Complex and nonlinear pedagogy and the implications for physical education

References

• Araújo, D. & Davids, K. (2011) What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(3–4), 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atencio, M., Jess, M. & Dewar, K. (2012) It is a case of changing your thought processes, the way you actually teach: implementing a complex professional learning agenda in Scottish Physical Education, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 127–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A. & Plucker, J. A. (2002) Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning, Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswik, E. (1956) Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments(2nd edn) (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. I., Storey, B. & Robson, C. (2012) Emergent learning focused teachers and their ecological complexity worldview, Sport, Education and Society. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.680435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Rein, R., Hristovski, R. & Koh, M. (2009) Dynamics of multi-articular coordination in neurobiological systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 13(1), 27–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I. & Araujo, D. (2007) The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education, Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D. & Passos, P. (2011) Nonlinear pedagogy: learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems, New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1997) Being there: putting brain, body and world together again (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1999) An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2001) Mindware. An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science (New York, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Davids, K., Button, C. & Bennett, S. J. (2008) Coordination and control of movement in sport: an ecological approach (Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. & Sumara, D. (2006) Complexity and education: inquires into learning, teaching and research (London, Lawrence Erlbaum).
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W. (2008) Complexity and the culture of curriculum, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 190–212.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, G., Wright, J. & Pearson, P. (2012) How do you do what you do? Examining the development of quality teaching in using GCA in PETE teachers, Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979) An ecological approach to visual perception (Boston, MA, Houghton- Mifflin).
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., Butler, J. & Storey, B. (2009) TGfU … simply good pedagogy: understanding a complex challenge (Ottawa, Physical Health Education Association (Canada)).
   Google Scholar
• Jess, M. (2012) The developmental physical education project: complex ecological innovation in action. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Jess, M., Atencio, M. & Carse, N. ( in press) Introducing conditions of complexity in the context of Scottish PE, in: A. Ovens, T. Hopper & J. Butler (Eds) Complexity in physical education: reframing curriculum, pedagogy and research (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Jess, M., Atencio, M. & Thorburn, M. (2011) Complexity theory: supporting curriculum and pedagogy developments in Scottish physical education, Sport, Education and Society, 16, 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffmann, S. A. (1995) At home in the universe: the search for laws of complexity (London, Viking).
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1947/1951) Field theory in social science (New York, Harper).
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2008) Complex learning theory: its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: implications for physical education, Journal of Teaching Physical Education, 27(1), 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., Harvey, S. & Mouchet, A. ( in press) Improving ‘at-action’ decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach, Sport, Education and Society. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.665803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaughtry, N. & Rovegno, I. (2001) Meaning and movement: exploring the deep connections to education, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20(6), 489–505.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Report. (2010) How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better (London, McKinsey and Company).
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, M. C., Fry, J. M., Wright, S. C., Tan, W. K. C., Tan, K. S. & Schempp, P. G. (2004) In the local context: Singaporean challenges to teaching games on practicum, Sport, Education and Society, 9(1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2006) Physical education syllabus (Singapore, Ministry of Education, Curriculum Planning and Development Division).
   Google Scholar
• MOE Corporate Brochure. (2010) Education in Singapore (Singapore, Ministry of Education).
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2008) Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory, Education Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, K. M. (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination, in: M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds) Motor development in children. Aspects of coordination and control (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff), 341–360.
   Google Scholar
• Port, R. F. & van Gelder, T. (1995) Mind as motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. & Hase, S. (2002) Complexity and action research: exploring the theoretical and methodological connection, Educational Action Research, 10(3), 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., Davids, K., Renshaw, I. & Portus, M. (2010) Expert performance in sport and the dynamics of talent development, Sports Medicine, 40(3), 1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K. & Hammond, J. (2010) A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: a basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 152, 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw, I., Davids, K., Phillips, E. & Kerherve, H. (2012) Developing talent in athletes as complex neurobiological systems, in: J. Baker, S. Cobley & J. Schorer (Eds) Talent identification and development in sport: international Perspectives (New York, Routledge), 64–80.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, T., Fry, J. M., McNeill, M. & Tan, C. W. K. (2007) The Games Concept Approach (GCA) as a mandated practice: views of Singaporean teachers, Sport, Education and Society, 12(1), 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. W. K., Chow, J. Y. & Davids, K. (2011) ‘How does TGfU work?’: examining the relationship between learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2011.582486
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1995) The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience (London, MIT Press).
   Google Scholar