District candidacies for the German Bundestag: what spurs or hampers intra-party competition?

References

• Ansolabehere, S., Hansen, J. M., Hirano, S., & Synder, J. M. (2007). The incumbency advantage in U.S. Primary elections. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylott, N., & Bolin, N. (2017). Managed intra-party democracy: Precursory delegation and party leader selection. Party Politics, 23(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816655569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, M., Debus, M., & Klingelhöfer, T. (2017). Keeping one’s seat: The Competitiveness of MP renomination in mixed-member electoral systems. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 979–994. https://doi.org/10.1086/690945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, H., & Wolf, C. (2010). Logistische Regression. In C. Wolf, & H. Best (Eds.), Handbuch der sozialwissen schaftlichen Datenanalyse (pp. 827–854). Springer VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Borchert, J., & Stolz, K. (2003). Die Bekämpfung der Unsicherheit: Politikerkarrieren und Karrierepolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 44(2), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-003-0036-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., & Coller, X. (2018). Democratizing candidate selection. New methods, old receipts? Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W., & Pruysers, S. (2019). Sore losers? The costs of intra-party democracy. Party Politics, 25(4), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817728216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodeigne, J., & Pilet, J. B. (2021). Centralized or decentralized personalization? Measuring intra-party competition in open and flexible list PR systems. Party Politics, 27(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855710 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L., & Carty, R. K. (1991). Parties and candidate selection in the 1988 Canadian general election. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900005114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Marsh, M. (1988). Candidate selection in comparative perspective. The secret garden of politics. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within parties. Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höhne, B. (2013). Rekrutierung von Abgeordneten des Europäischen Parlaments. Organisation, Akteure und Entscheidungen in Parteien. Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Kannenberg, O., & Hellmann, D. (2019). Zwischen Karriere und Pflichtbewusstsein – die Motivation von Zählkandidaten. Zeitschrift für Parteienwissenschaften, 25(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.25838/oaj-mip-201941-50
   Google Scholar
• Kenig, O. (2009). Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests? Electoral Studies, 28(2), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O., Rahat, G., & Tuttnauer, O. (2015). Competitiveness of party leadership selection processes. In W. P. Cross, & J. B. Pilet (Eds.), The politics of party leadership: A cross-national perspective (pp. 50–72). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1967). Politicians’ beliefs about voters. American Political Science Review, 61(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küppers, A. (2021). Effects of party primaries in German regional party branches. German Politics, 30(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2020.1748602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J. (2016). The supply and demand model of candidate selection: Some reflections. Government and Opposition, 51(3), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manow, P. (2007). Electoral rules and legislative turnover: Evidence from Germany’s mixed electoral system. West European Politics, 30(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manow, P., & Nistor, M. (2009). Wann ist ein Listenplatz sicher? Eine Untersuchung der Bundestagswahlen 1953 bis 2002. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 40(3), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2009-3-603
   Google Scholar
• Niedermayer, O. (2018). Parteimitgliedschaften im Jahre 2017. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 49(2), 346–371. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2018-2-346
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (1995). Political recruitment: Gender, race and class in the British parliament. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papp, Z. (2017). Candidate features and candidate selection patterns in Hungary, 1994–2010. International Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2018.1414507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, G., Hazan, R. Y., & Katz, R. S. (2008). Democracy and political parties: On the uneasy relationships between participation, competition and representation. Party Politics, 14(6), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, G., & Shapira, A. (2017). An intra-party democracy index: Theory, design and a demonstration. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1), 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, M. (2013). Ausmaß und Formen des innerparteilichen Wettbewerbs auf der Wahlkreisebene: Nominierung der Direktkandidaten für die Bundestagswahl 2009. In T. Faas, K. Arzheimer, S. Rossteucher, & B. Weßels (Eds.), Koalitionen, Kandidaten, Kommunikation (pp. 129–147). Springer VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, M. (2019). Wettbewerb, Proporz, Solidarität – die konkurrierenden Logiken informeller Regeln bei der innerparteilichen Kandidatenaufstellung. Zeitschrift für Parteienwissenschaften, 25(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.25838/OAJ-MIP-2019195-205
   Google Scholar
• Schendera, C. (2014). Regressionsanalyse mit SPSS. De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. (2020a). In den “geheimen Gärten” der Vorauswahl. Variationen der Listenaufstellung von CDU und SPD zum 19. Deutschen Bundestag. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 51(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2020-1-26
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. (2020b). More free-floating, less outward-looking. How more inclusive candidate selection procedures (could) matter. Party Politics OnlineFirst. http://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820926477
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, democracy. Impact Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schüttemeyer, S. S., & Sturm, R. (2005). Der Kandidat – das (fast) unbekannte Wesen. Befunde und Überlegungen zur Aufstellung der Bewerber zum Deutschen Bundestag. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 36(3), 539–553.
   Google Scholar
• Somit, A., Wildenmann, R., Boll, B., & Römmele, A. (1994). The victorious incumbent: Threat to democracy? Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• von dem Berge, B., & Poguntke, T. (2017). Varieties of intra-party democracy. Conceptualization and index construction. In S. Scarrow, P. D. Webb, & T. Poguntke (Eds.), Organizing political parties. Representation, participation, and power (pp. 136–157). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, A. C. (2018). Why are gender quota laws adopted by men? The role of inter- and intraparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 51(14), 1935–1973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weßels, B. (2016). Wahlkreiskandidaten und politischer Wettbewerb. In H. Schoen, & B. Weßels (Eds.), Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2013 (pp. 181–204). Springer VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., Jungherr, A., & Schoen, H. (2019). More than opinion expression: Secondary effects of intraparty referendums on party members. Party Politics, 25(6), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817745729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeuner, B. (1970). Kandidatenaufstellung zur Bundestagswahl 1965. Untersuchungen zur innerparteilichen Willensbildung und zur politischen Führungsauslese. Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Zeuner, B. (1973). Wahlen ohne Auswahl: Die Kandidatenaufstellung zum Bundestag. In W. Steffani (Ed.), Parlamentarismus ohne Transparenz (pp. 165–190). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar