Legitimising autocracy: re-framing the analysis of corporate relations to undemocratic regimes

References

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98(3), 808–842. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restropo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Democracy does cause growth. Journal of Political Economy, 127(11), 47–100. https://doi.org/10.1086/700936
   Google Scholar
• Asiedu, E., & Lien, D. (2011). Democracy, foreign direct investment, and natural resources. Journal of International Economics, 84(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslaksen, S. (2010). Oil and democracy: More than a cross-country correlation? Journal of Peace Research, 47(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310368348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baade, R. A., & Matheson, V. A. (2016). Going for the gold: The economics of the Olympics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babic, M., Fichtner, J., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2017). State versus corporations: Rethinking the power of business in international politics. International Spectator, 52(4), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1389151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caselli, F., & Tesei, A. (2016). Resource windfalls, political regimes, and political stability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 98(3), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, A., Kaplan, E., & Naidu, S. (2011). Coups, corporations, and classified information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1375–1409. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukalskis, A. (2015). Endorsing repression – Nonviolent movements and legitimizing regime violence in autocracies. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Montreal, August 26–29, 2015, https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/8375ff3e-eb14-4030-9fd5-61a7d2999001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dukalskis, A., & Gerschewski, J. (2017). What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edel, M., & Josua, M. (2018). How authoritarian rulers seek to legitimize repression: Framing mass killings in Egypt and Uzbekistan. Democratization, 25(5), 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2018.1439021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B., & Leblang, D. (2008). Democracy and globalization. Economics and Politics, 20(3), 289–334.
   Google Scholar
• Escribá-Folch, A. (2017). Foreign direct investment and the risk of regime transition in autocracies. Democratization, 24(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1200560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frynas, J. G. (2005). The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. International Affairs, 81(3), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, A., & Klann, N. H. (2013). Paying a visit: The Dalai Lama effect on international trade. Journal of International Economics, 91(2013), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. (2023). Exogenous shock and Russian studies. Post-Soviet Affairs, 39(1-2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2148814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2018). Legitimacy in autocracies: Oxymoron or essential feature? Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitmez, A. A., & Sonin, K. (2023). The dictator’s dilemma: A theory of propaganda and repression. Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2023-67. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Gjerløw, H., & Knutsen, C. H. (2019). Leaders, private interests, and socially wasteful projects: Skyscrapers in democracies and autocracies. Political Research Quarterly, 72(2), 504–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919840710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidolin, M., & La Ferrara, E. (2007). Diamonds are forever, wars are not: Is conflict bad for private firms? American Economic Review, 97(5), 1978–1993. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guriev, S., & Treisman, D. (2019). Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(4), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydemann, S., & Leenders, R. (2011). Authoritarian learning and authoritarian resilience: Regime responses to the ‘Arab awakening’. Globalizations, 8(5), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0016
   Google Scholar
• Kim, N. K. (2022). Foreign direct investment and democratic survival: A sectoral approach. Democratization, 29(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1950143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, I. (2020). Too big to fault? Effects of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize on Norwegian exports to China and foreign policy. International Political Science Review, 41(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118808610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2016). Does democracy reduce corruption? Democratization, 23(7), 1198–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1071797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2018). Diversification and democracy. International Political Science Review, 39(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116679833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutz, C. (2000). Complicity. Ethics and law for a collective age. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Owen, E., & Mitchell, A. (2018). Why do democracies attract more or less foreign investment? A metaregression analysis. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Resnick, A. (2003). Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct inflows to developing countries. International Organization, 57(1), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2003). Economic globalization and democracy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 33(01), 29–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000024
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, A., & Singh, K. (2013). Foreign direct investment, corruption, and democracy. Applied Economics, 45(8), 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.613786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, H. E. (2018). The neutrality myth: Why international sporting associations and politics cannot be separated. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 45(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2018.1479190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. (2001). Achieving democracy. Ethics & International Affairs, 15(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00340.x
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2023). Formal models of authoritarian regimes: A critique. Perspectives on Politics, 21(3), 979–988. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722002067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripstein, A. (2004). Authority and coercion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(1), 2–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. L. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53(3), 325–361. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2001.0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudra, N. (2005). Globalization and the strengthening of democracy in the developing world. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 704–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Economic integration, democracy and the welfare state. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaxson, N. (2007). Poisoned wells: The dirty politics of African oil. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenberg, M., Bernhard, M., Gerschewski, J., Lürhmann, A., & van Soest, C. (2019). Regime legitimation strategies (RLS) 1900 to 2018. Working paper 2019:86. Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenberg, M., Bernhard, M., Gerschewski, J., Lürhmann, A., & van Soest, C. (2021). Claiming the right to rule: Regime legitimation strategies from 1900 to 2019. European Political Science Review, 13(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyen, K., & Gerschewski, J. (2018). Legitimacy and protest under authoritarianism. Explaining Student Mobilization in Egypt and Morocco During the Arab Uprising. Democratization, 25(1), 38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tsourapas, G. (2021). Global autocracies: Strategies of transnational repression, legitimation, and co-optation in world politics. International Studies Review, 23(3), 616–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, K. K. (2011). More oil, less democracy: Evidence from worldwide crude oil discoveries. Economic Journal, 121(551), 89–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenar, L. (2008). Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00122.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F. (2010). The duty to protect: Corporate complicity, political responsibility, and human rights advocacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0447-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wettstein, F. (2012). Silence as complicity: Elements of a corporate duty to speak out against the violation of human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20122214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, A., & Kolstad, I. (2010). Multinational corporations and host country institutions: A case study of CSR activities in Angola. International Business Review, 19(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar