The three pillars of neoliberalism: Chile’s economic policy trajectory in comparative perspective

References

• Aguilera, C., & Fuentes, C. (2011). Elites y asesoría experta en Chile: comisiones y políticas públicas en el gobierno de Bachelet. In A. Joignant & P. Güell (Eds.), Notables Tecnócratas Mandarines, Elementos de Sociología de las Elites en Chile 1990–2010 (pp. 127–151). Santiago: Ediciones UDP.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilera, P. (2017, July 26). Cómo opera el Tribunal Constitucional y por qué su rol es decisivo en el proyecto de despenalización del aborto. El Desconcierto Retrieved from http://www.eldesconcierto.cl/2017/07/26/como-opera-el-tribunal-constitucional-y-por-que-su-rol-es-decisivo-en-el-proyecto-de-despenalizacion-del-aborto/
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B., & Palombarini, S. (2009). A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 7(1), 123–143. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwn018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artaza, F., & López, H. (2014, March 29). Bachelet se reinventa. La Tercera Online. Retrieved from http://www.latercera.com/noticia/bachelet-se-reinventa/
   Google Scholar
• Ban, C. (2016). Ruling ideas: How global neoliberalism goes local. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P. S. (1999). The limits of democracy: Socio-political compromise and regime change in post-Pinochet Chile. Studies in Comparative International Development, 34(3), 3–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02687625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2016). Causal case study methods. Foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching, and tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, A. (2008). La autonomía del Banco Central de Chile: origen y legitimación (Economic Policy Papers Central Bank of Chile No. 26). Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., & Haverland, H. (2012). Designing case studies. Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, T. C., & Gans-Morse, J. (2009). Neoliberalism: From new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(2), 137–161. doi: 10.1007/s12116-009-9040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogliaccini, J. A. (2012). Small latecomers into the global market. Power conflict and institutional change in Chile and Uruguay (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boylan, D. M. (1998). Preemptive strike: Central Bank reform in Chile’s transition from authoritarian rule. Comparative Politics, 30(4), 443–462. doi: 10.2307/422333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bril-Mascrenhas, T., & Madariaga, A. (2019). Business power and the minimal state. The defeat of industrial policy in Chile. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(6), 1047–1066. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2017.1417587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campero, G. (1984). Los gremios empresariales en el período 1970–1983: comportamiento sociopolítico y orientaciones ideológicas. Santiago: Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales.
   Google Scholar
• Campero, G. (1993). Los empresarios chilenos en el régimen militar y el post-plebiscito. In P. W. Drake & I. Jakšić (Eds.), El Difícil Camino Hacia la Democracia En Chile 1982–1990 (pp. 243–304). Santiago: FLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Carvallo, L. (2015, March 12). Hernán Somerville saca la voz: ‘Los abusos deben pagarse con cárcel’. CARAS. Retrieved from http://www.caras.cl/politica/hernan-somerville-saca-la-voz-los-abusos-deben-pagarse-con-carcel/
   Google Scholar
• Centeno, M. A., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (1997). The politics of expertise in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R., & Dados, N. (2014). Where in the world does neoliberalism come from? Theory & Society, 43(2), 117–138. doi: 10.1007/s11186-014-9212-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2013). The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El Desconcierto. (2016, March 21). Burgos y Valdés: Los ministros neoliberales que le ponen freno de mano a las reformas de su gobierno. Retreived from https://www.eldesconcierto.cl/new/2016/03/21/burgos-y-valdes-los-ministros-neoliberales-que-le-ponen-freno-de-mano-a-las-reformas-de-su-gobierno/
   Google Scholar
• El Mercurio. (2014, March 25). Senador Quintana anuncia ‘retroexcavadora’ contra modelo neoliberal. Retrieved from http://www.emol.com/noticias/nacional/2014/03/25/651676/nueva-mayoria-advierte-que-pasara-retroexcavadora.html
   Google Scholar
• Etchemendy, S. (2012). Models of economic liberalization. Business, workers, and compensation in Latin America, Spain, and Portugal. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, T. (2015a). Structural power in comparative political economy: Pesrspectives from policy formulation in Latin America. Bussiness and Politics, 17(3), 411–441. doi: 10.1515/bap-2014-0047
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, T. (2015b). Private wealth and public revenue in Latin America: Business power and tax politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, M., & Sally, R. (2002). From the Soviet Union to the European Union: Estonian trade policy, 1991–2000. The World Economy, 25(1), 79–106. doi: 10.1111/1467-9701.00421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores-Macías, G. A. (2012). After neoliberalism?: The left and economic reforms in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foxley, A. (1987). Chile y su futuro: un país posible. Santiago: CIEPLAN.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, V. (2002). The elusive goal in democratic Chile: Reforming the Pinochet Labor Legislation. Latin American Politics & Society, 44(1), 35–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2002.tb00196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden, J. A. (1991). Debt, development, and democracy: Modern political economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, C. (2012). El Pacto. Poder, constitución y prácticas políticas en Chile (1990–2010). Santiago: Ediciones UDP.
   Google Scholar
• Garret, G., & Lange, P. (1996). Internationalization, institutions and political change. In R. O. Keohane & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Internationalization and domestic politics (pp. 48–77). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garretón, M. A. (2000). Chile’s elections: Change and continuity. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 78–84. doi: 10.1353/jod.2000.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., & Cojocaru, L. (2016). Selecting cases for intensive analysis: A diversity of goals and methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 392–423. doi: 10.1177/0049124116631692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo, J. K. (1996). Development and democracy in Chile: Finance Minister Alejandro Foxley and the concertación’s project for the 1990s. In J. I. Domínguez (Ed.), Technopols: Freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s (pp. 229–275). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2012). On hegemony. In C. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, & I. Virk (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (3rd ed., pp. 237–250). Chichester; Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1997). The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of industrialized nations. In M. Luchbach & A. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics. Rationality, culture and structure (pp. 174–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (2005). Preference formation as a political process: The case of monetary union in Europe. In I. Katznelson & B. Weingast (Eds.), Preferences and situations. Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism (pp. 129–160). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2004). Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1), 204–226. doi: 10.1080/0969229042000179811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojman, D. E. (1990). Chile after Pinochet: Aylwin’s Christian democrat economic policies for the 1990s. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 9(1), 25–47. doi: 10.2307/3338215
   Google Scholar
• Hope, C. J. (2019). Developmentalism, dependency, and the state: Industrial policy and structural transformation in Namibia since 1900 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Process tracing the effects of ideas. In A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing. From metaphor to analytical tool (pp. 41–72). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joignant, A. (2011). Tecnócratas, technopols y dirigentes de partido. Tipos de agentes y especies de capital en las élites gubernamentales de la Concertación (1990–2010). In A. Joignant & P. Güell (Eds.), Notables Tecnócratas y Mandarines Elementos de Sociología de Las Elites En Chile 1990–2010 (pp. 49–76). Santiago: Ediciones UDP.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (2013). Economic crisis and global governance: The stability of a globalized world. In M. Kahler & D. A. Lake (Eds.), Politics in the new hard times. The great recession in comparative perspective (pp. 27–51). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. B. (2013). Globalization and austerity politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katznelson, I., & Weingast, B. (Eds.). (2005). Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F. (2011). Ideas, institutions, and interests: Explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(6), 1116–1134. doi: 10.1068/c1142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingstone, P. R. (2001). Why free trade ‘losers’ support free trade industrialists and the surprising politics of trade reform in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 34(9), 986–1010. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034009002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. (1985). Power resources approach vs. action and conflict: On causal and intentional explanations in the study of power. Sociological Theory, 3(2), 31–45. doi: 10.2307/202223
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, F. (2010). Business groups in Chile. In A. M. Colpan, T. Hikino, & J. R. Lincoln (Eds.), Oxford handbook of business groups (pp. 387–422). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madariaga, A. (2017). Mechanisms of neoliberal resilience: Comparing exchange rates and industrial policy in Chile and Estonia. Socio-Economic Review, 15(3), 637–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madariaga, A. (forthcoming). Neoliberal resilience. Lessons in democracy and development from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2005). Combining institutionalisms: Liberal choices and political trajectories in Central America. In I. Katznelson & B. Weingast (Eds.). Preferences and situations: Points of intersection between historical and rational choice institutionalism (pp. 313–334). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Maron, A., & Shalev, M. (Eds.). (2017). Neoliberalism as a state project: Changing the political economy of Israel. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Franzoni, J., & Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2016). The quest for universal social policy in the south: Actors, ideas and architectures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meller, P., & Bravo, C. (2000). Análisis historiográfico de la literatura económica chilena ( CIEPLAN Report No. 4). Santiago: CIEPLAN.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monckeberg, M. O. (2005). La privatización de las universidades: una historia de dinero, poder e influencias. Santiago: Copa Rota.
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos, V. (2003). Economic policy making and parliamentary accountability in Chile ( Report No. 11). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).
   Google Scholar
• Montero, C. (1996). Los empresarios en el desarrollo chileno. Ensaios FEE Porto Alegre, 17(2), 152–181.
   Google Scholar
• Palier, B., & Surel, Y. (2005). Les ‘trois I’ et l’analyse de l’État en action. Revue français de science politiques, 55(1), 7–32. doi: 10.3917/rfsp.551.0007
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, D. (2004). Origins of the Chilean binominal election system. Revista de Ciencia Política, 24(1), 38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Polga-Hecimovich, J., & Siavelis, P. M. (2015). Here’s the bias! A (re-)reassessment of the Chilean electoral system. Electoral Studies, 40, 268–279. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Thatcher, M. (Eds.). (2013). Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, P. M. (2010). President and congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional constraints to democratic consolidation. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. (1991). Technocrats and Politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks. Journal of Latin American Studies, 23(2), 385–410. doi: 10.1017/S0022216X00014048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, E. (1996). The state and capital in Chile: Business elites, technocrats, and market economics. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. (2002). Capital and the Lagos presidency: Business as usual? Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21(3), 339–357. doi: 10.1111/1470-9856.00047
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P. (2011). La elite tecnocrática en la era de la Concertación. In A. Joignant & P. Güell (Eds.), Notables Tecnócratas y Mandarines Elementos de Sociología de Las Elites En Chile 1990–2010 (pp. 241–269). Santiago: Ediciones UDP.
   Google Scholar
• Solimano, A. (2012). Chile and the neoliberal trap: The post-pinochet era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (2006). From pinochet to the ‘third way’: Neoliberalism and social transformation in Chile. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M. (2013). Supranational neo-liberalization: The EU’s regulatory model of economic markets. In V. A. Schmidt & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism in the European political economy (pp. 171–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undurraga, T. (2014). Divergencias. Trayectorias del neoliberalismo en Argentina y Chile. Santiago: Ediciones UDP.
   Google Scholar
• Valdés, J. G. (2003). Pinochet’s economists. The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, A., & Zhang, X. (2012). East Asian capitalism: Diversity, continuity, and change. New York; London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (1999). Economic policy in Chile’s new democracy. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 41(3), 67–96. doi: 10.2307/166159
   Google Scholar
• Wylde, C. (2012). Latin America after neoliberalism: Developmental regimes in post-crisis states. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar