Conceptualising democratic resilience: a minimalist account

References

• Ackerman, B., & Fishkin, J. (2004). Deliberation Day. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, R., & Pal, M. (2017). The democratic resilience of the Canadian constitution. In M. Graber, S. Levinson, & M. Tushnet (Eds.), Constitutional democracy in crisis? (pp. 117–137). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. (2003). Defending the purely instrumental account of democratic legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balderacchi, C. (2017). Participatory mechanisms in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela: Deepening or undermining democracy? Government & Opposition, 52(1), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, S. (2011). Electoral malpractice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boese, V., Edgell, A., Hellmeier, S., Maerz, S., & Lindberg, S. (2021). How democracies prevail: Democratic resilience as a Two-stage process. Democratization, 28(5), 885–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, P. (2018). A genealogy of resilience. International Political Sociology, 12(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olx026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, P., & Calvert, P. (1999). The resilience of democracy: An introduction. Democratization, 6(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349908403594
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1986). An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics, 97(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/292815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C.H., Lindberg, S., Teorell, J., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M.S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Good God, A., Grahn, S., Hicken, A., Kinzelbach, K., Krusell, J., Marquardt, K.L., McMann, K. ... Ziblatt, D. (2022). “V-Dem [Country-Year/Country-Date] Dataset v12” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, T. G. (2019). Democratic decay: Conceptualising an emerging research field. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1), 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00086-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lara, F. B., & de la Torre, C. (2020). The pushback against populism: Why Ecuador’s referendums backfired. Journal of Democracy, 31(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, C. (2014). The people, democracy, and authoritarianism in Rafael Correa’s Ecuador. Constellations (Oxford, England), 21(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12117
   Google Scholar
• de la Torre, C., & Ortiz Lemos, A. (2016). Populist polarization and the slow death of democracy in Ecuador. Democratization, 23(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1058784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (2016). The philosophy and methods of political science. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, S., & Lim, J. (2021). The supply and demand model of civic education: Evidence from a field experiment in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Democratization, 28(5), 970–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1843156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2021). Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression. Democratization, 28(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, H., Kronick, D., Levendusky, M., & Meredith, M. (2022). The majoritarian threat to liberal democracy. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2020.44
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, P. (2020). Populism in power and democracy: Democratic decay and resilience in the Czech republic (2013–2020). Politics and Governance, 8(4), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & Puranen, B. (Ed.). (2020). World values survey: Round seven – country-pooled datafile. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, S., & Kaufmann, R. (2021). Backsliding. Democratic regress in the contemporary world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., & Manwaring, R. (2023). How well does ‘resilience’ apply to democracy? A systematic review. Contemporary Politics, 29(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2022.2069312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E. & Puranen, B. (eds.). (2018). World values survey: Round six - country-pooled datafile. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N. (2014). Rule over none II: Social equality and the justification of democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 42(4), 287–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laebens, M., & Luhrmann, A. (2021). What halts democratic erosion? The changing role of accountability. Democratization, 28(5), 908–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1897109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, R., Mettler, S., & Roberts, K. (2022). Democratic resilience. Can the United States withstand rising polarization? Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mauk, M. (2022). Stable support for democracy in East and Southeast Asia? Examining citizens’ trust in democratic institutions. East Asia, 39(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09381-y
   Google Scholar
• Merkel, W., & Luhrmann, A. (2021). Resilience of democracies: Responses to illiberal and authoritarian challenges. Democratization, 28(5), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1928081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palos Pons, M., & Hallin, D. (2021). Press freedom and media reform in a populist regime: How Ecuadorian journalists and policy actors see the Correa Era. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1021–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, F. (2009). Democratic legitimacy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2020). Reshaping the state: The unitary executive presidency of Rafael Correa. In F. Sanchez, & S. Pachano (Eds.), Assessing the left turn in Ecuador (pp. 15–39). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1945 [1969]), The open society and its enemies, volume 1. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (1999). Minimalist conception of democracy: A defense. In I. Shapiro, & C. Hacker-Cordon (Eds.), Democracy’s value (pp. 23–55). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971 [1999]). A theory of justice. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, W. (1988). Liberalism against populism. A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, I. (2016). Aggression and play in the face of adversity: A psychoanalytic reading of democratic resilience. Political Theory, 44(3), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591714543859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffon, M. P., & Urbinati, N. (2013). Procedural democracy, the bulwark of equal liberty. Political Theory, 41(3), 441–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591713476872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1942 [2003]). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, H., & Olsson, L. (2018). Is resilience a normative concept? Resilience, 2(6), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1406842
   Google Scholar
• Waldner, D., & Lust, E. (2018). Unwelcome change: Coming to terms with democratic backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, S., & Beetham, D. (1999). Political power and democratic control in Britain. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C. (2021). Democratic horizons: What value change reveals about the future of democracy. Democratization, 28(5), 992–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1883001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. L. (2019). Democratic equality. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, F. (2022). What is democratic backsliding? Constellations (Oxford, England). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar