The campus and the city: a design revolution explained

References

• A&U. 2005. “Special Issue: New University Environments.” (A&U, Tokyo, February) 413: 7–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, T. 1988. The University and the City, from Mediaeval Origins to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., and G.-J. Hospers. 2007. Urban Competitiveness in the Knowledge Economy: Universities as New Planning Animators. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Birks, T. 1972. Building the New Universities. Newton Abbott: David & Charles.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, A. 2004. “David Neuman: Planning Utopias Where Campus Is King.” Architectural Record 192 (1): 208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., S. Tiesdell, T. Heath, and O. Taner. 2010. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Corneil, J., and P. Parsons. 2007. “The Contribution of Campus Design to the Knowledge Society: An International Perspective.” In Campus and the City - Urban Design for the Knowledge Society, edited by K. Hoeger and K. Christiaanse, 114–127. Zurich: GTA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, J., P. Roberts, and I. Taylor. 2015a. University Trends - Contemporary Campus Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, J., P. Roberts, and I. Taylor. 2015b. University Planning and Architecture: The Search for Perfection. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, J., P. Roberts, and I. Taylor. 2015c. “The Future of the Campus - Architecture and Master Planning Trends.” Perspectives - Policy & Practice in Higher Education 19 (4): 116–121. doi:10.1080/13603108.2015.1026421.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, P. 1974. The University in an Urban Environment: A Study of Activity Patterns from a Planning Viewpoint. Sponsored by the Centre of Environmental Studies. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, R. 1995. LSE: A History of the London School of Economics and Political Science 1895–1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diderot. 2018. “L’université Au Coeur De La Société.” Accessed August 22, 2018. https://universite.univ-paris-diderot.fr/
   Google Scholar
• Dober, R. P. 1992. Campus Design. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2000. University Architecture. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Esher, L. B., Viscount. 1968. York - A Study in Conservation [Report of the Ministry of Housing & Local Government and York City Council]. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Farrells. 2004. “Manchester University Masterplan [For Project Unity Merger of UMIST and the Victoria University of Manchester].” Accessed April 11, 2018. https://farrells.com/project/manchester-university-masterplan
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2006. “Regions and Universities Together Can Foster a Creative Economy.” Chronicle of Higher Education 53 (4): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Debra. 2009. “An Extraordinary Partnership between Arizona State University and The City of Phoenix.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 13 (3): 89–100.
   Google Scholar
• Genestier, P. 1991. “L’Université Et La Cité.” In L’Habitat Des Étudiants En France, edited by P. Merlin, 1–45. Marne-la-Vallée: Laboratoire Théories des Mutations Urbaines.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, H. 2009. “Die Universität Dortmund Und Ihre Geplante Integration in Die Stadt.” (= 40 Jahre Universität Dortmund) Heimat Dortmund, no. 1: 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• GLC. 1970. Greater London Development Plan Report of Studies. London: Greater London Council.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, J., and P. Vallance. 2013. The University and the City. London: Routledge for Regional Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hajrasouliha, A. H. 2017. “Master-Planning the American Campus: Goals, Actions and Design Strategies.” Urban Design International 22 (4): 363–381. doi:10.1057/s41289-017-0044-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1997. “The University and the City.” Geojournal 41 (4): 301–309. doi:10.1023/A:1006806727397.
   Google Scholar
• Hebbert, M. 2017. “Figure-Ground, History and Practice of a Planning Technique.” Town Planning Review 87: 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hnilica, S., and M. Jager. 2015. “Die Universitäten Im Ruhrgebiet.” In Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Architekturvision der Nachkriegsmoderne, edited by C. Jöchner, R. Hoppe-Sailer & F. Schmitz, 90–110, Berlin: Reimer.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeger, K., and K. Christiaanse, eds. 2007. Campus and the City - Urban Design for the Knowledge Society. Zurich: GTA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. 2009. “From the Confinement of Heterotopia to the Urbanity of Novartis Ville.” In Novartis International AG Novartis Campus, edited by R. Boutellier, 257–265. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T. 2016. “Context.” In Future Campus: Design Quality in University Buildings, edited by I. Taylor, 4–5. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marmot, A. 2014. “Managing the Campus.” In The Physical University: Contours of Space and Place in Higher Education, edited by P. Temple, 58–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster. 2008. “McMaster University Campus Master Plan.” Accessed February 21, 2018. www.mcmaster.ca/policy/Governance/Other/Campus_Master_%20Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Merlin, P. 1995. L’Urbanisme Universitaire À L’étranger Et En France. Paris: Presses de l’école Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées.
   Google Scholar
• MIT. 2010. “MIT2030: The Framework Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Department of Facilities.” Accessed February 21, 2018. www.mit.edu/mit2030
   Google Scholar
• MIT. 2017. “MIT’s One Broadway Building to Be the Future Home of Brothers Marketplace: Announcement Delivers on a Key Commitment by the Institute to the Cambridge Community.” MIT News Office. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://news.mit.edu/2017/mit-one-broadway-building-brothers-marketplace-1214
   Google Scholar
• Muthesius, S. 2001. The Postwar University: Utopianist Campus and College. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1998. Towards the 21st Century: Facilities for Tertiary Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Ossa-Richardson, A. 2014. “The Idea of a University and Its Concrete Form.” In The Physical University: Contours of Space and Place in Higher Education, edited by P. Temple, 159–181. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, D. C., and W. Wiewel, eds. 2005. The University as Urban Developer: Case Studies and Analysis. Washington DC: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix. 2004. Downtown Phoenix, a Strategic Vision and Blueprint for the Future. Phoenix Arizona: City of Phoenix. Accessed May 21, 2018 www.phoenix.gov/econdevsite/Documents/2004_Downtown_Strategic_Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Polyzoides, S. 2000. “Success and Failure in Campus Design in the Post-World War II Era.” In Designing the Campus of Tomorrow: The Legacy of the Hearst Architectural Plan, Present and Future, edited by B. A. Museum. Symposium February 10th 2000. Accessed December 10, 2015 http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/uchistory/archives
   Google Scholar
• Puckett, J. L., and M. F. Lloyd. 2015. Becoming Penn: The Pragmatic American University 1950–2000. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saffron, I. 2015. “Changing Skyline: The Ugly Story behind Penn’s Bucolic Urban Campus.” Philadelphia Inquirer November 27.
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki Associates. 2011. “University of Texas at Austin Master Plan.” Accessed February 22, 2018. http://www.sasaki.com/project/317/University-of-Texas-at-Austin-Master-Plan/
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki Associates. 2016. “Tecnológico De Monterrey Urban Regeneration Plan.” Accessed February 21, 2018. http://www.sasaki.com/project/345/tecnolgico-de-monterrey-urban-regeneration-plan/
   Google Scholar
• Sasaki Associates. 2018. “University of Pennsylvania Penn Connects.” Accessed June 17, 2018. http://www.sasaki.com/project/116/university-of-pennsylvania-penn-connects/
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2013. Charter for the New Urbanism. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I., ed. 2016. Future Campus: Design Quality in University Buildings. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E.P. 1970. Warwick University Ltd. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education Special.
   Google Scholar
• Trancik, R. 1986. Finding Lost Space - Theories of Urban Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, P. V. 1984. Campus: An American Planning Tradition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• UrbanStrategies. 1994. “University of Minnesota Master Plan.” Accessed February 21, 2018. http://www.urbanstrategies.com/project/university-of-minnesota-master-plan/
   Google Scholar
• USD. 2017. “University of San Diego Master Plan Update. [M.W. Steele Group Inc. for submission to City Council, July 18 2017].” Accessed April 11, 2018. http://www.catcher.sandiego.edu/items/usd/USD%20MasterPlan.pdf//.
   Google Scholar
• VSBA. 2002. “University of Michigan Master Plan.” Venturi, Scott Brown & Associates Inc for University of Michigan. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://www.vsba.com/projects/university-of-michigan-campus-master-plan/
   Google Scholar
• W&W. 1967. Manchester Education Precinct - Final Report of the Planning Consultants. Manchester: Corporation of Manchester for Hugh Wilson & Lewis Womersely
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, R. 2003. “Dreaming the New Atlantis: Science and the Planning of Technopolis 1955-1985.” Osiris 18 (1): 269. doi:10.1086/649387.
   Google Scholar
• Yale University. 2000. A Framework for Campus Planning. New Haven: Yale University.
   Google Scholar