Crafting consensus: Indonesia’s discursive strategies in legitimising free trade policy

References

• Acharya, A. (2015). Indonesia matters: Asia’s emerging democratic power. World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Fadhat, F. (2019). The rise of international capital: Indonesian conglomerates in ASEAN. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3191-6
   Google Scholar
• Al-Fadhat, F. (2022). Big business capital expansion and the shift of Indonesia’s global economic policy outlook. East Asia, 39(4), 389–406. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-022-09384-3
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2013). A nation in fragments. Critical Asian Studies, 45(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2013.758820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearce, D. H., & Moya, S. L. (2020). Why is the mass public Not more supportive of free trade? Evidence from the United States. International Studies Quarterly, 64(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, E., Yatawara, R. A., & Wang, W. G. (2005). Who supports free trade in Latin America? World Economy, 28(7), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capling, A. (2008). Preferential trade agreements as instruments of foreign policy: An Australia–Japan free trade agreement and its implications for the Asia pacific region. The Pacific Review, 21(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740701868765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion, C., & Bonoli, G. (2011). Institutional fragmentation and coordination initiatives in western European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711412220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, G., & Stubbs, R. (2011). China, regional institution-building and the China-ASEAN free trade area. Review of International Political Economy, 18(3), 277–298. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692291003762548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. (2018). A middle power’s trade policy under U.S.-China FTA competition: South Korea’s double hedging FTA diplomacy. Contemporary Politics, 24(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1416735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. (2022). FTA motives in South Korea: Is an FTA a way to increase general welfare or to meet political interest? Contemporary Politics, 28(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1984042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2014). The European commission’s neoliberal trade discourse since the crisis: Legitimizing continuity through subtle discursive change. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieter, H. (2021). RCEP-Countries create Asia-Pacific free trade zone: Trade facilitation but no integrated bloc. SWP Comments, Article 3/2021. https://ideas.repec.org//p/zbw/swpcom/32021.html
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale, P., & Armstrong, S. (2021). RCEP: A strategic opportunity for multilateralism. China Economic Journal, 14(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2021.1937092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouilleux, E. (2004). CAP reforms and multilateral trade negotiations: Another view on discourse efficiency. West European Politics, 27(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238042000214892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard, K. (2014). ASEAN and civil society activities in ‘created spaces’: The limits of liberty. The Pacific Review, 27(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.882395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gultom, D. (2020). RCEP: The opportunity for Indonesia and steps of Its implementation, An insider’s perspective (0 ed.). Center for Indonesian Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.35497/332237
   Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V. (2010). Localising power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia perspective. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., & Jo-Anne Smith, N. (2010). How policy-makers (really) understand globalization: The internal architecture of anglophone globalization discourse in Europe. Public Administration, 88(4), 903–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01863.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiduk, F. (2016). Indonesia in ASEAN. Regional leadership between ambition and ambiguity. Stiftung Wissenschaft Und Politik, 39, 38.
   Google Scholar
• IGJ. (2021, October 18). RCEP Agreement Has Broad Potential towards People’s Lives, The House of Representatives of Indonesia Must Conduct Impact Assessment. Indonesia for Global Justice. https://igj.or.id/rcep-agreement-has-broad-potential-towards-peoples-lives-the-house-of-representatives-of-indonesia-must-conduct-impact-assessment/?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Indraswari, R. (2022). ASEAN centrality: Comparative case study of Indonesia leadership. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 10(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v10i1.7906
   Google Scholar
• Ingot, S. R., & Laksani, D. D. (2019, September 14). Indonesia global value chain participation in Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Proceedings of the International Conference on Trade 2019 (ICOT 2019). Proceedings of the International Conference on Trade 2019 (ICOT 2019), Cikini, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/icot-19.2019.34
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., & Yu, M. (2021). Understanding RCEP and CPTPP: From the perspective China’s dual circulation economic strategy. China Economic Journal, 14(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2021.1933055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. (2010). China’s pursuit of free trade agreements: Is China exceptional? Review of International Political Economy, 17(2), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290903337799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (2016). Explaining the failure of the ASEAN economic community: The primacy of domestic political economy. The Pacific Review, 29(5), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1022593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2017). Role conflict and the limits of state identity: The case of Indonesia in democracy promotion. The Pacific Review, 30(3), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1249908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2021a). Role legitimation in foreign policy: The case of Indonesia as an emerging power under Yudhoyono’s presidency (2004–2014). Foreign Policy Analysis, 17(3), orab010. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orab010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F. (2021b). When trade and foreign policy collide: Indonesia in Doha development round. The Pacific Review, 34(4), 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1724189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, M. F., Rahutomo, R., Manuaba, I. B. K., Purwandari, K., Mursitama, T. N., & Pardamean, B. (2023). Free trade as domestic, economic, and strategic issues: A big data analytics approach. Journal of Big Data, 10(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00722-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ke, H. (2019). ASEAN in the middle of US and Chinese rivalry: ASEAN cooperation with RCEP in reducing the impact of the trade War. International Journal of Science and Society, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v1i1.6
   Google Scholar
• Kemendag. (2019). Selayang Pandang RCEP. Direktorat Perundingan ASEAN. https://ditjenppi.kemendag.go.id/assets/files/publikasi/doc_20191215_selayang-pandang-rcep.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kemenkop UKM. (2019). Perkembangan Data Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Menengah (UMKM) dan Usaha Besar (UB) Tahun 2018–2019. https://kemenkopukm.go.id/uploads/laporan/1650868533_SANDINGAN_DATA_UMKM_2018-2019%20=.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koalisi Masyarakat Sipil untuk Keadilan Ekonomi. (2021). Catatan Kritis Masyarakat Sipil terhadap Perjanjian RCEP. Indonesia for Global Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Komisi VI DPR. (2022, January 6). Ratifikasi RCEP Indonesia Terlambat, Nevi Zuarina: Ada Jeda dari Persetujuan Awal Hingga Pembahasan di DPR. https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/36841/t/Ratifikasi+RCEP+Indonesia+Terlambat%2C+Nevi+Zuarina%3A+Ada+Jeda+dari+Persetujuan+Awal+Hingga+Pembahasan+di+DPR
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. Y.-T., & Katada, S. N. (2022). Striving for greatness: Status aspirations, rhetorical entrapment, and domestic reforms. Review of International Political Economy, 29(1), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1801486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastel, G. (2004). The rise of the free trade agreement. Challenge, 47(4), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2004.11034258
   Google Scholar
• Medrano, J. D., & Braun, M. (2012). Uninformed citizens and support for free trade. Review of International Political Economy, 19(3), 448–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.561127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2020, May 14). Laporan Kinerja Kemenlu | Portal Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. https://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/223/akip/laporan-kinerja-kemenlu
   Google Scholar
• Naoi, M. (2015). Building legislative coalitions for free trade in Asia: Globalization as legislation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oba, M. (2016). TPP, RCEP, and FTAAP: Mulitlayered regional economic integration and international relations. Asia-Pacific Review, 23(1), 100–114. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2016.1195957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pemerintah Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Perdagangan Tahun 2020-2024. https://www.kemendag.go.id/storage/article/content_upload/transparansi_kerja/PERMENDAG%20NOMOR%2046%20TAHUN%202020-compress.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. B., & Widyaningsih, E. (2015). Indonesian leadership in ASEAN: Mediation, agency and extra-regional diplomacy. In C. B. Roberts, A. D. Habir, & L. C. Sebastian (Eds.), Indonesia’s ascent (pp. 264–286). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397416_13
   Google Scholar
• Rosyidin, M. (2020). Promoting a home-grown democracy: Indonesia’s approach of democracy promotion in the Bali democracy Forum (BDF). Asian Journal of Political Science, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1814361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. (2014). The limits of democratizing interest representation: ASEAN’s regional corporatism and normative challenges. European Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112445289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüland, J. (2016). Why (most) Indonesian businesses fear the ASEAN economic community: Struggling with Southeast Asia’s regional corporatism. Third World Quarterly, 37(6), 1130–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1133245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santikajaya, A. (2016). Walking the middle path: The characteristics of Indonesia’s rise. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 71(4), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702016686381
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The futures of European capitalism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism.’. European Political Science Review, 2(01), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2014). Speaking to the markets or to the people? A discursive institutionalist analysis of the EU’s Sovereign debt crisis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. (2011). Resisting protectionism after the crisis: Strategic economic discourse and the EU–Korea free trade agreement. New Political Economy, 16(5), 627–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.602187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R. (2002). ASEAN plus three: Emerging East Asian regionalism? Asian Survey, 42(3), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2002.42.3.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukma, R. (2012). Domestic politics and international posture: Constraints and possibilities. In A. J. S. Reid (Ed.), Indonesia rising: The repositioning of Asia’s third giant (pp. 77–92). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Syafriadi, A. (2019, July 3). Kemenkop Dorong Pendirian Pusat Informasi UKM Nasional. Akurat.co. https://akurat.co/kemenkop-dorong-pendirian-pusat-informasi-ukm-nasional
   Google Scholar
• Syarip, R. (2020). Defending foreign policy at home: Indonesia and the ASEAN-Based free trade agreements. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935556
   Google Scholar
• Terada, T. (2003). Constructing an ‘East Asian’ concept and growing regional identity: From EAEC to ASEAN+3. The Pacific Review, 16(2), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951274032000069615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Sharma, V. (2021). India’s RCEP dilemma with China: Beyond the legal texts*. Pacific Focus, 36(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicaksana, I. G. W. (2021). Economic nationalism for political legitimacy in Indonesia. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-019-00182-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. D. (2015). Mega-Regional trade deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TPP and RCEP? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(2), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.956138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, M. (2015). China and competing cooperation in Asia-Pacific: TPP, RCEP, and the New Silk Road. Asian Security, 11(3), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2015.1109509
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimatsu, H. (2012). ASEAN and evolving power relations in East Asia: Strategies and constraints. Contemporary Politics, 18(4), 400–415. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2012.728030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar