The influence of distractors and numerical direction on mental number line bisection

References

• Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudogneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line besction task. Neuropsychologia, 18(4–5), 491–498. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelletti, M., Freeman, E. D., & Cipolotti, L. (2007). The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 2989–3000. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122(3), 371–396. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.122.3.371
   Google Scholar
• Doricchi, F., Guariglia, P., Gasparini, M., & Tomaiuolo, F. (2005). Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage. Nature Neuroscience, 8(12), 1663–1665. doi:10.1038/nn1563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drain, M., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1996). Vertical orienting bias: Evidence for attentional bias and ‘neglect’ in the intact brain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 139–158. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555–556. doi:10.1038/nn1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2007). High perceptual load makes everybody equal: Eliminating individual differences in distractibility with load. Psychological Science, 18(5), 377–381. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01908.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Attentional capture by entirely irrelevant distractors. Visual Cognition, 16(2–3), 200–214. doi:10.1080/13506280701465049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 126–132. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. (1984). More complexities in subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 214–225. doi:10.2307/748350
   Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Lammertyn, J., Notebaert, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 122(3), 221–233. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göbel, S. M., Calabria, M., Farnè, A., & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating ‘spatial’ neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 860–868. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 435–448. doi:10.1038/nrn1684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, Y., & Hatta, T. (2004). Spatial structure of quantitative represenation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory and Cognition, 32(4), 662–673. doi:10.3758/BF03195857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeerakathil, T. J., & Kirk, A. (1994). A representational vertical bias. Neurology, 44(4), 703–703. doi:10.1212/WNL.44.4.703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93–110. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci, 9(2), 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 143–148. doi:10.1177/0963721410370295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonards, U., Stone, S., & Mohr, C. (2013). Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases. Experimental Brain Research, 228(4), 513–525. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3583-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E., Mattingley, J. B., Chapman, H. L., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2009). Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 925–945. doi:10.1080/17470210802305318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2007). Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), 1400–1407. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E. (2001). Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 39(10), 1065–1076. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00044-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37(7), 843–855. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00140-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E. R., Mattingley, J. B., Berberovic, N., Smith, A., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2004). An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3), 289–301. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E. R., & McIlroy, A. M. (2010). Spatial cues affect mental number line bisections. Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 315–319. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E. R., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2013). The Flinders handedness survey (FLANDERS): A brief measure of skilled hand preference. Cortex, 49, 2914–2926. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E. R., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., Wignall, S., Yates, M. J., Forte, J. D., & Spence, C. J. (2012). The relationship between vertical stimulation and horizontal attentional asymmetries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(12), 2384–2396. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.688979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25. doi:10.1080/00335558008248231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278. doi:10.1037/h0028573
   Google Scholar
• Rossetti, Y., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Rode, G., Ota, H., Michel, C., & Boisson, D. (2004). Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuo-manual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychological Science, 15(6), 426–430. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00696.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotondaro, F., Merola, S., Aiello, M., Pinto, M., & Doricchi, F. (2015). Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number—line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 75, 565–576. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Wolf, J. D. (1963). Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6(1), 99–105. doi:10.1080/00140136308930679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49(1), 83–90. doi:10.3758/BF03211619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(6), 599–606. doi:10.3758/BF03211656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. A., Castine, B. R., Loetscher, T., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2015). Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left. Cortex, 64, 179–193. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. A., & Elias, L. J. (2011). Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries. Brain Research, 1387, 108–115. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 483–488. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual-search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 601–621. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Bonato, M., Treccani, B., Scalambrin, G., Marenzi, R., & Priftis, K. (2012). Neglect impairs explicit processing of the mental number line. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., Meneghello, F., Marenzi, R., & Umiltà, C. (2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1061–1067. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar