Handedness predicts motivation to switch from the status quo

REFERENCES

• Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124–140. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, K. J., & Corballis, M. C. (2002). Ambidexterity and magical ideation. Laterality, 7, 75–84. doi:10.1080/13576500143000131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 47–58. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199803)11:1<47::AID-BDM278>3.0.CO;2-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D. (1993). Handedness in musicians: Bimanual constraints on performance. Brain and Cognition, 22, 266–272. doi:10.1006/brcg.1993.1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D. (2001). Individual differences in Stroop and local-global processing: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 45, 97–118. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Bentle, M., & Niebauer, C. L. (2007). Handedness differences in body image distortion and eating disorder symptomatology. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 247–256. doi:10.1002/eat.20357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Dion, A., & Propper, R. E. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56, 313–319. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Garvey, K. J., Propper, R. E., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2003). Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories. Neuropsychology, 17, 221. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Henning, B. R., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (2008). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality, 13, 403–426. doi:10.1080/13576500802079646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Jasper, J. D., Sontam, V., & Cooil, B. (2007). Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 63, 51–58. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Phaneuf, K. A., & Propper, R. E. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition, 33, 751–757. doi:10.3758/BF03195341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Brown, T. J. (2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology, 20, 336–345. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Sontam, V., & Jasper, J. D. (2009). Individual differences in ambiguous-figure perception: Degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Perception, 38, 1183–1198. doi:10.1068/p6131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. M., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research, 64, 185–202. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(94)90131-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, P. E., Kertesz, A., & Denenberg, V. H. (1993). Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosurn. Neurology, 43, 2353–2353. doi:10.1212/WNL.43.11.2353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, R. A., & Bingham, B. R. (1985). Induced lateral orientation and persuasibility. Brain and Cognition, 4, 156–164. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(85)90067-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M., Gayraud, D., Oliva, A., Regis, J., Salamon, G., & Khalil, R. (1991). Effects of handedness and sex on the morphology of the corpus callosum: A study with brain magnetic resonance imaging. Brain and Cognition, 16(1), 41–61. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(91)90084-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, R. A., Pass, K., Freeman, H., Bautista, J., & Johnson, C. (1993). Handedness and accidents with injury. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 77, 1119–1122. doi:10.2466/pms.1993.77.3f.1119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S., & Johnson, M. A. (1996). Gain/loss asymmetry and riskless choice: Loss aversion in choices among job finalists. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 225–233. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, J. J., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in repeat purchases versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 116–128. doi:10.1086/339925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2005). A neuropsychological dimension for anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 343–369. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. D., Woolf, J., & Christman, S. D. (2014). Responding to framed health messages: Different strokes for different (handedness) folks. Psychology & Health, 29, 671–686. doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.881999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luders, E., Cherbuin, N., Thompson, P. M., Gutman, B., Anstey, K. J., Sachdev, P., & Toga, A. W. (2010). When more is less: Associations between corpus callosum size and handedness lateralization. NeuroImage, 52, 43–49. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niebauer, C. L., Aselage, J., & Schutte, C. (2002). Interhemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality, 7, 85–96. doi:10.1080/13576500143000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niebauer, C. L., Christman, S. D., Reid, S. A., & Garvey, K. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: Degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality, 9, 433–447. doi:10.1080/13576500342000266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 22–51. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, R. (1977). Cognitive strategies in patients with unilateral temporal lobe excisions. Neuropsychologia, 15, 385–395. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(77)90090-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status-quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59. doi:10.1007/BF00055564
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, S. C. (2000). The quantification and definition of handedness: Implications for handedness research. In M. K. Mandal, M. B. Bulman-Fleming, & G. Tiwari (Eds.), Side bias: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 155–174). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. (1994). Disentangling status quo and omission effects: An experimental analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 457–476. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. (1995). Multiple reference points, framing, and the status-quo bias in health care financing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 69–72. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss-aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061. doi:10.2307/2937956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J. E., Jasper, J. D., & Zelmanova, Y. (2010). Differences in time perception as a function of strength of handedness. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 629–633. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J. E., Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. (2012). Inaction inertia, the sunk cost effect, and handedness: Avoiding the losses of past decisions. Brain and Cognition, 80, 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witelson, S. F. (1985). The brain connection: The corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. Science, 229, 665–668. doi:10.1126/science.4023705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witelson, S. F., & Goldsmith, C. H. (1991). The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Research, 545, 175–182. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(91)91284-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar