The Tapley and Bryden test of performance differences between the hands: The original data, newer data, and the relation to pegboard and other tasks

References

• Annett, J., Annett, M., Hudson, P. T. W., & Turner, A. (1979). The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31(4), 641–652. doi: 10.1080/14640747908400755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, J., Golby, C. W., & Kay, H. (1958). The measurement of elements in an assembly task – the information output of the human motor system. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/17470215808416248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1970a). A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61(3), 303–321. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01248.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1970b). The growth of manual preference and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 61(4), 545–558. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01274.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1972). The distribution of manual asymmetry. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 343–358. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb01282.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1976). A coordination of hand preference and skill replicated. British Journal of Psychology, 67(4), 587–592. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1976.tb01550.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1985a). Left, right, hand and brain: The right shift theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1985b). Which theory fails? A reply to McManus. British Journal of Psychology, 76(1), 17–29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01927.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M. (1992). Five tests of hand skill. Cortex, 28(4), 583–600. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80229-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M., Hudson, P. T. W., & Turner, A. (1974). The reliability of differences between the hands in motor skill. Neuropsychologia, 12(4), 527–531. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90083-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annett, M., & Kilshaw, D. (1983). Right and left-hand skill: II. Estimating the parameters of the distribution of L-R differences in males and females. British Journal of Psychology, 74(2), 269–283. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01862.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (1980). Handedness, clumsiness, and cognitive ability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 22(5), 569–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1980.tb04370.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borod, J. C., Koff, E., & Caron, H. S. (1984). The target test: A brief laterality measure of speed and accuracy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58(3), 743–748. doi: 10.2466/pms.1984.58.3.743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandler, W. M., Morris, A. P., Evans, D. M., Scerri, T. S., Kemp, J. R., Timpson, N. J., … Paracchini, S. (2013). Common variants in left/right asymmetry genes and pathways are associated with relative hand skill. PLoS Genetics, 9(9), e1003751. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). BOT-2: Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia, 15(4–5), 617–624. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(77)90067-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, P. J. (1998). The origins of manual asymmetries: What is revealed by pushing the limits of task difficulty (PhD thesis). University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON. Retrieved from https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/301?show=full.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, P. J. (2015). The influence of M.P.Bryden's work on lateralization of motor skill: Is the preferred hand selected for and better at tasks requiring a high degree of skill? Laterality. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1099661.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, P. J., & Allard, F. (1998). Does extended practice affect the magnitude of manual asymmetries on a Pegboard task? Brain and Cognition, 37(1), 44–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (1999). Spatial task demands affect the extent of manual asymmetries. Laterality, 4(1), 27–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2005). A new method of administering the Grooved pegboard test: Performance as a function of handedness and sex. Brain and Cognition, 58(3), 258–268. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, P. J., Roy, E. A., Rohr, L. E., & Egilo, S. (2007). Task demands affect manual asymmetries in pegboard performance. Laterality, 12(4), 364–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossman, E. R. F. W., & Goodeve, P. J. (1983). Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts’ Law. Paper presented at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, Oxford, July 1963. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 251–278. doi: 10.1080/14640748308402133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlin, J. M., Leppanen, M. L., Fain, R. J., Hackländer, R. P., Hanaver-Torrez, S. D., & Lyle, K. B. (2015). On the use (and misuse?) of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Brain and Cognition, 94, 44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. doi: 10.1037/h0055392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flowers, K. (1975). Handedness and controlled movement. British Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 39–52. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01438.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francks, C., Fisher, S. E., MacPhie, L., Richardson, A. J., Marlow, A. J., Stein, J. F., & Monaco, A. P. (2002). A genomewide linkage screen for relative hand skill in sibling pairs. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70(3), 800–805. doi: 10.1086/339249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: W H Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Kilshaw, D., & Annett, M. (1983). Right- and left-hand skill I: Effects of age, sex and hand preference showing superior skill in left-handers. British Journal of Psychology, 74(2), 253–268. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01861.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C. (1979). Determinants of laterality in man (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Cambridge. Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/medical-education/publications/phd.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C. (1983). The interpretation of laterality. Cortex, 19(2), 187–214. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(83)80014-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C. (1985a). Right- and left-hand skill: Failure of the right shift model. British Journal of Psychology, 76(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01926.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C. (1985b). On testing the right shift theory: A reply to Annett. British Journal of Psychology, 76(1), 31–34. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01928.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1976). Unilateral control of bilaterally symmetrical movement as factor in lateralization of speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42(3), 841–842. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.3.841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1981). Handedness: effect of prolonged practice on between hand performance differences. Neuropsychologia, 19(4), 587–590. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(81)90025-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M., & Davison, L. A. (1974). Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications. Washington, DC: Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. G. (1985). Lateralized behavioral and neurochemical consequences of unilateral brain injury in rats. In S. D. Glick (Ed.), Cerebral lateralization in non-human species (pp. 135–156). Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scerri, T. S., Brandler, W. M., Paracchini, S., Morris, A. P., Ring, S. M., Richardson, A. J., & Monaco, A. P. (2011). PCSK6 is associated with handedness in individuals with dyslexia. Human Molecular Genetics, 20(3), 608–614. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingrueber, H. J. (1975). Handedness as a function of test complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40(1), 263–266. doi: 10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stott, D. H., Moyes, F. A., & Henderson, S. E. (1972). Test of motor impairment. Guelph, Ontario: Brook Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Tapley, S. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1985). A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia, 23(2), 215–221. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90105-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. L., Heaton, R. K., Matthews, C. G., & Grant, I. (1987). Comparison of preferred and nonpreferred hand performance on four neuropsychological motor tasks. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1(4), 324–334. doi: 10.1080/13854048708520068
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, J. D. (1992). Brain structural abnormality and laterality in schizophrenia (Unpublished PhD thesis). University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, J. D., & McManus, I. C. (1994). Task difficulty and hand differences in peg moving, circle marking and square tracing (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/medical-education/resources/Tests/VanHornAndMcManusCircleMarkingTask.
   Google Scholar
• Westwood, D., Roy, E. A., Bryden, P. J., Bryden, M. P., & Roy, P. E. (1998). Increasing postural demands may affect the magnitude of manual asymmetries. Brain and Cognition, 37(1), 40–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, A. M. (1983). Crossman and Goodeve (1963): Twenty years on. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 245–249. doi: 10.1080/14640748308402132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar