Domain-specific Consideration of Future Consequences: Further Evidence Using Academic Attainment Data

References

• Adams, J., & Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass and physical activity: An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 83–105. doi: 10.1348/135910708X299664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. C., Andretta, J. R., & McKay, M. T. (2016). The relationship between temporal profiles and alcohol-related problems in University Undergraduates: Results from the United Kingdom. Addictive Behaviors, 55, 15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassen, F. C. M., Houben, K., & Jansen, A. (2015). Time orientation and eating behavior: Unhealthy eaters consider immediate consequences, while healthy eaters focus on future health. Appetite, 91, 13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332–344. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr, N., Krueckeberg, S., Strathman, A., & Wood, M. D. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of voluntary HIV antibody testing in college students. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11, 14–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology – Research and Practice, 40, 532–538. doi: 10.1037/a0015808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau, R., Salanova, M., & Peiro, J. M. (2001). Moderator effects of self-efficacy on occupational stress. Psychology in Spain, 5, 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer, T. (2013). Beware of climate change skeptic films. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 105–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel, C. (2009). Academic self-efficacy in ALL: Capacity-building through self-belief. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3, A94–A104.
   Google Scholar
• Joireman, J., & King, S. (2016). Individual differences in the consideration of future and (more) immediate consequences: A review and directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 313–326. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennings, C. J., Burns, A. M., & Cooney, G. (1998). Profiles of time perspective and personality: Developmental considerations. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 629–641. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, B., Li, X., Jiang, Z., & Jiang, J. (2019). Recycle more, waste more? When recycling efforts increase resource consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 870–877. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. T., Morgan, G. B., Wells, K. E., Worrell, F. C., Cole, J. C., & Andretta, J. R. (2019). The influence of time attitudes on adolescent alcohol use behaviours: A 33-month prospective study in the United Kingdom. Addiction Research and Theory, 27, 189–197.  doi: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1478414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., & Cole, J. C. (2018). Further evidence for the domain specificity of consideration of future consequences in adolescents and university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., Cole, J. C., & Magee, J. (2017). Adolescents consider the future differently depending on the domain in question: Results of an exploratory study in the United Kingdom. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 448–452. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M.T., Perry, J. L., Cole, J. C., & Worrell, F. C. (2018). What time is it? Temporal psychology measures relate differently to alcohol-related health outcomes. Addiction Research and Theory, 26, 20–27. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2017.1309032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2006). The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 271–289. doi: 10.1177/016235320602900302
   Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. K. C. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 325–334. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muris, P. (2001). A brief questionnaire for measuring self-efficacy in youths. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 145–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1010961119608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., & Dockray, S. (2018). The consideration of future consequences and health behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 12, 357–381. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1489298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, L., & Murphy, G. (2018). Time to drive: Present vs. Future orientation and self-reported driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 56, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017). Educational opportunity for all: Overcoming inequality throughout the life course. Paris, France: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264287457-en.
   Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Health Psychology, 23, 388–396. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Dempster, M., & McKay, M. T. (2017). Academic self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between Scottish index of multiple deprivation and composite attainment score. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1899. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2013). Scottish Survey of Literacy and Numeracy 2012. www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2013/04/8843/0
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2015). The Scottish attainment challenge. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2016a). Introducing the Scottish Index of multiple deprivation 2016. Edinburgh, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2016b). 2017 national improvement framework and implementation plan for Scottish education: Achieving excellence and equality. Edinburgh: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2016c). Scottish index of multiple deprivation. Edinburgh: Author. https://data.gov.uk/dataset/a448dd2a-9197-4ea0-8357-c2c9b3c29591/scottish-index-of-multiple-deprivation-simd-2016
   Google Scholar
• Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective in achievement and studying. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481–506. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 121–139. doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000026609.94841.2f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosu, E., & Ellis, S. (2014). Closing the attainment gap in Scottish education. London, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumnall, H., Agus, A., Cole, J., Doherty, P., Foxcroft, D., Harvey, S., … Percy, A. (2017). Steps towards alcohol misuse prevention programme (STAMPP): A school- and community-based cluster randomised controlled trial. Public Health Research, 5, 02. doi: 10.3310/phr05020
   Google Scholar
• Worrell, F. C., McKay, M. T., & Andretta, J. R. (2018). Psychometric properties of Adolescent Time Inventory Time Attitude (ATI-TA) scores in three waves of longitudinal data. Psychological Assessment, 30, 106–115.  doi: 10.1037/pas0000457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrell, F. C., Mello, Z. R., & Buhl, M. (2013). Introducing English and German versions of the adolescent time attitude scale (ATAS). Assessment, 20, 496–510. doi: 10.1177/1073191110396202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Time perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar