Legislative committees in the Turkish Parliament: performing procedural minimum or effective scrutiny?

References

• Adler, E. S., & Wilkerson, J. D. (2013). Congress and the politics of problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• André, A., Depauw, S., & Martin, S. (2016). Trust is good, control is better: Multiparty government and legislative organization. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915623639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arter, D. (2004). The Scottish committees and the goal of a ‘new politics’: A verdict on the first four years of the devolved Scottish Parliament. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 12(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/1460846042000207097
   Google Scholar
• Auel, K. (2007). Democratic accountability and national parliaments: Redefining the impact of parliamentary scrutiny in EU affairs. European Law Journal, 13(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Leech, B. L., & Kimball, D. C. (2009). Lobbying and policy change. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Türkçe. (2015, August 14). Erdoğan: Turkish system is de facto changed [in Turkish]. Retrieved July 8, 2018, from https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2015/08/150814_erdogan_sistem
   Google Scholar
• Bektas, E. (2019). Executive-legislature relations in the Turkish presidential system and its effects on democracy [in Turkish]. Yasama Dergisi, 39(1), 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Bektas, E., & Issever-Ekinci, E. (2019). Who represents women in Turkey? An analysis of gender difference in private bill sponsorship in the 2011–15 Turkish parliament. Politics & Gender, 15(4), 851–881. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X18000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, T., Ecker, A., & Müller, W. C. (2013). How parties govern: Political parties and the internal organization of government. In W. C. Müller, & H. M. Narud (Eds.), Party governance and party democracy (pp. 33–50). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvecchi, A., & Simison, E. (2017). Legislative institutions and performance in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Politics, 49(4), 521–544. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517821273099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulut, A. T. (2020). What drives women’s substantive representation in muslim-majority countries? Lessons from Turkey. Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920948135
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2006). The analysis of Scottish Parliament committee influence: Beyond capacity and structure in comparing West European legislatures. European Journal of Political Research, 45(2), 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., & Cox, G. W. (2012). Shadowing ministers: Monitoring partners in coalition governments. Comparative Political Studies, 45(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011421309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaqués-Bonafont, L., & Muñoz Márquez, L. M. (2016). Explaining interest group access to parliamentary committees. West European Politics, 39(6), 1276–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1184862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciftci, S., Forrest, W., & Tekin, Y. (2008). Committee assignments in a nascent party system: The case of the Turkish Grand National Assembly. International Political Science Review, 29(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107088389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. P., Eising, R., Hermansson, H., & Spohr, F. (2021). Business interests, public interests, and experts in parliamentary committees: Their impact on legislative amendments in the German Bundestag. West European Politics, 44(2), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1672025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E. (1995). How parties control committee members. In H. Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe (pp. 308–324). Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dorronsoro, G., & Massicard, E. (2005). Being a member of parliament in contemporary Turkey. European Journal of Turkish Studies, 3, 1–31. https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/502
   Google Scholar
• Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581–1606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gençkaya, Ö. F. (1999). Reforming parliamentary procedure in Turkey. In Ö. F. Gençkaya, R. Keleş, & Y. Hazama (Eds.), Aspects of Democratization in Turkey (pp. 2–21). Institute of Developing Economies.
