Have a little faith in deliberation? Examining the effect of participation in a citizens’ assembly on populist attitudes

References

• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen, S. (2017). Legitimacy from decision-making influence and outcome favourability: Results from general population survey experiments. Political Studies, 65(1_suppl), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716667956
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., & Warren, M. E. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, A. G., Van Der Pols, J. C., & Dobson, A. J. (2005). Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(1), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beiser-McGrath, L. F., Huber, R. A., Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2022). Parliament, people or technocrats? Explaining mass public preferences on delegation of policymaking authority. Comparative Political Studies, 55(4), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2023). Integrating citizen deliberation into climate governance: Lessons on robust design from six climate assemblies. Public Administration, 101(1), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2019). Building faith in democracy: Deliberative events, political trust and efficacy. Political Studies, 67(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718761466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12(4), 398–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caluwaerts, D. (2016). Evaluatierapport: Publiek Debat over de Eindtermen. Vlaamse Overheid.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., Littvay, L. (2020). An empirical comparison of seven populist attitudes scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curato, N., & Parry, L. J. (2018). Deliberation in democracy’s dark times. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.304
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Bächtiger, A., Chambers, S., Cohen, J., Druckman, J. N., Felicetti, A., Fishkin, J. S., Farrell, D. M., Fung, A., Gutmann, A., Landemore, H., Mansbridge, J., Marien, S., Neblo, M. A., Niemeyer, S., Setälä, M., Slothuus, R., Suiter, J., Thompson, D., & Warren, M. E. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S., & Escobar, O. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of democratic innovation and governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Floridia, A. (2014). Beyond participatory democracy, towards deliberative democracy: Elements of a possible theoretical genealogy. Rivista italiana di scienza politica, 44(3), 299–326.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2018). The lessons and limitations of experiments in democratic deliberation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113639
   Google Scholar
• Gelders Burgerberaad Klimaat. (2023). Gelders burgerberaad klimaat 2023 en verder. Samen voor de toekomst. https://media.gelderland.nl/Gelders_Burgerberaad_Klimaat_2023_en_verder_digitaal_d8e835738e.pdf?updated_at=2023-01-30T10:45:10.689Z
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. (2019). Mini-publics: Design choices and legitimacy. In S. Elstub & O. Escobar (Eds.), Handbook of democratic innovation and governance (pp. 45–59). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R., & Wegscheider, C. (2020). Disentangling how populism and radical host ideologies shape citizens’ conceptions of democratic decision-making. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2017). On the distinct effects of left-wing and right-wing populism on democratic quality. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet, V., & van der Does, R. (2021). The consequences of deliberative minipublics: Systematic overview, conceptual gaps, and new directions. Representation, 57(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1778513
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P. A., Espejo, P. O., & Ostiguy, P. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katsambekis, G. (2019). The populist radical left in Greece. Syriza in opposition and in power. In G. Katsambekis & A. Kioupkiolis (Eds.), The populist radical left in Europe (pp. 21–46). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2015). A minimalist definition of deliberation. In P. Heller & R. Vijayendra (Eds.), Deliberation and development: Rethinking the role of voice and collective action in unequal societies (pp. 27–50). World Bank Group.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos-Marne, H., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Borah, P. (2023). What do we (not) know about demand-side populism? A systematic literature review on populist attitudes. European Political Science, 22(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-022-00397-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, A. (2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, 77(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.3917/risa.772.0275
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, C. D., & Mendelberg, T. (2013). Political deliberation. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, & J. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 699–734). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruth-Lovell, S. P., & Grahn, S. (2023). Threat or corrective to democracy? The relationship between populism and different models of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 62(3), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. A. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theuwis, M., van Ham, C., & Jacobs, K. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effects of democratic innovations on citizens in advanced industrial democracies [ConstDelib Working Paper Series, No. 15 / 2021]. https://constdelib.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/WP15-2021-CA17135.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van der Does, R., & Jacquet, V. (2023). Small-scale deliberation and mass democracy: A systematic review of the spillover effects of deliberative minipublics. Political Studies, 71(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217211007278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Lefevere, J. (2023). Can the use of minipublics backfire? Examining how policy adoption shapes the effect of minipublics on political support among the general public. European Journal of Political Research, 62(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, W. (2015). Climate change scepticism: A conceptual re-evaluation. Sage Open, 5(2), 215824401557972. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015579723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, H. (2020). If I'll win it, I want it: The role of instrumental considerations in explaining public support for referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, H., & Jacobs, K. (2022). Are populists sore losers? Explaining populist citizens’ preferences for and reactions to referendums. British Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslove, A., Geurkink, B., Jacobs, K., & Akkerman, A. (2021). Power to the people? Populism, democracy, and political participation: A citizen's perspective. West European Politics, 44(4), 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1776490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar