A Sad Story? Time, Interpretation and Feeling in Biographical Methods

References

• Bereswill, M., Morgenroth, C., & Redman, P. (2010). Alfred Lorenzer and the depth-hermeneutic method. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15(3), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2010.12
   Google Scholar
• Berriman, L., & Thomson, R. (2015). Spectacles of intimacy? Mapping the moral landscape of teenage social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(5), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.992323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman, L. (2019). Haunted data: Affect, transmedia, weird science. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bornat, J. (2010). Remembering and reworking emotions: The reanalysis of emotions in an interview. Oral History, 38, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2006). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Caetano, A. (2015). Personal reflexivity and biography: Methodological challenges and strategies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.885154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (2012). Modern motherhood: Women and family in England, 1945-2000. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois-Reymond, M. (1998). ‘I don’t want to commit myself yet’: Young people’s life concepts. Journal of Youth Studies, 1(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.1998.10592995
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L., & Sotirin, P. (2020). Making data in qualitative research: Engagements, ethics and entanglements. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, H. (2011). Interviewing mothers: Reflections on closeness and reflexivity in research encounter. Studies in the Maternal, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.16995/sim.71
   Google Scholar
• Froggett, L., & Wengraf, T. (2004). Interpreting interviews in the light of research team dynamics: A study of Nila’s biographic interview. Critical Psychology, 10, 94–122.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S. (2013). Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and ghostly transmissions. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S., & Baraitser, L. (2008). Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 13(4), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2008.8
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V. S., & Edwards, R. (2012). Working with archived classic family and community studies: Illuminating past and present conventions around acceptable research practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.688323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. (2016). Sociology’s fate: Intersections of history and (My) biography. Sociology, 50(5), 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516650604
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., & Parsons, L. (2020). Locating the auto/biographical: Sociological exchanges through walking with Nelson Sullivan. School of Media, Commutation and Sociology: Occasional Paper. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.31346.73928
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, T. (2018). Emotion and narrative: Perspectives in autobiographical storytelling. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C., & Pick, D. (2017). Thinking about denial. History Workshop Journal, 84, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbx040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, S. (2019). Wayward lives, beautiful experiments. Serpents Tail.
   Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., & Froggett, L. (2012). Researching in between subjective experience and reality. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203132
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, P., & Zmroczek, C. (1997). Class matters: Working class women’s perspectives on social class. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2014). ‘It’s just drama’: Teen perspectives on conflict and aggression in a networked era. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(9), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.901493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., & Wright, K. (2009). The talking cure in everyday life: Gender, generations and friendship. Sociology, 43(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508099101
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (2007). Top girls? Cultural Studies, 21(4-5), 718–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380701279044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, N. (2007). (Re)using qualitative data? Sociological Research Online, 12(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, N., Dunne, N., Hanlan, M., & Karels, M. (2021). Towards an inventive ethics of care-full risk: Unsettling research through DIY academic archiving. Australian Feminist Studies, 36(108), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2021.2018991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenroth, C. (2010). The research relationship, enactments and ‘counter-transference’ analysis: On the significance of scenic understanding. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 15(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1057/pcs.2010.11
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. B. (2018). Feeling gender: A generational & psychosocial approach. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (2004) The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 167–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00156.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps, A. (2019). The fight against sexual violence. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 71, 62–74. https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.71.05.2019
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, A., Brannen, J., Elliott, H., Smithson, J., Morris, P., Smart, C., Barlow, A., & Bauer, E. (2016). Group analysis in practice: Narrative approaches. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2), 9. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2391/3978
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, K. (1994). Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravn, S. (2021). Reframing immobility: Young women aspiring to ‘good enough’ local futures. Journal of Youth Studies, online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1948515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reissman, C. (1987). When gender is not enough: Women interviewing women. Gender & Society, 1(2), 172–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riceour, P. (1979). The human experience of time and narrative. Research in Phenomenology, 9, 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed, pp. 923–948). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, M. (2005). Slipping out of view: Subjectivity and emotion in gender history. History Workshop Journal, 59(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbi006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S., & Dashper, K. (2016). Sociology in the 1980s: The rise of gender (and intersectionality). Sociology, 50(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515620359
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, K., Krüger, S., & Rosengart, D. (2022). Cultural analysis now! Alfred Lorenzer and the in-depth hermeneutics of culture and society. Unconscious in Translation.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. (2010). Identities and social change in Britain since 1940: The politics of method. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2012). The incommensurability of psychoanalysis and history. History and Theory, 51(91), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00612.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanley, L. (1995). The auto/biograophical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biographical research. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, C. (2000). Enforced narratives: Stories of another self. In T. Cosslett, C. Lury, & P. Summerfield (Eds.), Feminism and autobiography: Texts, theories, methods. Transformations (pp. 25–39). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steedman, C. (2001). Dust. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (2022). What do we mean by reanimating: locating the methodology. Reanimating Data blog. http://reanimatingdata.co.uk/uncategorized/what-do-we-mean-by-reanimating-locating-the-methodology/
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., & Baraitser, L. (2018). Thinking through childhood and maternal studies: A feminist encounter. In R. Rosen & K. Twamley (Eds.), Feminism and the politics of childhood: Friends of foes? (pp. 66–82). University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Kehily, M. J., Hadfield, L., & Sharpe, S. (2011). Making modern mothers. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Moe, A., Thorne, B., & Nielsen, H. (2012). Situated affect in travelling data: Tracing meaning-making in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(4), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411434283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urwin, C., & Sternberg, J. (Eds.). (2011). Infant observation and research: Emotional processes in everyday lives. Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Urwin, C., & Sternberg, J. (2012). Infant observation and research: Emotional processes in everyday lives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. (1990). Didn’t she do well: A film. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hshXr61ydPU
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psycho-social explorations of gender and class. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., Olsvold, A., & Rudberg, M. (2013). Researching embodiment and intergenerational trauma using the work of Davoine and Gaudilliere: History walked in the door. Subjectivity, 6(3), 272–297. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.8
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. (2007). The world we have won: The remaking of erotic and intimate life. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., Reay, D., Morrin, K., & Abrahams, J. (2021). ‘The still-moving position’ of the ‘working-class’ feminist academic: Dealing with disloyalty, dislocation and discomfort. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1767936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar