Contagious politics and COVID-19: does the infectious disease hit populist supporters harder?

References

• Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., & Jackson, M. O. (2015). History, expectations, and leadership in the evolution of social norms. The Review of Economic Studies, 82(2), 423–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzenman, N., Cavalcanti, T., & Da Mata, D. (2020). More than words: Leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582908
   Google Scholar
• Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J. C., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & D. Yang (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Working Paper 26946. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26946
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., d’Adda, G., Weber, R., & Zehnder, C. (2014). Just words? Just speeches? On the economic value of charismatic leadership. NBER WP. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4219
   Google Scholar
• Bækgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2020). Rallying around the flag in times of COVID-19: Societal lockdown and trust in democratic institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.32.172
   Google Scholar
• Baena-Díez, M. J., Barroso, M., Cordeiro-Coelho, S. A., Díaz, J. L., & Grau, M. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 outbreak by income: Hitting hardest the most deprived. Journal of Public Health, 42(4), 698–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., Alsan, M., Breza, E., Chandrasekhar, A., Chowdhury, A., Duflo, E., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., & Olken, B. (2020). Messages on COVID-19 prevention in india increased symptoms reporting and adherence to preventive behaviors among 25 million recipients with similar effects on non-recipient members of their communities. Working Paper 27496. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27496
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batista Pereira, F., & Nunes, F. (2021). Media choice and the polarization of public opinion about COVID-19 in Brazil. Revista Latinoamericana De Opinión Pública, 10(2), 39–57. (Anexo 59). https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.23681
   Google Scholar
• Bhadra, A., Mukherjee, A., & Sarkar, K. (2021). Impact of population density on COVID-19 infected and mortality rate in India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7(1), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00984-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2003). Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible? Public Administration Review, 63(5), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2016). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339756
   Google Scholar
• Burni, A., & Tamaki, E. (2021). Populist communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Brazil’s president bolsonaro. Partecipazione & Conflitto, 14(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v14i1p113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, S., Ito, N., & Pongeluppe, L. (2021). The disastrous effects of leaders in denial: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in Brazil. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract = 3836147 or http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3836147
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, E., & Ventura, T. (2021). Will I get COVID-19? Partisanship, social media frames, and perceptions of health risk in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 63(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelen, B., Mukherjee, A., & Kariv, S. (2004). Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. American Economic Review, 94(3), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. PROSPECTS, 49(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewan, T., & Myatt, D. (2008). The qualities of leadership: Direction, communication, and obfuscation. The American Political Science Review, 102(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, J., Andriano, L., Brazel, D. M., Rotondi, V., Block, P., & Ding, X. (2020). Demographic science aids in understanding the spread and fatality rates of COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(18), 9696–9698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004911117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberl, J. M., Huber, R., & Greussing, E. (2021). From populism to the ‘plandemic’: Why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924730
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, M. (2005). Populist parties of the right. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Movements of exclusion: Radical right-wing populism (pp. 1–24). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2020). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3562796. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3562796
   Google Scholar
• Golub, B., & Jackson, M. O. (2010). Naïve learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(1), 112–149. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.2.1.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramacho, W. G., & Turgeon, M. (2021). When politics collides with public health: COVID-19 vaccine country of origin and vaccination acceptance in Brazil. Vaccine, 39(19), 2608–2612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramacho, W., Turgeon, M., Kennedy, J., Stabile, M., & Mundim, P. S. (2021). Political preferences, knowledge, and misinformation about COVID-19: The case of Brazil. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 646430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.646430
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., & Milner, H. (2006). The determinants of political knowledge in comparative perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(4), 386–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is chávez populist?: Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective.”. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K., & Littvay, L. (2019). Contemporary US populism in comparative perspective (1st ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108644655
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K., Read, M., & Pauwels, T. (2017). Populism and its causes. Edited by Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.13
   Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E. (2017). At the Helm, Kirk or Spock? Why even wholly rational actors may favor and respond to charismatic leaders. Technical Report. Working paper, UC Berkeley. https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/medias/stories/sem_13_14/IO/hermalin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. A. (2001). Vulnerability and dangerousness: The construction of gender through conversation about violence. Gender and Society, 15(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, W., & Power, T. J. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotrt, N., & Westwood, S. N. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. S., & Levine, P. B. (2015). Media influences on social outcomes: The impact of MTV’s 16 and pregnant on teen childbearing. American Economic Review, 105(12), 3597–3632. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20140012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingstone, P. R., & Timothy, J. P. (eds.). (2017). Democratic Brazil divided. Pitt latin American series. Pittsburgh. University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H., & McGann, J. A. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluwe-Schiavon, B., Wendt, T., Viola, Bandinelli, L. P., Castro, S. C. C., Kristensen, C. H., Costa da Costa, J., & Grassi-Oliveira, R. (2021). A behavioral economic risk aversion experiment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, G. S. (2013). Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ policies and performance. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (1988). Of rule and revenue. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxfield, S., Shapiro, M., Gupta, V., & Hass, S. (2010). Gender and risk: Women, risk taking and risk aversion. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(7), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411011081383
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J. P. (2001). Machiavellian democracy: Controlling elites with ferocious populism. The American Political Science Review, 95(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401002027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkley, E., & Stecula, D. (2020). Party cues in the news: Democratic elites, republican backlash and the dynamics of climate skepticism. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1439–1456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. (2020). Pandemic populism: An analysis of populist leaders’ responses to Covid-19. Tony Blair Institute for Global Governance Working Paper. https://institute.global/policy/pandemic-populismanalysis-populist-leaders-responses-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• Michel, E., Garzia, D., Ferreira da Silva, F., & De Angelis, A. (2020). Leader effects and voting for the populist radical right in Western Europe. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Outreville, J. F. (2015). The relationship between relative risk aversion and the level of education: A survey and implications for the demand for life insurance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, J. C. W. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic, international cooperation, and populism. International Organization, 74(S1), E191–E212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000399
   Google Scholar
• Pickup, M., Stecula, D., & van der Linden, C. (2020). Novel coronavirus, old partisanship: COVID-19 attitudes and behaviours in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 53(2), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platow, M. J. S., Haslam, A., Reicher, D. S., & Steffens, N. (2015). There is no leadership if no-one follows: Why leadership Is necessarily a group process. International Coaching Psychology Review, 10(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2015.10.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Razafindrakoto, M., Roubaud, F., Saboia, J., Reis Castilho, M., & Pero, V. (2021). Municípios in the time of COVID-19 in Brazil: Socioeconomic vulnerabilities, transmission factors and public policies. The European Journal of Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00487-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennó, L., Avritzer, L., Carvalho, & de Carvalho, P. D. (2021). Entrenching right-wing populism under COVID-19: Denialism, social mobility, and government evaluation in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 36. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.36.247120
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiker, A. (2020). Populist leadership: The superhero Donald Trump as savior in times of crisis. Political Studies, 68(4), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, F. F., & Betti, G. (2021). The pandemic of poverty, vulnerability, and COVID-19: Evidence from a fuzzy multidimensional analysis of deprivations in Brazil. World Development, 139, 105307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travassos, C., & Williams, D. R. (2004). The concept and measurement of race and their relationship to public health: A review focused on Brazil and the United States. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 20(3), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2004000300003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. J., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2021). Populism as a political strategy: An approach’s enduring – and increasing – advantages. Political Studies, 69(2), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211002669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildman, W. J., Bulbulia, J., Sosis, R., & Schjoedt, U. (2020). Religion and the COVID-19 pandemic. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2020.1749339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier, D. R., e Silva, E. L., Lara, F., e Silva, G. R. R., Oliveira, M. F., Gurgel, H., & Barcellos, C. (2022). Involvement of political and socio-economic factors in the spatial and temporal dynamics of COVID-19 outcomes in Brazil: A population-based study. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 10, 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100221
   PubMedGoogle Scholar