1,001
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Are Latin American populists more likely to introduce direct democracy?

&
Pages 456-472 | Received 17 Jan 2023, Accepted 13 Dec 2023, Published online: 29 Dec 2023

References

  • Altman, D. (2010). Direct democracy worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
  • Balderacchi, C. (2017). Participatory mechanisms in Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela: Deepening or undermining democracy? Government and Opposition, 52(1), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.26
  • Barr, R. R. (2009). Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics, 15(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890
  • Brambor T., Clark, W. R., Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014
  • Breuer, A. (2007). Institutions of direct democracy and accountability in Latin America’s presidential democracies. Democratization, 14(4), 554–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701398287
  • Cameron, C. A., & Trivedi, P. (2013). Regression analysis of count data. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
  • Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
  • Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538
  • Carlin, R. E., Hartlyn, J., Hellwig, T., Love, G. J., Martinez-Gallardo, C., & Singer, M. M. (2019). Executive Approval Database 2.0. https://www.executiveapproval.org
  • Corrales, J. (2016). Can anyone stop the president? Power asymmetries and term limits in Latin America, 1984-2016. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(2), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00308.x
  • De La Torre, C. (2010). Populist seduction in Latin America. 2nd ed. Ohio University Press.
  • Di Tella, T. (1965). Populism and reform in Latin America. In C. Véliz (Ed.), Obstacles to change in Latin America (pp. 47–73). Oxford University Press.
  • Durán-Martínez, A. (2012). Presidents, parties, and referenda in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 45(9), 1159–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011434010
  • Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, fascism, and national populism. Tansaction.
  • Gherghina, S., & Pilet, J. B. (2021). Do populist parties support referendums? A comparative analysis of election manifestos in Europe. Electoral Studies, 74, 102419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102419
  • Gherghina, S., & Silagadze, N. (2020). Populists and referendums in Europe: Dispelling the myth. Political Quarterly, 91(4), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12934
  • Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is chávez populist?: Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721
  • Hawkins, K. A., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Introduction: The ideational approach. In K. A. Hawkins, R. E. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. Rovira Kaltwasser (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
  • Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. 3rd Ed. Stanford University Press.
  • Hochstetler, K. (2006). Rethinking presidentialism: Challenges and presidential falls in South America. Comparative Politics, 38(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/20434009
  • Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. John Wiley.
  • Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2016). Friend or Foe? Testing the influence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America. Political Studies, 64(4), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12219
  • Hug, S., & Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players and referendums around the world. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14(4), 465–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/095169280201400404
  • Inglehart, R. (2015 [1977]). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles Among western publics. Princeton University Press.
  • Jacobs, K., Akkerman, A., & Zaslove, A. (2018). The voice of populist people? Referendum preferences, practices and populist attitudes. Acta Politica, 53(4), 517–541. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0105-1
  • Juon, A., & Bochsler, D. (2020). Hurricane or fresh breeze? Disentangling the populist effect on the quality of democracy. European Political Science Review, 12(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000259
  • Kenny, P. D. (2020). The enemy of the people’: Populists and press freedom. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918824038
  • Leemann, L., & Wasserfallen, F. (2016). The democratic effect of direct democracy. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000307
  • Levitsky, S., & Loxton, J. (2013). Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, 20(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738864
  • Levitsky, S., & Roberts, K. M. (2011). The resurgence of the Latin American left. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318
  • Linz, J. J. (1990). The perils of presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51–69.
  • Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2019). Manual POLITY IV PROJECT: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2018 Dataset Users’ Manual. In Polity IV Project.
  • McGrath, L. F. (2015). Estimating onsets of binary events in panel data. Political Analysis, 23(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpv019
  • Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In Y. Mény, & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 1–21). Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Mohrenberg, S., Huber, R. A., & Freyburg, T. (2021). Love at first sight? Populist attitudes and support for direct democracy. Party Politics, 27(3), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819868908
  • Morel, L., & Quortrup, M. (2017). Introduction. In L. Morel, & M. Quortrup (Eds.), The routledge handbook to referendums and direct democracy (pp. 1–7). Routledge.
  • Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). Populism in Europe and the americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge University Press.
  • Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018789490
  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). What Is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Murillo, M. V., Oliveros, V., & Vaishnav, M. (2010). Dataset on Political Ideology of Presidents and Parties in Latin America. Columbia University. http://mariavictoriamurillo.com/data/
  • Negretto, G. L. (2013). Making constitutions: Presidents, parties, and institutional choice in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2015). Participatory populism: Theory and evidence from bolivarian Venezuela. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915592183
  • Rooduijn, M. (2013). The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition, 49(4), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2013.30
  • Ruth, S. P. (2018). Populism and the erosion of horizontal accountability in Latin America. Political Studies, 66(2), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723511
  • Ruth-Lovell, S. P., & Grahn, S. (2023). Threat or corrective to democracy? The relationship between populism and different models of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 62(3), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12564
  • Samuels, D. J., & Shugart, M. S. (2003). Presidentialism, elections and representation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692803151002
  • Scarrow, S. E. (2001). Direct democracy and institutional change: A comparative investigation. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034006003
  • Setälä, M. (1999). Referendums in Western Europe - A wave of direct democracy? Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(4), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00022
  • Shugart, M. S., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and assemblies. Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Stanley, B. (2008). The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822289
  • The World Bank Group. (n.d.). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
  • Welp, Y. (2022). The will of the people: Populism and citizen participation in Latin America. De Gruyter.
  • Welp, Y., & Ruth, S. P. (2017). The motivations behind the Use of direct democracy. In S. P. Ruth, Y. Welp, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Let the people rule? Direct democracy In the twenty-first century (pp. 99–119). ECPR Press.
  • Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412