A validated set of tool pictures with matched objects and non-objects for laterality research

REFERENCES

• Alcock, J. (1972). The evolution of the use of tools by feeding animals. Evolution, 26, 464–473. doi:10.2307/2407020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. H. (2001). Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science, 291, 1748–1753. doi:10.1126/science.1059487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbib, M. A. (2002). Beyond the mirror system: Imitation and evolution of language. In C. Nehaniv & K. Dautenhan (Eds), Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 229–280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (2002). Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron, 34, 149–159. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00642-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, B. B. (1980). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools. New York, NY: Garland STPM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boesch, C., & Boesch, H. (1990). Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Folia Primatologica, 54, 86–99. doi:10.1159/000156428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 913–919.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage, 12, 478–484. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Na, D. L., Kang, E., Lee, K., Lee, S., & Na, D. (2001). Functional magnetic resonance imaging during pantomiming tool-use gestures. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 311–317. doi:10.1007/s002210100777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C. (2009). The evolution of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 19–43. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04423.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C. (2010). Mirror neurons and the evolution of language. Brain and Language, 112(1), 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C., Badzakova-Trajkov, G., & Haberling, S. (2012). Right hand, left brain: Genetic and evolutionary bases of cerebral asymmetries for language and manual action. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3, 1–17. doi:10.1002/wcs.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de C. Hamilton, A. F., & Grafton, S. T. (2008). Action outcomes are represented in human inferior frontoparietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1160–1168. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobato, J. L., Baron, M., Barriga, F. J., Pareja, J. A., Vela, L., & Sanchez Del Rio, M. (2001). Apraxia cruzada secundaria a infarto parietal derecho [Right parietal infarction is crucial for apraxia]. Revista de Neurología, 33, 725–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, S. H. (2007). What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex, 43, 368–375. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70462-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, S. H. (2008). Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 363, 1951–1957. doi:10.1001/archneur.1979.00500440076016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frey, S. H., Funnell, M. G., Gerry, V. E., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). A dissociation between the representation of tool-use skills and hand dominance: Insights from left- and right-handed callosotomy patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 262–272. doi:10.1162/0898929053124974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridman, E. A., Immisch, I., Hanakawa, T., Bohlhalter, S., Waldvogel, D., Kansaku, K., … Hallett, M. (2006). The role of the dorsal stream for gesture production. NeuroIimage, 29, 417–428. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcea, F. E., Almeida, J., & Mahon, B. Z. (2012). A right visual field advantage for visual processing of manipulable objects. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 813–825. doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0106-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, G., Hermsdörfer, J., Glindemann, R., Rorden, C., & Karnath, H.-O. (2007). Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2769–2776. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, G., & Spatt, J. (2009). The neural basis of tool use. Brain, 132, 1645–1655. doi:10.1093/brain/awp080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212–222. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00089-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, B. L., Hart, L. A., McCoy, M., & Sarath, C. R. (2001). Cognitive behaviour in Asian elephants: Use and modification of branches for fly switching. Animal Behaviour, 62, 839–847. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, K., Goldenberg, G., Daumüller, M., & Hermsdörfer, J. (2005). It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: The neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia, 43, 625–637. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermsdörfer, J., Li, Y., Randerath, J., Goldenberg, G., & Johannsen, L. (2012). Tool use without a tool: Kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 201–214. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3021-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, G. R. (1996). Manufacture and use of hook-tools by new Caledonian crows. Nature, 379, 249–251. doi:10.1038/379249a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Frey, S. H. (2004). The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Frey, S. H., Newman-Norlund, R., & Grafton, S. T. (2005). A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 681–695. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 30–46. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:1<58::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2O
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroliczak, G., & Frey, S. H. (2009). A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2396–2410. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutzen, M., Mann, J., Heithaus, M. R., Connor, R. C., Bejder, L., & Sherwin, W. B. (2005). Cultural transmission of tool use in bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8939–8943. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500232102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, L., Nicolakakis, N., & Boire, D. (2002). Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour, 139, 939–973. doi:10.1163/156853902320387918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. W. (2006). Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist, 12, 211–231. doi:10.1177/1073858406288327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions. Memory & Cognition, 6, 312–319. doi:10.3758/BF03197461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, K. P. (1956). Man the tool-maker. London: British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Osiurak, F., Jarry, C., Allain, P., Aubin, G., Etcharry-Bouyx, F., Richard, I., … Le Gall, D. (2009). Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage. The technical reasoning model. Cortex, 45, 769–783. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perani, D., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Gorno Tempini, M., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (1999). Word and picture matching: A PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia, 37, 293–306. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00073-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, B. (1998). Cognition and tool use. Mind and Language, 13, 513–547. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randerath, J., Goldenberg, G., Spijkers, W., Li, Y., & Hermsdörfer, J. (2010). Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. NeuroImage, 53, 171–180. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210, 419–421. doi:10.1007/s00429-005-0039-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670. doi:10.1038/35090060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St Amant, R., & Horton, T. E. (2008). Revisiting the definition of animal tool use. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1199–1208. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, J., & Uomini, N. (2009). Can the archaeology of manual specialization tell us anything about language evolution? A survey of the state of play. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(1), 97–110. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, D., & Chaminade, T. (2012). Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 75–87. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uomini, N. T., & Meyer, G. F. (2013). Shared brain lateralization patterns in language and acheulean stone tool production: A functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. PLoS One, 8, e72693. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenstein, E., & Heilman, K. M. (1979). Apraxic agraphia with neglect-induced paragraphia. Archives of Neurology, 36, 506–508. doi:10.1001/archneur.1979.00500440076016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Diepen, P. M. J., & De Graef, P. (1994). Line-drawing library and software toolbox (Psychology Report No. 165). Leuven: University of Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• van Lawick-Goodall, J. (1970). Tool-using in primates and other vertebrates. In D. Lehrman, R. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 195–249). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Schaik, C. P., Ancrenaz, M., Borgen, G., Galdikas, B., Knott, C. D., Singleton, I., … Merrill, M. (2003). Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science, 299, 102–105. doi:10.1126/science.1078004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). A right visual field advantage for tool-recognition in the visual half field paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2342–2348. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingerhoets, G., Alderweireldt, A. S, Vandemaele, P., Cai, Q., Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., & Achten, E. (2013). Praxis and language are linked: Evidence from co-lateralization in individuals with atypical language dominance. Cortex, 49, 172–183. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, J. J., Bowers, C. A., & Vogel, D. S. (2003). Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Brain and Cognition, 52, 197–204. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00056-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R., & McSorley, E. (2006). The parallel programming of voluntary and reflexive saccades. Vision Research, 46, 2082–2093. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, G. C., & Fragaszy, D. M. (1987). The manufacture and use of tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101, 159–168. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.101.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar