What were you thinking? A methodological approach for exploring decision-making and learning in physical education

References

• Amade-Escot, C. (2005). Using the critical didactic incidents method to analyze the content taught. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(2), 127–148. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.24.2.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, D. MacDonald & M. O'Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 347–385). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Amade-Escot, C., & O'Sullivan, M. (2007). Research on content in physical education: Theoretical perspectives and current debates. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 185–204. doi: 10.1080/17408980701610144
   Google Scholar
• Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2015). Learning through group work in physical education: A symbolic interactionist approach. Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 604–623. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.962493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D., Wallhead, T., Brock, S., Goodyear, V., & Amade-Escot, C. (2017). Group work in physical education: Exploring the interconnectedness of theoretical approaches and practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(1), 50–60. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2016-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., & Burbules, N. C. (2003). From experience to knowledge. In Pragmatism and educational research (pp. 25–53). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker, R., & Macdonald, D. (1999). Did we hear you ?: Issues of student voice in a curriculum innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 83–97. doi: 10.1080/002202799183313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. I. (2006). Curriculum constructions of ability: Enhancing learning through teaching games for understanding (TGfU) as a curriculum model. Sport, Education and Society, 11(3), 243–258. doi: 10.1080/13573320600813408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamont, S. (2004). Ethnography and participant observation. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 217–229). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 349–367. doi: 10.1007/s11133-010-9157-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. doi: 10.1080/10508400903452884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalt, K. M., & DeWalt, B. R. (2011). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). Plymouth: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review, 3(4), 357–370. doi: 10.1037/h0070405
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910/1997). How we think. New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works 1899–1924 (Vol. 9, pp. 4–371). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922/1983). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works 1899–1924 (Vol. 14, pp. 3–254). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience and education. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dürr, K. (2005). The All-European study on pupil participation-the school: A democratic learning community. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, E., & O'Sullivan, M. (2010). ‘Can I do it in my pyjamas?’ negotiating a physical education curriculum with teenage girls. European Physical Education Review, 16(3), 203–222. doi: 10.1177/1356336X10382967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fesmire, S. (2014). Dewey. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015). “I’ma facilitator of learning!” understanding what teachers and students do within student-centered physical education models. Quest (grand Rapids, Mich ), 67(3), 274–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278–300. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2012.754005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, D., & Tannehill, D. (2014). “Crazy ideas”: Student involvement in negotiating and implementing the physical education curriculum in the Irish senior cycle. Physical Educator, 71(3), 391–416.
   Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, T., & Watt, A. (2011). Finnish physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth’s teaching styles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 248–262. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.30.3.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R. L., Harvey, S., & Mouchet, A. (2014). Improving ‘at-action’decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach. Sport, Education and Society, 19(3), 258–275. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.665803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhail, A., Kirk, D., & Griffin, L. (2008). Throwing and catching as relational skills in game play: Situated learning in a modified game unit. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27(1), 100–115. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.27.1.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (2015). Games centered approaches in teaching children & adolescents: Systematic review of associated student outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 34(1), 36–58. doi: 10.1123/jtpe.2013-0155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, F., Gray, S., & Inchley, J. (2015). ‘This choice thing really works … ’ changes in experiences and engagement of adolescent girls in physical education classes, during a school-based physical activity programme. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(6), 593–611. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2013.837433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
   Google Scholar
• Quennerstedt, M., Annerstedt, C., Barker, D., Karlefors, I., Larsson, H., Redelius, K., & Öhman, M. (2014). What did they learn in school today? A method for exploring aspects of learning in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(2), 282–302. doi: 10.1177/1356336X14524864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw, I., Chow, Y., Davids, K. W., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117–137. doi: 10.1080/17408980902791586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Green, K., & Thurston, M. (2009). ‘Activity choice’ and physical education in England and Wales. Sport, Education and Society, 14(2), 203–222. doi: 10.1080/13573320902809096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. (2016). Fundamental movement skills and fundamental games skills are complementary pairs and should be taught in complementary ways at all stages of skill development. Sport, Education and Society, 21(3), 431–442. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.927757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderstraeten, R. (2002). Dewey’s transactional constructivism. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(2), 233–246. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.00272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar