Publication Cover
Laterality
Asymmetries of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognition
Volume 24, 2019 - Issue 6
7,995
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry

ORCID Icon
Pages 740-771 | Received 17 Jan 2019, Accepted 18 Mar 2019, Published online: 28 Mar 2019

References

  • Aghamollaei, M., Jafari, Z., Tahaei, A., Toufan, R., Keyhani, M., Rahimzade, S., & Esmaeili, M. (2013). Dichotic assessment of verbal memory function: Development and validation of the Persian version of dichotic verbal memory test. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(8), 684–688.
  • Arciuli, J., Rankine, T., & Monaghan, P. (2010). Auditory discrimination of voice-onset time and its relationship with reading ability. Laterality: Asymmetries of body, Brain and Cognition, 15(3), 343–360.
  • Asbjørnsen, A. E., & Bryden, M. (1996). Biased attention and the fused dichotic words test. Neuropsychologia, 34(5), 407–411.
  • Babkoff, H. (1975). Dichotic temporal interactions: Fusion and temporal order. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(4), 267–272.
  • Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
  • Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575–589.
  • Barron, H. C., Garvert, M. M., & Behrens, T. E. (2016). Repetition suppression: A means to index neural representations using BOLD? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1705), 20150355.
  • Bayazıt, O., Öniz, A., Hahn, C., Güntürkün, O., & Özgören, M. (2009). Dichotic listening revisited: Trial-by-trial ERP analyses reveal intra-and interhemispheric differences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 536–545.
  • Bedoin, N., Ferragne, E., & Marsico, E. (2010). Hemispheric asymmetries depend on the phonetic feature: A dichotic study of place of articulation and voicing in French stops. Brain and Language, 115(2), 133–140.
  • Belmore, S. M. (1981). The fate of ear asymmetries in short-term memory. Brain and Language, 12(1), 101–115.
  • Berlin, C. I., Lowe-Bell, S. S., Cullen Jr, J. K., Thompson, C. L., & Loovis, C. F. (1973). Dichotic speech perception: An interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53(3), 699–709.
  • Berlin, C. I., Lowe-Bell, S. S., Cullen Jr, J. K., Thompson, C. L., & Stafford, M. R. (1972). Is speech “special”? Perhaps the temporal lobectomy patient can tell us. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52(2B), 702–705.
  • Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., Arciuli, J., Kompus, K., Gudmundsen, M., & Hugdahl, K. (2013). Right on all occasions?—On the feasibility of laterality research using a smartphone dichotic listening application. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(42), doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00042
  • Bless, J. J., Westerhausen, R., Torkildsen, J. V., Gudmundsen, M., Kompus, K., & Hugdahl, K. (2015). Laterality across languages: Results from a global dichotic listening study using a smartphone application. Laterality, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2014.997245
  • Bloch, M. I., & Hellige, J. B. (1989). Stimulus intensity, attentional instructions, and the ear advantage during dichotic listening. Brain & Cognition, 9(1), 136–148.
  • Brancucci, A., Della Penna, S., Babiloni, C., Vecchio, F., Capotosto, P., Rossi, D., … Rossini, P. M. (2008). Neuromagnetic functional coupling during dichotic listening of speech sounds. Human Brain Mapping, 29(3), 253–264.
  • Braun, C. M., Sapinleduc, A., Picard, C., Bonnenfant, E., Achim, A., & Daigneault, S. (1994). Zaidel′ s model of interhemispheric dynamics: Empirical tests, a critical appraisal, and a proposed revision. Brain & Cognition, 24(1), 57–86.
  • Broadbent, D. E. (1952). Listening to one of two synchronous messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44(1), 51–55.
  • Broadbent, D. E. (1956). Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8(4), 145–152.
  • Bruder, G. E., Alvarenga, J., Abraham, K., Skipper, J., Warner, V., Voyer, D., … Weissman, M. M. (2016). Brain laterality, depression and anxiety disorders: New findings for emotional and verbal dichotic listening in individuals at risk for depression. Laterality: Asymmetries of body, Brain and Cognition, 21(4–6), 525–548.
  • Bryden, M. (1962). Order of report in dichotic listening. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 291–299.
  • Bryden, M. (1964). The manipulation of strategies of report in dichotic listening. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 18(2), 126–138.
  • Bryden, M. (1975). Speech lateralization in families: A preliminary study using dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 2, 201–211.
  • Bryden, M. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research (pp. 1–43). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
  • Bryden, M., & MacRae, L. (1988). Dichotic laterality effects obtained with emotional words. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, Behavioral Neurology, 1, 171–176.
  • Bryden, M., Munhall, K., & Allard, F. (1983). Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 18(2), 236–248.
