Reviewing the review: a three-dimensional approach to analysing the 2017–2020 review of the House of Lords investigative and scrutiny committees

References

• Besly, N., & Goldsmith, T. (2019). How parliament works (8th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, C. (2021). Procedural justice: New approaches to parliament’s engagement with the public. Parliamentary Affairs, Advance Article, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab039
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, H., & Defty, A. (2010). A question of expertise, the House of Lords and welfare policy. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G. (2016). Critical junctures. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleleti, & A. Sheingate (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 90–106). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. (2015). The ‘wicked problems’ of governing UK health security disaster prevention, the case of pandemic influenza. Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, 24(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2014-0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J., Flinders, M., Judge, D., Torrance, M., & Tudor, P. (2022). Institutions ignored, a history of select committee scrutiny in the House of Lords. Parliamentary History, 41(3) forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, J., & Pyper, R. (2020). Developing capacity within the British civil service, the case of the stabilisation unit. Public Money & Management, 40(8), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1750797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Uyl, R. M., & Russel, D. J. (2018). Climate adaptation in fragmented governance settings, the consequences of reform in public administration. Environmental Politics, 27(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1386341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorey, P., & Purvis, M. (2018). Representation in the Lords. In C. Leston-Bandeira, & L. Thompson (Eds.), Exploring parliamen (pp. 244–254). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Electoral Reform Society. (2020). House of Lords: new peers briefing. https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/August-2020-New-Peers-Briefing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Exworthy, M., & Hunter, D. J. (2011). The challenge of joined-up government in tackling health inequalities. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.551749
   Google Scholar
• Flinders, M. (2000). The enduring centrality of individual ministerial responsibility within the British constitution. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 6(3), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330008420632
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. J., Goodwin, M., Holden Bates, S., & Sin, G. (2019). Conclusion: Prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamm, G., & Shepsle, K. (1989). Emergence of legislative institutions: Standing committees in the House and Senate 1810-1825. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/440091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. (2020). Dramas at Westminster. Select committees and the quest for accountability. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, B., McCrae, J., & Shepheard, M. (2018). Accountability in modern government, what are the issues? Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• HC 1803. (2019). Our planet, our health. Environmental Audit Committee. 21st Report of session 2017-19. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• HC 36. (2020). Oral evidence, preparations for coronavirus, 17 April. Health and Social Care Committee. House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• HL 103. (2020). Review of House of Lords investigative and scrutiny committee activity in 2019-20. Liaison Committee. 3rd report of session 2019-21. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 113. (2016). New investigative committee activity. Liaison Committee. 3rd report of session 2015-16. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 127. (2015). Review of select committee activity and proposals for new committee activity. Liaison Committee. 2nd report of session 2014-15. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 135. (2013). Review of select committee activity and proposals for new committee activity. Liaison Committee. 1st report of session 2012-13. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 136. (2011). Report of the leader’s group on working practices. Leader’s Group on Working Practices. Session 2010-12.
   Google Scholar
• HL 138-I. (2009). Are the Lords listening? Creating connections between people and parliament. Information Committee. 1st Report of Session 2008-09. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 140. (2020). Leave of absence, committee rotations etc. Procedure and Privileges Committee, 4th Report of session 2019-20. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 144. (2017). New investigative committees in the 2017-18 Session. Liaison Committee. 2nd report of session 2016-17. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 167. (2020). A critical juncture for public services, lessons from COVID-19. Public Services Committee. 1st Report of session 2019-21. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 183. (2021). Ageing, science, technology and healthy living. Science and Technology Select Committee. 1st Report of Session 2019-21. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 193. (2020). Review investigative and scrutiny committees, strengthening the thematic structure through the appointment of new committees. Liaison Committee. 5th Report of Session 2019-20. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 194. (1973). Select committee on procedures for scrutiny of proposals for European Instruments, 2nd Report of Session 1972–73.
   Google Scholar
• HL 263. (2021). Beyond digital: Planning for a hybrid world. House of Lords. COVID-19 Committee. 1st Report of Session 2019-21. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 279. (2012). Review of select committee activity and proposals for new committee activity. Liaison Committee. 3rd report of session 2010-12. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 35. (1992). Committee work of the house. Select Committee on the Committee Work of the House. Session 1991-92. Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• HL 398 (2019) Review of House of Lords investigative and scrutiny committees, towards a new thematic committee structure. Liaison Committee. 6th Report of Session 2017-19. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 47. (2015). An international relations committee. Liaison Committee. 2nd Report of Session 2015-16. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 5. (2015). Investigative select committees in the 2010-15 parliament. Liaison Committee. 1st report of session 2015-16. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 51. (2021). Beyond digital: the government response. COVID-19 Committee. 1st Report of Session 2021-22. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• HL 85. (2020). Hungry for change, fixing the failures in food. Select Committee on Food, Poverty, Health and the Environment, Report of Session 2019-20. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, A. (2021). Parliamentary scrutiny of treaties, an insider’s reflections. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3798586
   Google Scholar
• IPU. (2021). Global parliamentary report: Public engagement in the work of parliaments. Inter-Parliamentary Union.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, D. (2021). Walking the dark side, evading parliamentary scrutiny. The Political Quarterly, 92(2), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1976). Modes of executive-legislative relations: Great Britain, France and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/439626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leston-Bandeira, C. (2016). Why symbolic representation frames parliamentary public engagement. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(2), 498–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148115615029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leston-Bandeira, C., & Walker, A. (2018). Parliament and public engagement. In C. Leston-Bandeira, & L. Thompson (Eds.), Exploring parliament (pp. 308–321). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined–up government in the UK, dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80(4), 615–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, D. (2018). Select committees in the UK House of Lords: The economic affairs committee. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(4), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1540115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, L. D., & Davidson, R. H. (1998). Parliamentary committees: Changing perspectives on changing institutions. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420537
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2017). Institutionalism. In V. Lowndes, D. Marsh, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 54–74). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maer, L. (2019). Select committee reform, shifting the balance and pushing the boundaries. Parliamentary Affairs, 72(4), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, F. (2012). The capacity to co-ordinate – whitehall, governance and the challenge of climate change. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076711407104
   Google Scholar
• Milner, P. (2018). Scrutiny by the House of Lords. In C. Leston-Bandeira, & L. Thompson (Eds.), Exploring parliament (pp. 196–206). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (1998). Nascent institutionalisation: Committees in the British parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420543
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2007). Adding value? The role of second chambers. Asia Pacific Law Review, 15(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2007.11788164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2013). Parliament in British politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2017). Reform of the House of lords. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2019). Post-legislative scrutiny in the UK parliament, adding value. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1633778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2016). Institutionalism and public policy. In B. G. Peters, & P. Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy (pp. 57–72). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pieczka, M., & Escobar, O. (2013). Dialogue and science: Innovation in policy making and the discourse of public engagement in the UK. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyper, R. (2021). Public sector reform in the UK, Key developments, debates and political responses in challenging times. In J. Connolly, & A. van der Zwet (Eds.), Public value management, governance and reform in Britain (pp. 45–86). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. (2005). The concept of constituency: Political representation, democratic legitimacy, and institutional design. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romaniello, M. (2019). Bicameralism. Multiple theoretical roots in diverging practices. In R. Albert, A. Baraggia, & C. Fasone (Eds.), Constitutional reform of national legislatures (pp.16–36). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2005). The UK approach to delivering sustainable development, a case study in joined-up working. Journal of Environmental Law, 17(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/envlaw/eqi002
   Google Scholar
• Russel, D., Turnpenny, J., & Rayner, T. (2013). Reining in the executive? Delegation, evidence, and parliamentary influence on environmental public policy. Environment and Planning C, Government and Policy, 31(4), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11330
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2013). The contemporary House of Lords, Westminster Bicameralism revived. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2019). Bicameralism in an age of reform. In R. Albert, A. Baraggia, & C. Fasone (Eds.), Constitutional reform of national legislatures (pp. ix–xix). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Benton, M. (2009). Analysis of existing data on the breadth of expertise and experience in the House of Lords. Constitution Unit, London.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Cowley, P. (2018). Modes of executive-legislative relations revisited. The Political Quarterly, 89(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasse, T., Rutter, J., Norris, E., & Shepheard, M. (2020). Net zero. How government can meet its climate change target. Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Serra-Silva, S. (2021). How parliaments engage with citizens? Online public engagement: A comparative analysis of parliamentary websites. Journal of Legislative Studies, Early View. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1896451
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. (1998). Parliamentary committees: A global perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(1), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572339808420547
   Google Scholar
• Shell, D. (2007). The House of Lords. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, M. (2013). Select committees in the House of Lords. The Table, 81, 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, M., & Tudor, P. (2019). Select committees in the House of Lords. Research briefing. House of Lords library. House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., Russel, D., & Rayner, T. (2013). The complexity of evidence for sustainable development policy, analysing the boundary work of the UK parliamentary environmental audit committee. Transactions, 38(4), 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00549.x
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, P. (2008). Trust the experts? Lords of the Blog.
   Google Scholar
• Uhr, J. (2008). Bicameralism. In S. A. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 474–494). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2020). Coronavirus: Lessons learnt inquiry. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/657/coronavirus-lessons-learnt/
   Google Scholar
• UK Parliament. (2021). Nine parliamentary committees agree ‘Committee on COP26’ scrutiny arrangements. House of Commons. https://committees.parliament.uk/work/174/prepara.tion-for-cop-26/news/150568/nine-parliamentary-committees-agree-committee-on-cop26-scrutiny-arrangements-with-cop-president-designate-alok-sharma/
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A., Jurczak, N., Bochel, C., & Leston-Bandeira, C. (2019). How public engagement became a core part of the House of Commons select committees. Parliamentary Affairs, 72(4), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsz031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar