Publication Cover
Mortality
Promoting the interdisciplinary study of death and dying
Volume 22, 2017 - Issue 1
1,579
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Constructing physician-assisted dying: the politics of evidence from permissive jurisdictions in Carter v. Canada

, , &

References

  • Beckett, K., & Hoffman, B. (2005). Challenging medicine: Law, resistance, and the cultural politics of childbirth. Law & Society Review, 39, 125–169.
  • Carter v. Canada (Attorney General). (2012). BCSC 886, 287 C.C.C. (3d) 1, (BCSC).
  • Carter v. Canada (Attorney General). (2015). SCC 5, 468 N.R. 1, (Can.).
  • Cherny, N. I. (1996). The problem of inadequately relieved suffering. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 13–30.10.1111/josi.1996.52.issue-2
  • Cole, S. A. (1998). Witnessing identification latent fingerprinting evidence and expert knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 28, 687–712.10.1177/030631298028005002
  • Cole, S. A. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Thinking about expert evidence as expert testimony. Villanova Law Review, 52, 803–842.
  • Collins, H. M. (1983). An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. J. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed : perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 85–114). London: Sage.
  • Deflem, M. (2008). Law and culture: The balance of values through norms Sociology of law : Visions of a scholarly tradition. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 198–224. 10.1017/CBO9780511815546
  • Dowbiggin, I. R. (2003). A merciful end: The Euthanasia movement in modern America, Oxford England. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Emanuel, E. J. (1994). Euthanasia: Historical, ethical, and empiric perspectives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154, 1890–1901.10.1001/archinte.1994.00420170022003
  • Flemming, R. (2005). Suicide, euthanasia and medicine: Reflections ancient and modern. Economy and Society, 34, 295–321.10.1080/03085140500054685
  • Fleming v. Ireland. (2013). IESC 19 (BAILII).
  • Griffiths, J., Weyers, H., & Adams, M. (2008). Euthanasia and law in Europe. Oxford: Hart.
  • Hacking, I. (2008). The suicide weapon. Critical Inquiry, 35, 1–32.10.1086/595626
  • Jackson, P. T. (2014). Making sense of making sense. Configurational analysis and the double hermeneutic. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 267–283). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.
  • Johnston, J. (2015). New Zealand case and New York Times magazine article draw attention to physician aid in dying. The Hastings Center. Bioethics Forum.
  • Latour, B. (2010). The making of law: An ethnography of the conseil D’Etat. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  • Lavi, S. J. (2007). The modern art of dying: A history of euthanasia in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Woodstock, Princeton University Press.
  • Livne, R. (2014). Economies of dying: The moralization of economic scarcity in U.S. hospice care. American Sociological Review, 79, 888–911.10.1177/0003122414547756
  • Lynch, M. (1998). The discursive production of uncertainty: The OJ Simpson ‘dream team’ and the sociology of knowledge machine. Social Studies of Science, 28, 829–868.10.1177/030631298028005007
  • Marvasti, A. B. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology: An introduction. London: SAGE.
  • Mather, L. (1998). Theorizing about trial courts: Lawyers, policymaking, and tobacco litigation. Law and Social Inquiry-Journal of the American Bar Foundation, 23, 897–940.10.1111/lsi.1998.23.issue-4
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Oregon Health Authority. (2006). Death with dignity act requirements. Retrieved June 11, 2015, from https://public.health.oregon.gov/ProviderPartnerResources/EvaluationResearch/DeathwithDignityAct/Documents/requirements.pdf
  • Pfohl, S. (2008). The reality of social constructions. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 645–668). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446222119
  • Scheffer, T. (2007). Statements, cases, and criminal cases. The Ethnographic Discourse Analysis of Legal Discourse Formations. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research, 8(2), 1–7.
  • Seale, C. (1998). Constructing death: The sociology of dying and bereavement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583421
  • Seymour, J. E. (2007). Windows on suffering: Sociological perspectives on end of life. Medical Sociology Online, 2, 35–50.
  • Tierney, T. F. (2010). The governmentality of suicide: Peuchet, Marx, Durkheim, and Foucault. Journal of Classical Sociology, 10, 357–389.10.1177/1468795X10379677
  • Timmermans, S. (2005). Death brokering: Constructing culturally appropriate deaths. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27, 993–1013.
  • Van Hooff, A. J. (2004). Ancient euthanasia:‘Good death’and the doctor in the graeco-Roman world. Social science & medicine, 58, 975–985.
  • Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 258–273.10.1177/0963662509102694
  • Walker, G. C. (2003). Medical euthanasia. In C. D. Bryant (Ed.), Handbook of death & dying (pp. 405–423). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Walter, T. (1994). The revival of death. London: Routledge.
  • Wolf, S. M. (1997) Pragamatism in the face of death: The role of facts in the assisted suicide debate. Minnesota Law Review, 82, 1063–1101.
  • Wright, D. K., Fishman, J. R., Karsoho, H., Sandham, S., & Macdonald, M. E. (2015). Physicians and euthanasia: a Canadian print-media discourse analysis of physician perspectives. CMAJ Open, 3, E134–E139.
  • Youk, T. (2004). Pioneers of hospice: Changing the face of dying. 49 min.: Fanlight Productions.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.