   Google Scholar
• Gençkaya, Ö. F. (2000). Parliamentary refom in Turkey: An historical assessment [in Turkish]. In I. Turan (Ed.), Effectiveness of GNAT [in Turkish] (pp. 31–62). TESEV Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, W., & Ozbudun, E. (2009). Islamism, democracy and liberalism in Turkey: The case of the AKP. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kabasakal, M. (2014). Factors influencing intra-party democracy and membership rights: The case of Turkey. Party Politics, 20(5), 700–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812453366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (1990). Cyclical breakdown, redesign and nascent institutionalization: The Turkish Grand National Assembly. In U. Liebert, & M. Cotta (Eds.), Parliament and democratic consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey (pp. 184–222). Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. L., Barkan, J. D., Turan, I., & Jewell, M. E. (1984). The legislative connection: The politics of representation in Kenya, Korea, and Turkey. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H., & Loewenberg, G. (2005). The role of parliamentary committees in coalition governments: Keeping tabs on coalition partners in the German Bundestag. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1104–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005276307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1976). Modes of executive-legislative relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.2307/439626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krol, G. (2017). Legislative performance of the Russian State Duma: The role of parliament in an authoritarian regime. East European Politics, 33(4), 450–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1346504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krol, G. (2020). Amending legislatures in authoritarian regimes: Power sharing in post-Soviet Eurasia. Democratization, 28(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1830065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, P. (2005). The European Union and grassroots democratization in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 6(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840500235456
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, C. (2014). The iron law of Erdogan: The decay from intra-party democracy to personalistic rule. Third World Quarterly, 35(9), 1672–1690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.970866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, J. D., & Shaw, M. (1979). Committees in legislatures: A comparative analysis. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. (2010). Public bill committees: An assessment scrutiny sought, scrutiny gained. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(3), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longley, L. D., & Davidson, R. H. (1998). Parliamentary committees: Changing perspectives on changing institutions. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420537
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., & Schuler, P. (2010). Nodding vs needling: Analyzing delegate responsiveness in an authoritarian parliament. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 482–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2005). Coalition policymaking and legislative review. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2011). Parliaments and coalitions: The role of legislative institutions in multiparty governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., & Vanberg, G. (2014). Parties and policymaking in multiparty governments: The legislative median, ministerial autonomy, and the coalition compromise. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 979–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson, I., & Strøm, K. (1995). Parliamentary committees. In H. Döring (Ed.), Parliaments and majority rule in Western Europe (pp. 249–307). Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, M. L. (1979). Comparative legislatures. Vol. 6. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musil, P. A. (2011). Authoritarian party structures and democratic political setting in Turkey. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, B. (2017). Amending budget bills in the Russian State Duma. Post-Communist Economies, 29(4), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2017.1333791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, B. (2020). Authoritarian amendments: Legislative institutions as intraexecutive constraints in Post-Soviet Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 53(9), 1417–1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018797941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öktem, K., & Akkoyunlu, K. (2016). Exit from democracy: Illiberal governance in Turkey and beyond. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1253231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. M., & Mezey, M. L. (1991). Legislatures in the policy process: The dilemmas of economic policy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. (1996). Democratization in the Middle East: Turkey, how far from consolidation? Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Cowley, P. (2016). The policy power of the Westminster parliament: The “parliamentary state” and the empirical evidence. Governance, 29(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Gover, D. (2017). Legislation at Westminster: Parliamentary actors and influence in the making of British law. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., Gover, D., & Wollter, K. (2016). Does the executive dominate the Westminster legislative process? Six reasons for doubt. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(2), 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T., & Strøm, K. W. (2014). Political parties and legislators. In T. Saalfeld, K. W. Strøm, & S. Martin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies (pp. 371–398). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. (1998). Parliamentary committees: A global perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420547
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, M., & Cairney, P. (2005). The impact of the Scottish Parliament in amending executive legislation. Political Studies, 53(2), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00530.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1990). Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1998). Parliamentary committees in European democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420538
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, K., Müller, W. C., & Smith, D. M. (2010). Parliamentary control of coalition governments. Annual Review of Political Science, 13(1), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.104340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2013). More of the same or a period of change? The impact of bill committees in the twenty-first century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs, 66(3), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2014). Evidence taking under the microscope: How has oral evidence affected the scrutiny of legislation in House of Commons committees? British Politics, 9(4), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2014.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truex, R. (2016). Making autocracy work: Representation and responsiveness in modern China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, I. (2000). Effectiveness of GNAT [in Turkish]. TESEV Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, I. (2003). Volatility in politics, stability in parliament: An impossible dream? The Turkish Grand National Assembly during the last two decades. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 9(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357233032000250671
   Google Scholar