The ontological core of political radicalism. Exploring the role of antagonist, dogmatic, and populist beliefs in structuring radical ideologies

References

• Abts, K., & Baute, S. (2022). Social resentment, blame attribution and Euroscepticism: The role of status insecurity, relative deprivation and powerlessness. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1964350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abts, K., Kochuyt, T., & Van Kessel, S. (2018). Populism in Belgium: The mobilization of the body anti-politic. In K. A. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism (pp. 330–349). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahler, D. J., & Broockman, D. E. (2018). The delegate paradox: Why polarized politicians can represent citizens best. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1117–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist Are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, Z., & Barney, D. J. (2018). The party reacts: The strategic nature of endorsements of Donald Trump. American Politics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18808022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altemeyer, B. (2002). Dogmatic behavior among students: Testing a New measure of dogmatism. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(6), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkeson, L. R., & Maestas, C. D. (2012). Catastrophic politics: How extraordinary events redefine perceptions of government. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Backes, U. (2007). Meaning and forms of political extremism in past and present. Středoevropské Politické Studie, IX(4), 242–262.
   Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Gelman, A. (2008). Partisans without constraint: Political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 408–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/590649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Goldberg, A. (2014). Neither ideologues nor agnostics: Alternative voters’ belief system in an Age of partisan politics. American Journal of Sociology, 120(1), 45–95. https://doi.org/10.1086/676042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsou, E., & Caramani, D. (2020). People haven’t had enough of experts: Technocratic attitudes among citizens in nine European democracies. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. E. (2011). The declining electoral relevance of traditional cleavage groups. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773910000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, H.-G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Biglieri, P., & Perelló, G. (2011). The Names of the Real in Laclau’s Theory: Antagonism, Dislocation, and Heterogeneity. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Billiet, A.-P., Bart Maddens, & André-Paul Frognier. (2009). Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between flemings and walloons. In Marleen Brans, Lieven De Winter, & Wilfried Swenden (Eds.), The politics of Belgium (pp. 50–70). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E. (2016). Approaches to studying policy representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daenekindt, S., de Koster, W., & van der Waal, J. (2017). How people organise cultural attitudes: Cultural belief systems and the populist radical right. West European Politics, 40(4), 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1271970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, H., & Klandermans, B. (2000). Political racism in Flanders and The Netherlands: Explaining differences in the electoral success of extreme right-wing parties. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26(4), 699–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/713680504
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, D. (2012). Engines of change: Party factions in American politics, 1868-2010. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199891702.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2012). Public ideology and political dynamics in the United States. American Politics Research, 40(2), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X11429846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., Mackuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2001). The macro polity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139086912
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., Homola, J., & Tavits, M. (2014). When extremism pays: Policy positions, voter certainty, and party support in postcommunist Europe. The Journal of Politics, 76(2), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faye, J. P. (1972). Théorie du récit: Introduction aux langages totalitaires. Critique de la raison, l’économie narrative. Hermann.
   Google Scholar
• Federico, C. M., & Malka, A. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. N., & Wlezien, C. (1997). The responsive public: Issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 9(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692897009003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2001). Conclusion: Ideology balances and projections. In Reassessing political ideologies (pp. 193–208). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gencoglu Onbasi, F. (2016). ‘Radical social democracy’: A concept that has much to say to social democrats in Turkey. Contemporary Politics, 22(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2015.1112954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershkoff, A., & Kushner, S. (2005). Shaping public opinion: The 9/11-Iraq connection in the bush administration’s rhetoric. Perspectives on Politics, 3(3), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050334
   Google Scholar
• Gest, J. (2016). The new minority: White working class politics in an age of immigration and inequality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geurkink, B., Zaslove, A., Sluiter, R., & Jacobs, K. (2020). Populist attitudes, political trust, and external political efficacy: Old wine in new bottles? Political Studies, 68(1), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719842768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., Morales, L., & Ramiro, L. (2015). Varieties of radicalism. Examining the diversity of radical left parties and voters in Western Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation–The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gründl, J., & Aichholzer, J. (2020). Support for the populist radical right: Between uncertainty avoidance and risky choice. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunow, D., Begall, K., & Buchler, S. (2018). Gender ideologies in Europe: A multidimensional framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), 2009, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist, M. N., & Wiley, J. F. (2018). MplusAutomation: An R package for facilitating large-scale latent variable analyses in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 621–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1402334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Samuelsen, K. M. (2007). Advances in latent variable mixture models. IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. D. (2014). Laclau and Mouffe and the ontology of radical negativity. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 15(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.973895
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R., Littvay, L., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). The ideational approach to populism. Concept, theory, and analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2018). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessoula, M., Natili, M., & Pavolini, E. (2022). ‘Exclusionary welfarism’: A new programmatic agenda for populist right-wing parties? Contemporary Politics, 28(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.2011644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, C. M., Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2009). The End of equipotentiality: A moral foundations approach to ideology-attitude links and cognitive complexity. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2-3), 172–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903088882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Exceptions that prove the rule–using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Simon, L. (1999). Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance and other system-justifying attitudes. In Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 91–116). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603227-5
   Google Scholar
• Jungkunz, S. (2022). The nature and origins of political extremism In Germany and beyond. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83336-7
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R., & Hauwaert, S. M. V. (2020). The populist citizen: Empirical evidence from Europe and Latin America. European Political Science Review, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskintürk, T. (2022). The organization of political belief networks: A cross-country analysis. Social Science Research, 107, 102742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. (2006). Belief systems today. Critical Review, 18(1-3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochuyt, T., & Abts, K. (2017). Ongehoord populisme. Vlaams Belang kiezers over stad, migranten, welvaartsstaat, integratie en politiek. ASP editions.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and ideology in marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, C. M. (2019). Not So radical after all: Ideological diversity Among radical right supporters and its implications. Political Studies, 0032321719870468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719870468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1983). Radicalism or reformism: The sources of working-class politics. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y. T., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbers, M., & Coenders, M. (2017). Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe. European Union Politics, 18(1), 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116516678932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClosky, H., & Chong, D. (1985). Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400004221
   Google Scholar
• Meeusen, C., Meuleman, B., Abts, K., & Bergh, R. (2018). Comparing a variable-centered and a person-centered approach to the structure of prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, B., Swyngedouw, M., Abts, K., Meeusen, C., Stefanelli, A., Wopereis, D., & Van Den Abbeele, J. (2020). Belgian national election study 2019. Institute for Social and Political Opinion Research.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, A., & Jenkins, C. (2004). Structuring political opinions: Attitude consistency and democratic competence among the U.S. Mass Public. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 395–419.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (1995). Right-wing extremism analyzed. European Journal of Political Research, 27(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1995.tb00636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2010). The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics, 33(6), 1167–1186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.508901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8(3), 369–377; discussion 369-377. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02070.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthen, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz Barquero, P., Ruiz Jiménez, A. M., & González-Fernández, M. T. (2022). Ideological voting for radical right parties in Europe. Acta Politica, 57(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00213-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostiguy, P., & Casullo, M. E. (2017). Left versus right populism: Antagonism and the social other. PSA Annual International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Passarelli, G., & Tuorto, D. (2018). The five star movement: Purely a matter of protest? The rise of a new party between political discontent and reasoned voting. Party Politics, 24(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816642809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlović, T., Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2022). Two classes of political activists: Evidence from surveys of U.S. College students and U.S. prisoners. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2022.2064894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2017). How our political typology works. Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pilet, J.-B. (2021). Hard times for governing parties: The 2019 federal elections in Belgium. West European Politics, 44(2), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1750834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramiro, L. (2016). Support for radical left parties in Western Europe: Social background, ideology and political orientations. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. M. (2021). Populism and polarization in comparative perspective: Constitutive, spatial and institutional dimensions. Government and Opposition, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1956). Political and religious dogmatism: An alternative to the authoritarian personality. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(18), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093727
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2017). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, J. (2013). Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review, 5(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (2005). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, B., & Ajanovic, E. (2016). Hegemonic discourses of difference and inequality: Right-wing organisations in Austria. In G. Lazaridis, G. Campani, & A. Benveniste (Eds.), The rise of the Far right in Europe: Populist shifts and ‘othering’ (pp. 81–108). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55679-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Shearman, S. M., & Levine, T. R. (2006). Dogmatism updated: A scale revision and validation. Communication Quarterly, 54(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600877950
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J. (1985). Cognitive functioning and sociopolitical ideology revisited. Political Psychology, 6(4), 637–661. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovits, G. (2017). Centrist by comparison: Extremism and the expansion of the political spectrum. Political Behavior, 39(1), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9351-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. (2015). Gendering the vote for populist radical-right parties. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1-2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2015.1024404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. (2007). Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy shifts and political competition. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00243.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillie, J., & Fennema, M. (1998). A rational choice for the extreme right. Acta Politica, 33(3), 223–249.
   Google Scholar
• Tindall, C. (2022). Populism, culture and class: Articulation and performance in contemporary British populism. Contemporary Politics, 28(2), 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1953766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner, K., Leary, M. R., Asher, M. W., & Jongman-Sereno, K. P. (2013). Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: Extremity (Not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613494848
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Brug, W., Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2000). Anti-immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote? European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., Boiten, M., & Eendebak, L. (2015). Fear among the extremes: How political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215569706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-C., Deng, Q., Bi, X., Ye, H., & Yang, W. (2017). Performance of the entropy as an index of classification accuracy in latent profile analysis: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(11), 1473–1482. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01473
   Google Scholar
• Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, L. (2020). The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: Theory, evidence, and future directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar