20,653
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Learning through group work in physical education: a symbolic interactionist approach

, &

References

  • Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, M. O'Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.), Handbook of research in physical education (pp. 347–365.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Annerstedt, C. (2008). Physical education in Scandinavia with a focus on Sweden: A comparative perspective. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 303–318. doi:10.1080/17408980802353347
  • Azzarito, L., & Solmon, M. A. (2006). A post-structural analysis of high school students’ gendered and racialized body meanings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 75–98.
  • Barker, D. M., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2013). Inter-student interactions and student learning in health and physical education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. doi:10.1080/17408989.2013.868875
  • Casey, A., & Dyson, B. (2012). Cooperative learning in physical education. In B. Dyson & A. Casey (Eds.), Cooperative learning in physical education: A research-based approach (pp. 166–175). London: Routledge.
  • Darnis-Paraboschi, F., Lafont, L., & Menaut, A. (2005). A social-constructivist approach in physical education: Influence of dyadic interactions on tactical choices in an instructional team sport setting. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 171–184. doi:10.1007/BF03173506
  • Dyson, B. (2002). The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 69–85.
  • Enfield, N. J. (2011). Elements of formulation.In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 59–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ensergueix, P. J., & Lafont, L. (2010). Reciprocal peer tutoring in a physical education setting: Influence of peer tutor training and gender on motor performance and self-efficacy outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25, 222–242.doi: 10.1007/s10212-009-0010-0
  • Evans, J., Davies, B., & Rich, E. (2009). The body made flesh: Embodied learning and the corporeal device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30, 391–406. doi:10.1080/01425690902954588
  • Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
  • Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 53–73. doi:10.1177/0957926507069457
  • Goodwin, C. (2010). Constructing meaning through prosody in aphasia. In D. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in Interaction (pp. 373–394). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
  • Goodwin, M. H. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance status and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Goodyear, V. A., Casey, A., & Kirk, D. (2012). Hiding behind the camera: social learning within the Cooperative Learning Model to engage girls in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 712–734.
  • Hennings, J., Wallhead, T., & Byra, M. (2010). A didactic analysis of student content learning during the reciprocal style of teaching, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 227–244.
  • Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2007). Understanding learning cultures. Educational Review, 59(4), 415–427.
  • Hutchins, E., & Nomura, S. (2011). Collaborative constructions of multimodal utterances. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 29–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Keevallik, L. (2010). Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 401–426. doi:10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
  • Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. London: Routledge.
  • Kirk, D., & Kinchin, G. (2003). Situated learning as a theoretical framework for sport education. European Physical Education Review, 9, 221–235.doi: 10.1177/1356336X030093002
  • Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Re-thinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192.
  • Lafont, L. (2012). Cooperative learning and tutoring in sports and physical activities. In B. Dyson & A. Casey (Eds.), Cooperative learning in physical education: A research based approach (pp. 136–149). London: Routledge.
  • Lafont, L., Proeres, M., & Vallet, C. (2007). Cooperative group learning in a team game: Role of verbal exchanges among peers. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 93–113. doi:10.1007/s11218-006-9006-7
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the perspective of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Melander, H. (2012). Transformations of knowledge within a peer group: Knowing and learning in interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 232–248. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.09.003
  • Melander, H. (2013). Att lära av varandra: Om social mediering i en elevgrupp [To learn from each other: About social mediation in a group of pupils]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 18, 62–86.
  • Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
  • Quennerstedt, M., Annerstedt, C., Barker, D., Karlefors, I., Larsson, H., Redelius, K., & Öhman, M. (2014). What did they learn in school today? A method for exploring aspects of learning in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20, 282–302. doi:10.1177/1356336X14524864
  • Quennerstedt, M., Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2011). Investigating learning in physical education—a transactional approach. Sport, Education and Society, 16, 159–177.
  • Siedentop, D., Hastie, P., & van der Mars, H. (2011). Complete guide to sport education (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 1–28) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wallhead, T., & O'Sullivan, M. (2005). Sport education: Physical education for the new millennium. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 10, 181–210. doi:10.1080/17408980500105098
  • Wallhead, T., & O'Sullivan, M. (2007). A didactic analysis of content development during the peer teaching tasks of a sport education season. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12, 225–243. doi:10.1080/17408980701610177
  • Ward, P., & Lee, M. (2005). Peer-assisted learning in physical education: A review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 205–225.
  • Ward, G., & Quennerstedt, M. (2015). Knowing in primary physical education in the UK: Negotiating movement culture. Sport, Education and Society, 20, 588–603. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.975114