A new index of bicameralism: taking legitimacy seriously

References

• ABS – Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2020). National, state and territory population, as of June 2020. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/latest-release#states-and-territories (1.2.2021)
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., Baccaro, L., Fill, A., Galindo, J., Heeb, S., & Labanino, R. (2019). Liberalization database 1973–2013. http://liberalization.org
   Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., Engler, S., & Leemann, L. (2020). Comparative political data set 1960–2018. Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. https://www.cpds-data.org
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A. (2005). The real world of deliberation: A comparative study of its favorable conditions in legislatures. Paul Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A. (2014). Debate and deliberation in legislatures. In K. Strøm, T. Saalfeld, & S. Martin (Eds.), Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.013.0008
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Steiner, J. (2005). The deliberative dimensions of legislatures. Acta Politica, 40(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., & Sonnicksen, J. (Eds.). (2021). Federal democracies at work: Varieties of complex government. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J., & Vatter, A. (2019). Power diffusion and democracy: Institutions, deliberation and outcomes. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, U. (2010). Zwischen Selbstbeschränkung und Parteipolitik: die «Erste Kammer» der Niederlande. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 389–405). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, H., & Defty, A. (2012). A more representative chamber: Representation and the House of Lords. Journal of Legislative Studies, 18(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2012.646714
   Google Scholar
• Braune, F. (2010). Seanad Éireann – Die Zweite Kammer Irlands. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 433–450). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, E. (2017). Bicameralism. International IDEA constitution-building primer. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2002). Democratic institutions and regime survival: Parliamentary and presidential democracies reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.102301.084508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, C., Morisi, D., & De Angelis, A. (2016). Die falsche Strategie: wie Renzi den Erfolg des Verfassungsreferendums sabotiert hat. https://www.defacto.expert/2016/12/01/verfassungsreferendum-italien/
   Google Scholar
• Cordes, S., & Kleiner-Liebau, D. (2010). Der Spanische Senat – Wandel territorialer Repräsentation zwischen dezentralem Einheitsstaat und Föderalstaat. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 189–210). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Dandoy, R., Dodeigne, J., Reuchamps, M., & Vandeleene, A. (2015). The new Belgian Senate. A (dis)continued evolution of federalism in Belgium? Representation, 51(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2015.1108358
   Google Scholar
• Demos & Pi. (2016). Gli italiani e lo stato. http://www.demos.it/a01211.php
   Google Scholar
• Edip, A. (2018). Faut-il supprimer le Sénat? Capital.fr. https://www.capital.fr/polemik/faut-il-supprimer-le-senat-1268524
   Google Scholar
• Ehs, T., & Willroider, N. (2012). Forderungen und aktuelle Ideen zur Reform des österreichischen Parlamentarismus. In Forum Politische Bildung (Ed.), Das Parlament im österreichischen politischen System (pp. 37–46). Studien-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eith, U. M., & Siewert, B. (2010). Das «unechte» Unikat: der Deutsche Bundesrat. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 97–125). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Ettinger, M. (2019). The vastly varying importance of American voters. https://mettlinger.medium.com/the-vastly-varying-importance-of-american-voters-updated-and-revised-september-2019-cbf15169b26b
   Google Scholar
• Fallend, F. (2010). Der Bundesrat in Österreich. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 165–188). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Furey, G. J. H. (2017). The new senate: Still in transition. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 40(1), 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Fusaro, C. (2012). Bicameralism in Italy. 150 years of poor design, disappointing performances, aborted reforms. Working paper. http://www.carlofusaro.it/in_english/Bicameralism_in_ITA_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, W., & Kleiber, M. (2012). Das Regierungssystem der USA: Eine Einführung. Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Globe & Mail. (2013). https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/how-to-legitimize-canadas-senate/article8979559/
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts – A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, J., & Cannoot, P. (2015). Belgian federalism after the sixth state reform. Perspectives on Federalism, 7(2), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/pof-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, C. (2019). Das politische System Spaniens. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grafstein, R. (1981). The legitimacy of political institutions. Polity, 14(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, C. M. (2010a). Zweite Kammer erster Klasse: der US-Senat. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 25–59). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, C. M. (2010b). Australiens Senat im «Washminster»-System. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 76–96). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Harguindéguy, J.-B., Coller, X., & Cole, A. (2017). Why is the Spanish upper chamber so difficult to reform? Parliamentary Affairs, 70(3), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Osterkatz, S. C., Niedzwiecki, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring regional authority: A postfunctionalist theory of governance. Volume I. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hornig, E.-C. (2010). Der Senat in Italien – Eine Zweite Kammer mit föderaler Zukunft? In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 3–21). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• IFOP – Institut d’études opinion et marketing en France et à l’international. (2008). Le jugement des Français à l’égard du Sénat à 15 jours des élections sénatoriales. https://www.ifop.com/publication/le-jugement-des-francais-alegard-du-senat-a-15-jours-des-elections-senatoriales/
   Google Scholar
• IPU – Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2021). https://www.ipu.org
   Google Scholar
• Jun, U., & Leunig, S. (2009). 60 Jahre Bundesrat. Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Kempf, U. (2017). Das politische System Frankreichs. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2013). Democratic legitimacy: Is there a legitimacy crisis in contemporary politics? PVS, 54(4), 609–638. https://doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2013-4-609
   Google Scholar
• Leunig, S. (2009a). Der deutsche Bundesrat: Einzigartig, einflussreich, aber nicht unumstritten. In S. Leunig (Ed.), Handbuch föderale Zweite Kammern (pp. 95–113). Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Leunig, S. (2009b). Der schweizerische Ständerat: Eidgenössisch eigenständig. In S. Leunig (Ed.), Handbuch föderale Zweite Kammern (pp. 215–29). Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Leunig, S. (2009c). Der österreichische Bundesrat: Wenig potestas, kaum auctoritas. In S. Leunig (Ed.), Handbuch föderale Zweite Kammern (pp. 172–185). Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-Six countries. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, H. (2013). Ten reasons voters rejected the abolition of the Seanad. Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/ten-reasons-voters-rejected-the-abolition-of-the-seanad-1.1551909
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., & Vatter, A. (Eds.). (2020). Der Ständerat: Zweite Kammer der Schweiz. NZZ Libro.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, D. (2018). The new Senate voting system and the 2016 election. Parliament of Australia Research Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2020). Reform of the House of Lords. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novotný, L. (2018). Ein Machtgefüge in Bewegung? Parlament, Regierung und Präsident der Tschechischen Republik. In A. Lorenz, & H. Formánková (Eds.), Das politische System Tschechiens (pp. 111–129). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, M. (2018). The limits of democracy. Policy, 34(2), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Various data. https://data.oecd.org
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. (1996). The Czech senate: From constitutional inducement to electoral challenge. East European Constitutional Review, 5(4), 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, F. (2018). Beyond second chambers: Alternative representation of territorial interests and their reasons. Perspectives on Federalism, 10(2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0016
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y., & Warin, P. (2007). Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective? European Journal of Political Research, 46(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisella, J. (2013). The Canadian Senate: Legitimacy is the issue. https://www.americasquarterly.org/canadian-senatelegitimacy-issue
   Google Scholar
• Peter, F. (2017). Political legitimacy. In: The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/
   Google Scholar
• Popelier, P. (2018). Bicameralism in Belgium: The dismantlement of the Senate for the sake of multinational confederalism. Perspectives on Federalism, 10(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0024
   Google Scholar
• Roller, E. (2002). Reforming the Spanish senate: Mission impossible? Western European Politics, 25(4), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russ, S. (2010). Der französische Senat: Die Schildkröte der Republik. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 61–388). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2010). A stronger second chamber? Assessing the impact of House of Lords reform in 1999 and the lessons for bicameralism. Political Studies, 58(5), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2013a). Rethinking bicameral strength: A three-dimensional approach. Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(3), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.773639
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2013b). The contemporary House of Lords. Westminster bicameralism revisited. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1994). Comparative constitutional engineering. An inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmedes, H.-J. (2019). Der Bundesrat in der Parteiendemokratie. Aufgabe, Struktur und Wirkung der Länderkammer im föderalen Gefüge. Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P. (2014). Comparative overview of consultative practices within the second chambers of EU national legislatures. Committee of the Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Shair-Rosenfield, S., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Chapman-Osterkatz, S. (2021). Language difference and regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies, 31(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2020.1831476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell, D. (2007). The House of Lords. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, B. (1999). Coequal partner: The U.S. Senate. In S. C. Patterson, & A. Mughan (Eds.), Senates: Bicameralism in the contemporary world (pp. 32–58). Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2004). Deliberative politics in action: Analyzing parliamentary discourse. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tasker, J. P. (2017). Senate changes definition of a ‘caucus’, ending liberal, conservative duopoly. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-rules-caucus-change-1.4112744
   Google Scholar
• Träger, H. (2009). Der Senat der USA: Seit 220 Jahren unverändert einflussreich. In S. Leunig (Ed.), Handbuch föderale Zweite Kammern (pp. 258–275). Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uhr, J. (2009). Bicameralism. In S. A. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes, & B. A. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 474-494). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0024
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. (2005). Bicameralism and policy performance: The effects of cameral structure in comparative perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(2), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500158607
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. (2020). Das politische System der Schweiz (4th ed.). Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A., Freiburghaus, R., & Triaca, L. (2017). Deutsches Bundesrats- vs. Schweizer Senatsmodell im Lichte sich wandelnder Parteiensysteme: Repräsentation und Legitimität zweiter Kammern im Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 4(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-1758-2017-4-741
   Google Scholar
• Vercesi, M. (2017). What kind of veto player is the Italian Senate? A comparative analysis of European second chambers. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 22(5), 604–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2017.1389523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercesi, M. (2019). Democratic stress and political institutions: Drives of reforms of bicameralism in times of crisis. Representation, early view, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1635195
   Google Scholar
• Walkowiak, P. (2014). Sénat sert à quoi? RTBF. https://www.rtbf.be/info/dossier/chroniques/detail_senat-sert-a-quoi-philippewalkowiak?id=
   Google Scholar
• Walter, M. (2010). Politischer Tabakladen oder Rat der Weisen? Der tschechische Senat. In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 333–360). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2017). A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilp, M. (2012). Das politische System der Niederlande. VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. (1999). The New England town meeting: Democracy in action. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, W. (2010). Der belgische Senat – Institution unter Denkmalschutz? In G. Riescher, S. Russ, & C. M. Haas (Eds.), Zweite Kammern (pp. 211–243). Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar