Wait wait, don't tell me: Handedness questionnaires do not predict hand preference for grasping

References

• Annett, J., Annett, M., Hudson, P., & Turner, A. (1979). The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31(4), 641–652. doi: 10.1080/14640747908400755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benderlioglu, Z., & Nelson, R. J. (2004). Digit length ratios predict reactive aggression in women, but not in men. Hormones and Behavior, 46(5), 558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., Ross, V. A., Daniels, M. S., & Bright, P. (1996). The measurement of hand preference: A validation study comparing three groups of right-handers. British Journal of Psychology, 87(2), 269–285. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02590.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Roy, E., Rohr, L., & Bryden, P. (2006). Using hand performance measures to predict handedness. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition, 11(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/1357650054200000440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. G., Roy, E. A., Rohr, L. E., Snider, B. R., & Bryden, P. (2004). Preference and performance measures of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 55(2), 283–285. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. C., de Bruin, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2013). Visually-guided grasping: a study of visuospatial load (Manuscript in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. C., & Gonzalez, C. (2013, April 13–16). Neglect beyond the brain-damaged: Left extrapersonal space neglect in healthy participants during a visually guided grasping task. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting, San Fransico, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia, 15(4), 617–624. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(77)90067-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, M., Hécaen, H., & DeAgostini, M. (1983). Patterns of cerebral organization. Brain and Language, 20(2), 249–262. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(83)90044-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, P., Pryde, K., & Roy, E. (2000a). A developmental analysis of the relationship between hand preference and performance: II. A performance-based method of measuring hand preference in children. Brain and Cognition, 44, 60–64. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1999.1201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, P., Pryde, K., & Roy, E. (2000b). A performance measure of the degree of hand preference. Brain and Cognition, 44(3), 402–414. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1999.1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, F. M., Grimshaw, G. M., & Wilson, M. S. (2009). The role of intellectual openness in the relationship between hand preference and positive schizotypy. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 14(5), 441–456. doi: 10.1080/13576500802349684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavill, S., & Bryden, P. (2003). Development of handedness: Comparison of questionnaire and performance-based measures of preference. Brain and Cognition, 53(2), 149–151. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00098-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1987). The measurement of handedness. Brain and Cognition, 6(2), 175–183. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(87)90118-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerke, A., & Clerke, J. (2001). A literature review of the effect of handedness on isometric grip strength differences of the left and right hands. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(2), 206–211. doi: 10.5014/ajot.55.2.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coren, S., & Porac, C. (1978). The validity and reliability of self-report items for the measurement of lateral preference. British Journal of Psychology, 69(2), 207–211. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1978.tb01649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2013, June 7–9). Spatial attention biases in visually-guided grasping amongst healthy adults. Paper presented at the Canadian society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Calgary, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, I. (2008). Bimanual simultaneous movements and hemispheric dominance: Timing of events reveals hard-wired circuitry for action, speech, and imagination. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1(1), 1–9. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S4132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dragovic, M. (2004). Towards an improved measure of the Edinburgh handedness inventory: A one-factor congeneric measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 9(4), 411–419. doi: 10.1080/13576500342000248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragovic, M., Milenkovic, S., & Hammond, G. (2008). The distribution of hand preference is discrete: A taxometric examination. British Journal of Psychology, 99(4), 445–459. doi: 10.1348/000712608X304450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlin, J. M., Leppanen, M. L., Fain, R. J., Hackländer, R. P., Hanaver-Torrez, S. D., & Lyle, K. B. (2015). On the use (and misuse?) of the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Brain and Cognition, 94, 44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, L., Bryden, M., & Bulman-Fleming, M. (1998). Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 36(1), 37–43. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00107-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, J. N., & Russell, S. T. (2017). Have mischievous responders misidentified sexual minority youth disparities in the national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1053–1067. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0993-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., De Bruin, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2014, May). One track mind: Young adults prioritize grasp production over obstacle clearance while walking. Paper presented at the Banff annual seminar in Cognitive Science, Banff, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., Doan, J. B., & Gonzalez, C. (2014). Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp action. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(4), 489–507. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.862540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., & Gonzalez, C. (2013). On the evolution of handedness: Evidence for feeding biases. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., & Gonzalez, C. (2014). Eating interrupted: The effect of intent on hand-to-mouth actions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112(8), 2019–2025. doi: 10.1152/jn.00295.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., & Gonzalez, C. (2015). Children’s bilateral advantage for grasp-to-eat actions becomes unimanual by age 10years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 133, 57–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., & Gonzalez, C. (2016). The destination defines the journey: An examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(5), 2105–2113. doi: 10.1152/jn.00222.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., & Gonzalez, C. (2017). The inimitable mouth: Task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision. Experimental Brain Research, 235(6), 1945–1952. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4943-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flindall, J. W., Stone, K., & Gonzalez, C. (2015). Evidence for right-hand feeding biases in a left-handed population. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 20(3), 287–305. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.961472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, A. R. (1993). Table for conversion of Kendall’s Tau to spearman’s Rho within the context of measures of magnitude of effect for meta-analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 87–92. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., Flindall, J. W., & Stone, K. (2014). Hand preference across the lifespan: Effects of end-goal, task nature, and object location. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1579), 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. (2006). Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3496–3501. doi: 10.1152/jn.01187.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., Ganel, T., Whitwell, R., Morrissey, B., & Goodale, M. (2008). Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 624–631. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., & Goodale, M. (2009). Hand preference for precision grasping predicts language lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3182–3189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., Mills, K. J., Genee, I., Li, F., Piquette, N., Rosen, N., & Gibb, R. (2014). Getting the right grasp on executive function. Frontiers In Psychology, 5(89), ‌1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C., Whitwell, R. L., Morrissey, B., Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. (2007). Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 275–279. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1090-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosskopf, A., & Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P. (2006). Grasping with the left and right hand: A kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 230–240. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0083-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grouios, G. (2006). Right hand advantage in visually guided reaching and aiming movements: Brief review and comments. Ergonomics, 49(10), 1013–1017. doi: 10.1080/00140130600665349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, T., Sheu, C. F., & Michel, G. F. (2003). Infant hand-use preferences for grasping objects contributes to the development of a hand-use preference for manipulating objects. Developmental Psychobiology, 43(4), 328–334. doi: 10.1002/dev.10142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, J., & Stirling, J. (2003). Fine motor skill performance in left-and right-handers: Evidence of an advantage for left-handers. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 8(4), 297–306. doi: 10.1080/13576500342000022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Mantia, C., Gonzalez, C., & Brown, L. E. (2013, June 7–9). Lateralization of near-hand effects while judging graspability. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour and Cognitive Science, Calgary, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, J., & Gonzalez, C. (2013, February 21–23). The effect of action observation on EMG activity of the flexor pollicis brevis and flexor digitorum superficialis muscles: A preliminary study. Paper presented at the Canadian spring conference on Behaviour and Brain, Fernie, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K., Gibb, R., MacLean, J., Netelenbos, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2015). The relationship between motor lateralization and executive function. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 47(Pt A), 89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.04.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K., & Gonzalez, C. (2013, April 13–16). Interaction of the two visual systems in a grasping task. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Netelenbos, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2012, February 23–25). On the relations between motor affordances and object categorization. Paper presented at the Canadian spring conference on Behaviour and Brain, Fernie, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Netelenbos, N., & Gonzalez, C. (2015). Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge. Brain and Cognition, 93, 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papademetriou, E., Sheu, C.-F., & Michel, G. F. (2005). A meta-analysis of primate hand preferences, particularly for reaching. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1998). Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 3(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1080/713754291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raczkowski, D., Kalat, J. W., & Nebes, R. (1974). Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. Neuropsychologia, 12(1), 43–47. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(74)90025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. doi: 10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L., & Palmiter-Thomas, P. (1996). Grip strength measurement: A critical review of tools, methods, and clinical utility. Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 8(1–2), 87–109. doi: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v8.i1-2.50
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. (1978). A factor analysis of self-reported handedness. Neuropsychologia, 16(6), 747–748. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(78)90010-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson-Cimpian, J. P. (2014). Inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders: Several suggestions to assess conclusions. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 171–185. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14534297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. J. (2009). Hand and paw preferences in relation to the lateralized brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1519), 943–954. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, B., Mills, K., & Gonzalez, C. (2013, February 21–23). Snarc effect: Influences of number magnitude on grasping behaviour. Paper presented at the Canadian spring conference on Behaviour and Brain, Fernie, BC.
   Google Scholar
• Sacrey, L. A. R., Arnold, B., Whishaw, I. Q., & Gonzalez, C. (2013). Precocious hand use preference in reach-to-eat behavior versus manual construction in 1-to 5-year-old children. Developmental Psychobiology, 55(8), 902–911. doi: 10.1002/dev.21083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharoun, S. M., & Bryden, P. (2014). Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(82), 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhuis, R. E., & Bryden, M. (1989). Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities. Cortex, 25(2), 289–304. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80044-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhuis, R. E., Bryden, M., Schwartz, M., & Lawson, S. (1990). Reliability of hand preference items and factors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12(6), 921–930. doi: 10.1080/01688639008401031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, K., Bryant, D., & Gonzalez, C. (2013). Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: Evidence for different roles? Experimental Brain Research, 224(3), 455–467. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, K., & Gonzalez, C. (2013, April 13–16). Grasping without vision: Hand preference in sighted and congenitally blind individuals. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting, San Fransico, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, K., & Gonzalez, C. (2014). Grasping with the eyes of your hands: Hapsis and vision modulate hand preference. Experimental Brain Research, 232(2), 385–393. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3746-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretriluxana, J., Gordon, J., & Winstein, C. J. (2008). Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 305–315. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1364-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale, J. F. (2014). Edinburgh handedness inventory–short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(2), 164–177. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D. A. (2003). JMASM9: Converting kendall’s tau for correlational or meta-analytic analyses. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 2(2), 525–530. doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1067646360
   Google Scholar
• White, K., & Ashton, R. (1976). Handedness assessment inventory. Neuropsychologia, 14(2), 261–264. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(76)90058-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. M. (1986). Factor analysis of the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Cortex, 22(2), 325–326. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(86)80058-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar