). Does corruption hinder private businesses? Leadership stability and predictable corruption in China. Governance, 30(3), 343–363. doi: 10.1111/gove.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar