Public Parliamentary Activities and Open Methods of Coordination

References

• Armstrong, K. A. (2005). How open is the United Kingdom to the OMC process on social inclusion? In J. Zeitlin & P. Pochet, with L. Magnusson (Eds.), The open method of co-ordination in action: The European employment and social inclusion (pp. 287–310). Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2007). Accountable multilevel governance by the open method of coordination? European Law Journal, 14, 505–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchs, M. (2008a). The open method of coordination as a two-level game. Policy and Politics, 36, 21–37. doi: 10.1332/030557308783431689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchs, M. (2008b). How legitimate is the open method of co-ordination? Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 765–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2000). Presidency conclusions. Brussels: Lisbon European Council.
   Google Scholar
• De La Porte, C. (2010). State of the art, overview of concepts, indicators and methodologies used for analyzing the social OMC. Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe, REC-WP 15/2010.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R. (2010). EU soft law and the functioning of representative democracy: The use of methods of open coordination by Dutch and British parliamentarians. Journal of European Public Policy, 17, 874–890. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2010.486996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R. (2013a). Full disclosure? The open method of coordination, parliamentary debates and media coverage. European Union Politics, 14, 95–114. doi: 10.1177/1465116512458836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, R. (2013b). Under the radar? National parliaments and the ordinary legislative procedure in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 1196–1212. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.760328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duina, F., & Raunio, T. (2007). The open method of co-ordination and national parliaments: Further marginalization or new opportunities? Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 489–506. doi: 10.1080/13501760701314318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, A. (2011). New modes of governance: Trustworthy responsiveness. Government and Opposition, 46, 81–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2010.01331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2000, November 1). Session European Standing Committee. Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2006, March 27). Plenary debate. Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K. (2005). Trying to reform the best pupils in the class? The open method of co-ordination in Sweden and Denmark. In J. Zeitlin & P. Pochet, with L. Magnusson (Eds.), The open method of co-ordination in action: The European employment and social inclusion strategies (pp. 107–136). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, S. (2009). The effectiveness of soft governance in the field of European anti-poverty policy: Operationalisation and empirical evidence. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11, 197–211. doi: 10.1080/13876980902888061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail, E. (2010). Examining the impact of the open method of coordination on sub-state employment and social inclusion policies: Evidence from the UK. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 364–378. doi: 10.1177/0958928710374377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. O. (2005). The Europeanisation of media discourse: A study of quality press coverage of economic policy co-ordination since Amsterdam. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43, 121–148. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. (2010). Accountability and multi-level governance: More accountability, less democracy? West European Politics, 33, 1030–1049. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. (2006). Does OMC really benefit national parliaments? European Law Journal, 12, 130–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00310.x
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Parliamentary questioning in 17 European parliaments: Some steps towards comparison. Journal of Legislative Studies, 16, 215–232. doi: 10.1080/13572331003740115
   Google Scholar
• Smismans, S. (2008). New modes of governance and the participatory myth. West European Politics, 31, 874–895. doi: 10.1080/01402380802234540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. (2010). The career of the open method of coordination: Lessons from a ‘soft’ EU instrument. West European Politics, 33, 93–117. doi: 10.1080/01402380903354122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakatika, M. (2007). A parliamentary dimension for EU soft governance. Journal of European Integration, 29, 549–564. doi: 10.1080/07036330701694873
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (2008, April 23). Verslag van een algemeen overleg (26 695 Nr. 51). Retrieved from www.overheid.nl
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. (2009, March 23). Verslag van een schriftelijk overleg (21 501-34, Nr. 118). Retrieved from www.overheid.nl
   Google Scholar
• Visser, J. (2005). The OMC as selective amplifier for national strategies of reform: What the Netherlands wants to learn from Europe. In J. Zeitlin & P. Pochet, with L. Magnusson (Eds.), The open method of co-ordination in action: The European employment and social inclusion strategies (pp. 173–215). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Weishaupt, J. T. (2009). Money, votes or ‘good’ ideas? Partisan politics and the effectiveness of the European Employment Strategy in Austria and Ireland. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 13. Retrieved from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-014a.htm
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. (2008). The open method of co-ordination and the governance of the Lisbon strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 436–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00785.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar