Helping Birmingham Families Early: The “Signs of Safety and Well-being” Practice Framework

References

• Birmingham Safeguarding Children Board. (2016). Right service right time. Retrieved August 1, 2016, from http://www.lscbbirmingham.org.uk/index.php/delivering-effective-support
   Google Scholar
• Bricker-Jenkins, M. (1997). Hidden treasures: Unlocking strengths in the public social services. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (2nd ed., pp. 133–150). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, A. (2013). Signs of safety in England: An NSPCC commissioned report on the signs of safety model in child protection. London: NSPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P. (2014). Child poverty: The role of children’s services. Dartington: Research in Practice.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, M., & Hackett, S. (Eds.). (2003). Assessment in childcare: Using and developing frameworks for practice. Dorset: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, M. (2007). Practice frameworks: Conceptual maps to guide interventions in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 37(5), 825–837. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, M., & Healy, K. (2007). Social work practice theories and frameworks. In M. Connolly & L. Harms (Eds.), Social work: Contexts and practice ( Chapter 2, 2nd edn., pp. 19–36). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, K. (2015). Social work with troubled families: A critical introduction (Ed. K. Davies). London: Jessica Kingslea Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Early, T. J. (2001). Measures for practice with families from a strengths perspective. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82(2), 225–232. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol, CT: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., & Trowler, I. (2012). Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice. London: Jessica Kingslea Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Graybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82(3), 233–242. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, S. (1998). The thin book of appreciative inquiry (2nd ed.). Bend, OR: Thin Book Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K. (2005). Social work theories in context creating frameworks for practice. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, R. (2005). Strengths-based practice in statutory care and protection work. In M. Nash, R. Munford, & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Social work theories in action (pp. 174–188). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. (2013). Community capital and the role of the state: An empowering approach to personalisation. People, Place and Policy Online, 7(3), 153–167. doi: 10.3351/ppp.0007.0003.0004
   Google Scholar
• Keddell, E., & Stanley, T. (2015). Moving from risk to safety: Work with children and families in child welfare. In Kate van Heugten & Anita Gibbs (Eds.), Social work for sociologists (pp. 67–83). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lonne, B., Parton, N., Thomson, J., & Harries, M. (2009). Reforming child protection. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, K. (2013). Troubled families: Vulnerable families’ experiences of multiple service use. Child and Family Social Work, 18, 198–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2016). Monitoring visit of LA children services. Retrieved August 20, 2016, from https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/local-authorities/birmingham
   Google Scholar
• Pack, M. (2013). Building safe communities: Teaching social work students about the importance of comprehensive strengths-based approaches of offender rehabilitation. Practice, 25(4), 221–231. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2013.829438
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2016). An authoritarian approach to child welfare and protection? Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(2), 7–8. doi: 10.11157/anzswj-vol28iss2id219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41(3), 296–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleebey, D. (2010). The strengths perspective in social work practice. Kansas City: Strengths Institute, University of Kansas, School of Social Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, J. (2008). Systems thinking in the public sector. Amminster: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, R., & Gibson, M. (2016). Less than human: A qualitative study into the experience of parents involved in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. (2013). ‘Our tariff will rise’: Risk probabilities and child protection. Health Risk and Society, 15(1), 67–83. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2012.753416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. (2016). A practice framework to support the care act 2014. The Journal of Adult Protection, 18(1), 53–64. doi: 10.1108/JAP-07-2015-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, T., & Mills, R. (2014). “Signs of safety” practice at the health and children’s social care interface. Practice, 26(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2013.867942
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Thoburn, J. (2016). Collaborative practice with vulnerable children and their families. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Mann, R. (2004). Good lives and rehabilitation of Sex offenders: A positive approach to treatment. In A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 598–616). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar