The European Parliament’s oversight powers in economic governance: proper scrutiny or a play to the gallery?

References

• Bailer, S. (2011). People’s voice or information pool? The role of, and reasons for, parliamentary questions in the Swiss parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 302–314. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2011.595123
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, K. (1995). Political control versus expertise: Congressional choices about administrative procedures. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 62–73. doi: 10.2307/2083075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., & Chelotti, N. (2016). The shadow of the European council: Understanding legislation on economic governance. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 511–525. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1178251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bressanelli, E., & Chelotti, N. (2018). The European Parliament and economic governance: Explaining a case of limited influence. Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 72–89. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2018.1444627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2013). European agencies: Law and practices of accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, R., McCubbins, M. D., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 588–611. doi: 10.2307/2111064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2014). Bicameralism, nationality and party cohesion in the European Parliament. Party Politics, 22(6), 773–783. doi: 10.1177/1354068814563972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Parra, S. (2017). The economic dialogue: An effective accountability mechanism? In L. Daniele, P. Simone, & R. Cisotto (Eds.), Democracy in the EMU in the Aftermath of the crisis (pp. 101–120). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dionigi, M. K. (2017). Lobbying in the European Parliament. The battle for influence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dionigi, M. K., & Koop, C. (2019). Losing out on substance but winning procedurally? The European Parliament and accountability in crisis legislation. West European Politics, early online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, G. (1994). The next steps agencies, political salience and the arm’s length principle. Public Administration, 72(2), 219–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1994.tb01009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). Political leadership and bureaucratic autonomy: Effects of agencification. Governance, 22(4), 673–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). EU financial assistance. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/eu-financial-assistance_en
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2008). Committee on employment and social affairs, ‘draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council establishing a European Training Foundation (recast). 2007/0163(COD).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2011). European Parliament amendments adopted on 23 June 2011 to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area (COM(2010)0524 – C7-0298/2010–2010/0278(COD)). OJEU C 390 E, 18 December 2012, pp. 111–120.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2017). Economic dialogues and exchanges of views with member states under the European semester cycles. Briefing. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2014/497736/IPOL-ECON_NT(2014)497736_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. (2013). Intergovernmentalism and Its Limits: Assessing the European Union’s answer to the Euro crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1003–1029. doi: 10.1177/0010414013489502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasone, C. (2014). European economic governance and parliamentary representation: What place for the European Parliament? European Law Journal, 20(2), 164–185. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, N., & Durán, I. P. (2016). The European Parliament oversight of EU agencies through written questions. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1349–1366. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1076875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (2017). The increasing institutional power of the European Parliament and eu policy making. Working Paper Series, Institute for European Integration Research, Working Paper Number 01/2017.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Moury, C., Schoeller, M. G., Meissner, K. L., & Mota, I. (2015). The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., Scully, R., & Farrell, D. (2012). National or European Parliamentarians? Evidence from a New Survey of members of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(4), 670–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02250.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, R. (2005). The power of opposition parliamentary party groups in European scrutiny. Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3–4), 428–445. doi: 10.1080/13572330500273711
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B., Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2013). Parliamentary questions, oversight and national opposition stats in the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 259–282. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chigago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kathleen, B. (1995). Political control Versus expertise: Congressional choices about administrative procedures. The American Political Science Review, 89(1), 62–73. doi: 10.2307/2083075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C. (2011). Explaining the accountability of independent agencies: The importance of political salience. Journal of Public Policy, 31(2), 209–234. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X11000080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C. (2014). Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability. Public Administration, 92(3), 565–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Webb, M. (2019). European Parliament resolutions – Effective agenda setting or whistling in the wind. Journal of European Integration, 41(3), 383–404. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2019.1599880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriner, D., & Schickler, E. (2008). Divided government and Congressional investigations. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33(2), 295–322. doi: 10.3162/036298008784310993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriner, D., & Schickler, E. (2014). Investigating the president: Committee probes and presidential approval, 1953–2006. Journal of Politics, 76(2), 521–534. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613001448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewallen, J., Theriault, S. M., & Jones, B. D. (2016). Congressional dysfunction: An information processing perspective. Regulation & Governance, 10(2), 179–190. doi: 10.1111/rego.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2006). The Broken branch: How Congress is failing America and how to get it back on track. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, T. E., & Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Maricut-Akbik, A. (2018). Holding the supervisor to account: The European Parliament and the European Central Bank in banking supervision. Jacques Delors Institute/Bertelsmann Stiftung, 19 November 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2005). Coalition policymaking and legislative review. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 93–106. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165–179. doi: 10.2307/2110792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. J. (2013). Congressional oversight hearings and policy control. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38(3), 353–380. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding power to account. Accountability in modern democracies. Basingstole: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, M., Salines, M., & Wieczorek, M. (2016). The European Parliament’s strategy in EU economic and financial reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(29), 217–235. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1025091
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C. W., & Dull, M. (2013). The weaponization of Congressional oversight: The watchful eye, 1947–2010. In S. A. Frisch, & S. Q. Kelly (Eds.), Politics to the extreme: American political institutions in the 21st century (pp. 47–70). New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2010). Parliamentary questions and oversight in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 53–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01919.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E. (1994). Question time in the Norwegian storting: Theoretical and empirical considerations. In M. Wiberg (Ed.), Parliamentary control in the Nordic countries: Forms of questioning and behavioural trends (pp. 247–275). Finish Political Science Association: Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. B. (2018). Accountability challenges in EU economic governance? Parliamentary scrutiny of the European semester. Journal of European Integration, 40(3), 341–357. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2018.1451523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. B., & Dionigi, M. K. (2018). National parliaments’ use of the political dialgoue: Institutional lobbyists, traditionalists, or communicators? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(5), 1108–1126. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation (EU) No. 1173/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the effective enforcement of budgetary surveillance in the euro area, Official Journal of the European Union, L 306/8-11, 23.11.2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ringe, N. (2010). Who decides, and how?: Preferences, uncertainty, and policy choice in the European Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ringquist, E. J., Worsham, J., & Eisner, M. A. (2003). Saliency, complexity, and the legislative direction of regulatory bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 141–164. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mug013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2014). Integration without representation? The European Parliament and the reform of economic governance in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1174–1183. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg, O., & Hefftler, C. (2015). Introduction. In C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, J. Smith, & C. Hefftler (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of national parliaments and the European Union (pp. 1–43). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2000). Members of parliament and governments in Western Europe: Agency relations and problems of oversight. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 353–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2015). Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency area. In O. Cramme, & S. B. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic politics in a European Union under stress (pp. 19–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T., & Busuioc, M. (2015). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191–215. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Reinterpreting the rules ‘by Stealth’ in times of crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European commission. West European Politics, 39(5), 1032–1052. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeller, M., & Héritier, A. (2019). Driving Informal institutional change: The European Parliament and the reform of the economic and monetary Union. Journal of European Integration, 41(5), 277–292. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2019.1599373
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg, M. (1995). Parliamentary questioning: Control by communication? In H. Doring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 179–222). New York: St Martins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, A., & Vermeulen, M. (2011). Parliamentary oversight of security and intelligence agencies in the European Union. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/201109/20110927ATT27674/20110927ATT27674EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yordanova, N. (2009). Rationale behind committee assignment in the European Parliament: Distributive, informational and partisan perspectives. European Union Politics, 10(2), 253–280. doi: 10.1177/1465116509103377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar