References
- Austin, L., & McGuinness, S. (2019). Reproductive loss and disposal of pregnancy remains. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 70(1), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2018.26.5.309>
- Bevir, M. (2011). Governance as theory, practice, and dilemma. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 1–16). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Beynon-Jones, S. M. (2012). Timing is everything: The demarcation of ‘later’ abortions in Scotland. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711426596
- Casper, M. (1994). Reframing and grounding nonhuman agency: What makes a fetus an agent? The American Behavioral Scientist, 37(6), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294037006009
- Charrier, P., & Clavandier, G. (2019). Ephemeral materiality: A place for lifeless infants in cemeteries. Mortality, 24(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2019.1585785
- Conway, H. (2016). The law and the dead. Routledge.
- Dinenage, C. (2016). Written statement to parliament: Infant cremations. UK Parliament: UK Government Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/infant-cremations.
- Duden, B. (1993). Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. L. Hoinacki, Trans. Harvard University Press.
- Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis. Routledge.
- Foster, C., & Herring, J. (2017). Identity, personhood and the law. Springer.
- Foster, L., Woodthorpe, K., & Walker, A. (2017). From cradle to grave? Policy responses to death in the UK. Mortality, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2017.1414776
- Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. A. Sheridan, Trans. Penguin Books.
- Franklin, S. (1991). Fetal fascinations: New dimensions of the medical-scientific construction of fetal personhood. In S. Franklin, C. Lury, & J. Stacey (Eds.), Off-centre: Feminism and cultural studies (pp. 190–205). HarperCollins Academic.
- Franklin, S. (1999). Making representations: The parliamentary debate on the human fertilisation and embyology act. In J. Edwards, S. Franklin, E. Hirsch, F. Price, & M. Strathern (Eds.), Technologies of procreation: Kinship in the age of assisted conception (2nd ed.) (pp. 127–165). Routledge.
- Government, U. K. (ND). Get help with funeral costs (Funeral Expenses Payment). https://www.gov.uk/funeral-payments/eligibility
- Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography:. Principles in practice: Routledge Ltd - M.U.A.
- Han, S. (2009). Seeing like a family: Fetal ultrasound images and imaginings of kin. In V. R. Sasson & J. M. Law (Eds.), Imagining the fetus: The unborn in myth, religion, and culture (pp. 275–290). Oxford University Press.
- Hanna, E., & Robert, G. (2019). Ethics of limb disposal: Dignity and the medical waste stockpiling scandal. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(9), 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105554
- Herring, J. (2011). The loneliness of status: The legal and moral significance of birth. In F. Ebtehaj, H. Jonathan, M. H. Johnson, & M. Richards (Eds.), Birth rites and rights (pp. 97–112. Hart Publishing.
- Hockey, J. (2002). Interviews as ethnography? Disembodied social interaction in Britain. In N. Rapport (Ed.), British subjects: An anthropology of Britain (pp. 209–222). New York Berg.
- Hockey, J., & Forsey, M. (2013). Ethnography is not participant observation: Reflections on the interview as participatory qualitative research. In J. Skinner (Ed.), The interview: An ethnographic approach (pp. 69–87). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
- House of Commons. (2018). Infant cremation. (Briefing Paper Number 07731). London.
- Howes-Mischel, R. (2017). The “sound” of life, or, how should we hear a fetal “voice”? In S. Han, T. K. Betsinger, & A. Scott (Eds.), Anthropology of the fetus: Biology, culture, and society (pp. 252–275). Berghahn Books.
- HTA. (2015). Guidance on the disposal of pregnancy remains following pregnancy loss or termination. Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/sites/ …/Guidance_on_the_disposal_of_pregnancy_remains.pdf
- HTA. (2017a). HTA code A: Guiding principles and the fundamental principle of consent code of practice. Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/hta-codes-practice-and-standards-0
- HTA. (2017b). HTA code B: Post-mortem examination code of practice and standards. https://www.hta.gov.uk/hta-codes-practice-and-standards-0
- HTA. (2019). The Sands perinatal post-mortem consent package. Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/sands-perinatal-post-mortem-consent-package
- HTA. (ND). FAQs: Disposal of pregnancy remains. Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/faqs/disposal-pregnancy-remains
- ICCM. (2015). The sensitive disposal of fetal remains: Policy and guidance for burial and cremation authorities and companies. Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management. https://www.iccm-uk.com/iccm/library/Fetal%20Remains%20Policy%20Updated%20Sept2015%20.pdf
- Infant Cremation Commission. (2014). Report of the infant cremation commission in Scotland in 2014. Scottish Government. https://www.gov.scot/publications/report-infant-cremation-commission/
- Jackson, E. (2001). Regulating reproduction: Law, technology and autonomy. Hart Publishing.
- Jenkins, D. (2015). Report into infant cremations at the Emstrey crematorium shrewsbury. Shropshire Council. Retrieved from https://shropshire.gov.uk/media/6060/independent-inquiry-report.pdf
- Kent, J. (2008). The fetal tissue economy: From the abortion clinic to the stem cell laboratory. Social Science & Medicine, 67(11), 1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.027
- Kiserud, T., Piaggio, G., Carroli, G., Widmer, M., Carvalho, J., Neerup Jensen, L., … Platt, L. D. (2017). The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: A multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Medicine, 14(1), e1002220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002220
- Kuberska, K. (2020). Unwitnessed ceremonies: Funerals for pre-24-week pregnancy losses in England. In S. Kilshaw & K. Borg (Eds.), Navigating miscarriage: Social, medical, and conceptual perspectives (pp. 206–232). Berghahn.
- Layne, L. L. (2000). ‘He was a real baby with baby things’: A material culture analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture, 5(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350000500304
- Layne, L. L. (2006). “Your child deserves a name”: Possessive individualism and the politics of memory in pregnancy loss. In B. Bodenhorn & G. Vom Bruck (Eds.), An anthropology of names and naming (pp. 31–50). Cambridge University Press.
- Mason, K., & Laurie, G. (2001). Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of bristol and alder hey. The Modern Law Review, 64(5), 710–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00347
- McGuinness, S., & Kuberska, K. (2017). Report to the human tissue authority on disposal of pregnancy remains (less than 24 weeks’ gestational stage). Death Before Birth, University of Bristol and University of Birmingham. https://testprojectwebsiteblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/death-before-birth-hta-report-2017.pdf
- Memmi, D. (2011). La seconde vie des bébés morts. Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
- Middlemiss, A. L. (2020). ‘It felt like the longest time of my life’: Using foetal dopplers at home to manage anxiety about miscarriage. In S. Kilshaw & K. Borg (Eds.), Navigating miscarriage: Social, medical and conceptual perspectives (pp. 160–183). Berghahn.
- Mitchell, L. M. (2001). Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects. University of Toronto Press.
- Mitchell, L. M. (2016). “Time with Babe”: Seeing fetal remains after pregnancy termination for impairment. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 30(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12173
- Morgan, L. M. (1999). Materialising the fetal body: Or, what are those corpses doing in biology’s basement? In L. M. Morgan & M. W. Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 43–60). University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Morgan, L. M. (2002). “Properly disposed of”: A history of embryo disposal and the changing claims on fetal remains. Medical Anthropology, 21(3–4), 247–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740214079
- Morgan, L. M., & Roberts, E. F. S. (2012). Reproductive governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine, 19(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2012.675046
- NICE. (2012). Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Diagnosis and initial management. Clinical Guideline: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
- Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Peelen, J. (2009). Reversing the past: Monuments for stillborn children. Mortality, 14(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270902808043
- Pfeffer, N., & Kent, J. (2007). Framing women, framing fetuses: How Britain regulates arrangements for the collection and use of aborted fetuses in stem cell research and therapies. BioSocieties, 2(4), 429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855207005868
- Rapp, R. (2007). Real-time fetus: The role of the sonogram in the age of monitored reproduction. In M. M. Lock & J. Farquhar (Eds.), Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life (pp. 608–622). Duke University Press.
- Rapport, N. (2013). The interview as a form of talking-partnership: Dialectical, focussed, ambiguous, special. In J. Skinner (Ed.), The interview: An ethnographic approach (pp. 53–68). Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
- RCOG. (2011). The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent first-trimester and second-trimester miscarriage. Greentop Guideline no 17: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
- RCOG. (2014). Perinatal management of pregnant women at the threshold of infant viability (The obstetric perspective). Scientific Impact Paper No. 41: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
- Reed, K., Kochetkova, I., & Whitby, E. (2016). Visualising uncertainty: Examining women’s views on the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 164(Suppl. C), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.012
- Rothman, B. K. (1993). The tentative pregnancy: How amniocentesis changes the experience of motherhood. W W Norton and Co.
- Sands. (2013a). Guide for consent takers: Seeking consent/authorisation for the post mortem examination of a baby. Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/sands-perinatal-post-mortem-consent-package
- Sands. (2013b). Sands post-mortem consent form. Human Tissue Authority. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/sands-perinatal-post-mortem-consent-package
- Sanger, C. (2012). “The birth of death”: Stillborn birth certificates and the problem for law. California Law Review, 100(1), 269–312. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1781181
- Sheldon, S. (1997). Beyond control: Medical power and abortion law. Pluto Press.
- Skeggs, B. (2001). Feminist ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 426–442). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Sperling, D. (2008). Posthumous interests: Legal and ethical perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
- Tremain, S. (2006). Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero. Hypatia, 21(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb00963.x
- Troyer, J. (2008). Abuse of a corpse: A brief history and re-theorization of necrophilia laws in the USA. Mortality, 13(2), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270801954518
- UK Government. (1997). Attorney General's Reference No 3 of 1994. retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199798/ldjudgmt/jd970724/gneral01.htm
- Woodthorpe, K. (2012). Baby gardens: A privilege or predicament? In S. Earle, C. Komaromy, & L. L. Layne (Eds.), Understanding reproductive loss: Perspectives on life, death and fertility (pp. 143–154). Ashgate Publishing Limited.
- Woodthorpe, K., & Rumble, H. (2016). Funerals and families: Locating death as a relational issue. British Journal of Sociology, 67(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12190
- Yoshizawa, R. S., & Hird, M. J. (2019). Schrödinger’s placenta: Determining placentas as not/waste. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(1), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619855367