  • Bryden, M., & Murray, J. E. (1985). Toward a model of dichotic listening performance. Brain & Cognition, 4(3), 241–257.
  • Bryden, M., & Sprott, D. (1981). Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia, 19(4), 571–581.
  • Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50.
  • Cai, Q., Lavidor, M., Brysbaert, M., Paulignan, Y., & Nazir, T. A. (2008). Cerebral lateralization of frontal lobe language processes and lateralization of the posterior visual word processing system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), 672–681.
  • Cameron, S., Glyde, H., Dillon, H., Whitfield, J., & Seymour, J. (2016). The dichotic digits difference test (DDdT): Development. Normative data, and test-retest reliability studies part 1. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 27(6), 458–469.
  • Cherry, E. C. (1953). On the recognition of speech with one, and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.
  • Clark, C., Geffen, L., & Geffen, G. (1988). Invariant properties of auditory perceptual asymmetry assessed by dichotic monitoring. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research (pp. 71–83). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Son.
  • Clarke, J. M., Lufkin, R. B., & Zaidel, E. (1993). Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performace: Individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition? Neuropsychologia, 31(6), 547–557.
  • Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369–390.
  • Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.
  • Cutting, J. E. (1976). Auditory and linguistic processes in speech perception: Inferences from six fusions in dichotic listening. Psychological Review, 83(2), 114–140.
  • D'Anselmo, A., Marzoli, D., & Brancucci, A. (2016). The influence of memory and attention on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Hearing Research, 342, 144–149.
  • de Bode, S., Sininger, Y., Healy, E. W., Mathern, G. W., & Zaidel, E. (2007). Dichotic listening after cerebral hemispherectomy: Methodological and theoretical observations. Neuropsychologia, 45(11), 2461–2466.
  • Dos Santos Sequeira, S., Specht, K., Hämäläinen, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2008). The effects of background noise on dichotic listening to consonant–vowel syllables. Brain and Language, 107(1), 11–15.
  • Dos Santos Sequeira, S., Specht, K., Moosmann, M., Westerhausen, R., & Hugdahl, K. (2010). The effects of background noise on dichotic listening to consonant-vowel syllables: An fMRI study. Laterality, 15(6), 577–596.
  • Dos Santos Sequeira, S., Woerner, W., Walter, C., Kreuder, F., Lueken, U., Westerhausen, R., … Wittling, W. (2006). Handedness, dichotic-listening ear advantage, and gender effects on planum temporale asymmetry—a volumetric investigation using structural magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 622–636.
  • Dramsdahl, M., Westerhausen, R., Haavik, J., Hugdahl, K., & Plessen, K. J. (2011). Cognitive control in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 188(3), 406–410.
  • Fernandes, M. A., & Smith, M. L. (2000). Comparing the fused dichotic words test and the intracarotid amobarbital procedure in children with epilepsy. Neuropsychologia, 38(9), 1216–1228.
  • Fernandes, M. A., Smith, M., Logan, W., Crawley, A., & McAndrews, M. (2006). Comparing language lateralization determined by dichotic listening and fMRI activation in frontal and temporal lobes in children with epilepsy. Brain and Language, 96(1), 106–114.
  • Foundas, A. L., Corey, D. M., Hurley, M. M., & Heilman, K. M. (2006). Verbal dichotic listening in right and left-handed adults: Laterality effects of directed attention. Cortex, 42(1), 79–86.
  • Freides, D. (1977). Do dichotic listening procedures measure lateralization of information processing or retrieval strategy? Perception & Psychophysics, 21(3), 259–263.
  • Geffen, G. (1976). Development of hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Cortex, 12(4), 337–346.
  • Geffen, G., & Caudrey, D. (1981). Reliability and validity of the dichotic monitoring test for language laterality. Neuropsychologia, 19(3), 413–423.
  • Gootjes, L., Bouma, A., Van Strien, J. W., Van Schijndel, R., Barkhof, F., & Scheltens, P. (2006). Corpus callosum size correlates with asymmetric performance on a dichotic listening task in healthy aging but not in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.002
  • Green, M. F., Hugdahl, K., & Mitchell, S. (1994). Dichotic listening during auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(3), 357–362.
  • Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 14–23.
  • Grimshaw, G. M., Kwasny, K. M., Covell, E., & Johnson, R. A. (2003). The dynamic nature of language lateralization: Effects of lexical and prosodic factors. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1008–1019.
  • Hahn, C., Neuhaus, A. H., Pogun, S., Dettling, M., Kotz, S. A., Hahn, E., … Güntürkün, O. (2011). Smoking reduces language lateralization: A dichotic listening study with control participants and schizophrenia patients. Brain & Cognition, 76(2), 300–309.
  • Hakvoort, B., van der Leij, A., van Setten, E., Maurits, N., Maassen, B., & van Zuijen, T. (2016). Dichotic listening as an index of lateralization of speech perception in familial risk children with and without dyslexia. Brain & Cognition, 109, 75–83.
  • Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402.
  • Hiscock, M., Cole, L. C., Benthall, J. G., Carlson, V. L., & Ricketts, J. M. (2000). Toward solving the inferential problem in laterality research: Effects of increased reliability on the validity of the dichotic listening right-ear advantage. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6(5), 539–547.
  • Hiscock, M., & Kinsbourne, M. (2011). Attention and the right-ear advantage: What is the connection? Brain and Cognition, 76(2), 263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.016
  • Hjelmervik, H., Westerhausen, R., Osnes, B., Endresen, C. B., Hugdahl, K., Hausmann, M., & Specht, K. (2012). Language lateralization and cognitive control across the menstrual cycle assessed with a dichotic-listening paradigm. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(11), 1866–1875.
  • Hodgetts, S., Weis, S., & Hausmann, M. (2015). Sex hormones affect language lateralisation but not cognitive control in normally cycling women. Hormones & Behavior, 74, 194–200.
  • Hugdahl, K., & Anderson, L. (1984). A dichotic listening study of differences in cerebral organization in dextral and sinistral subjects. Cortex, 20(1), 135–141.
  • Hugdahl, K., & Andersson, L. (1986). The “forced-attention paradigm” in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: A comparison between adults and children. Cortex, 22(3), 417–432.
  • Hugdahl, K., Carlsson, G., Uvebrant, P., & Lundervold, A. J. (1997). Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents: Preoperative and postoperative comparisons. Archives of Neurology, 54(12), 1494–1500.
  • Hugdahl, K., & Hammar, Å. (1997). Test-retest reliability for the consonant-vowel syllables dichotic listening paradigm. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 19(5), 667–675.
  • Hugdahl, K., Westerhausen, R., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., & Hämäläinen, H. (2008). The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neuroscience Letters, 431(1), 90–94.
  • Hugdahl, K., Westerhausen, R., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., Laine, M., & Hämäläinen, H. (2009). Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 11–22.
  • Jäncke, L. (2002). Does “callosal relay” explain ear advantage in dichotic monitoring? Laterality, 7(4), 309–320.
  • Jäncke, L., & Steinmetz, H. (1994). Interhemispheric transfer time and corpus callosum size. Neuroreport, 5(17), 2385–2388.
  • Jäncke, L., Steinmetz, H., & Volkmann, J. (1992). Dichotic listening: What does it measure? Neuropsychologia, 30(11), 941–950.
  • Kimura, D. (1961a). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 15(3), 166–171.
  • Kimura, D. (1961b). Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 15(3), 156–165.
  • Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 3, 163–178.
  • Kimura, D. (2011). From ear to brain. Brain & Cognition, 76(2), 214–217.
  • Kompus, K., Specht, K., Ersland, L., Juvodden, H. T., van Wageningen, H., Hugdahl, K., & Westerhausen, R. (2012). A forced-attention dichotic listening fMRI study on 113 subjects. Brain and Language, 121(3), 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.004
  • Kompus, K., Westerhausen, R., Nilsson, L. G., Hugdahl, K., Jongstra, S., Berglund, A., … Savic, I. (2011). Deficits in inhibitory executive functions in Klinefelter (47, XXY) syndrome. Psychiatry Research, 189(1), 135–140.
  • Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., & Fischer, J. S. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36.
  • Marshall, J. C., Caplan, D., & Holmes, J. M. (1975). The measure of laterality. Neuropsychologia, 13(3), 315–321.
  • McCulloch, K., Lachner Bass, N., Dial, H., Hiscock, M., & Jansen, B. (2017). Interaction of attention and acoustic factors in dichotic listening for fused words. Laterality, 22(4), 473–494.
  • McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
  • McManus, I. (1983). The interpretation of laterality. Cortex, 19(2), 187–214.
  • Moncrieff, D. (2015). Age-and gender-specific normative information from children assessed with a dichotic words test. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 26(7), 632–644.
  • Moncrieff, D., & Dubyne, L. (2017). Enhanced identification of long versus short voice onset time consonant–vowel syllables in a dichotic listening task. American Journal of Audiology, 26(4), 555–561.
  • Mondor, T. A., & Bryden, M. P. (1991). The influence of attention on the dichotic REA. Neuropsychologia, 29(12), 1179–1190.
  • Monsell, S., Doyle, M., & Haggard, P. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 43–71.
  • Musiek, F. E. (1983). Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear and Hearing, 4(2), 79–83.
  • Ocklenburg, S., & Güntürkün, O. (2018). The lateralized brain: The neuroscience and evolution of hemispheric asymmetries. London: Academic Press.
  • Ocklenburg, S., Hugdahl, K., & Westerhausen, R. (2013). Structural white matter asymmetries in relation to functional asymmetries during speech perception and production. Neuroimage, 83, 1088–1097.
  • Passow, S., Westerhausen, R., Wartenburger, I., Hugdahl, K., Heekeren, H. R., Lindenberger, U., & Li, S.-C. (2012). Human aging compromises attentional control of auditory perception. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 99–105.
  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (2013). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. New York, USA: Psychology Press.
  • Peelle, J. E. (2018). Listening effort: How the cognitive consequences of acoustic challenge are reflected in brain and behavior. Ear Hearing, 39(2), 204–214.
  • Penner, I.-K., Schläfli, K., Opwis, K., & Hugdahl, K. (2009). The role of working memory in dichotic-listening studies of auditory laterality. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(8), 959–966.
  • Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134–144.
  • Repp, B. H. (1976). Identification of dichotic fusions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60(2), 456–469.
  • Rimol, L. M., Eichele, T., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant–vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 191–196.
  • Robb, M. P., Lynn, W. L., & O’Beirne, G. A. (2013). An exploration of dichotic listening among adults who stutter. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27(9), 681–693.
  • Roup, C. M., Wiley, T. L., & Wilson, R. H. (2006). Dichotic word recognition in young and older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(4), 230–240.
  • Sætrevik, B., & Hugdahl, K. (2007a). Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology, 21(3), 285–290.
  • Sætrevik, B., & Hugdahl, K. (2007b). Priming inhibits the right ear advantage in dichotic listening: Implications for auditory laterality. Neuropsychologia, 45(2), 282–287.
  • Shankweiler, D., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1975). A continuum of lateralization for speech perception. Brain and Language, 2(2), 212–225.
  • Simos, P. G., Molfese, D. L., & Brenden, R. A. (1997). Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of voicing-cue discrimination: Laterality patterns and development. Brain and Language, 57(1), 122–150.
  • Smith, E. E. (1968). Choice reaction time: An analysis of the major theoretical positions. Psychological Bulletin, 69(2), 77.
  • Sparks, R., & Geschwind, N. (1968). Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex, 4(1), 3–16.
  • Speaks, C., Bauer, K., & Carlstrom, J. (1983). Peripheral hearing lossimplications for clinical dichotic listening tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48(2), 135–139.
  • Speaks, C., Blecha, M., & Schilling, M. (1980). Contributions of monotic intelligibility to dichotic performance. Ear and Hearing, 1(5), 259–266.
  • Speaks, C., Niccum, N., & Carney, E. (1982). Statistical properties of responses to dichotic listening with CV nonsense syllables. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(4), 1185–1194.
  • Speaks, C., Niccum, N., Carney, E., & Johnson, C. (1981). Stimulus dominance in dichotic listening. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(3), 430–437.
  • Specht, K. (2014). Neuronal basis of speech comprehension. Hearing Research, 307, 121–135.
  • Springer, S. P., & Searleman, A. (1978). The ontogeny of hemispheric specialization: Evidence from dichotic listening in twins. Neuropsychologia, 16(3), 269–281.
  • Steinmann, S., Leicht, G., Ertl, M., Andreou, C., Polomac, N., Westerhausen, R., … Mulert, C. (2014). Conscious auditory perception related to long-range synchrony of gamma oscillations. Neuroimage, 100, 435–443.
  • Strauss, E., Gaddes, W. H., & Wada, J. (1987). Performance on a free-recall verbal dichotic listening task and cerebral dominance determined by the carotid amytal test. Neuropsychologia, 25(5), 747–753.
  • Strouse Carter, A., & Wilson, H.R. (2001). Lexical effects on dichotic word recognition in young and elderly listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12(2), 86–100.
  • Studdert-Kennedy, M., Shankweiler, D., & Schulman, S. (1970). Opposed effects of a delayed channel on perception of dichotically and monotically presented CV syllables. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 48(2B), 599–602.
  • Takio, F., Koivisto, M., Jokiranta, L., Rashid, F., Kallio, J., Tuominen, T., … Hamalainen, H. (2009). The effect of age on attentional modulation in dichotic listening. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34(3), 225–239. doi: 10.1080/87565640902805669
  • Tallus, J., Hugdahl, K., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., & Hämäläinen, H. (2007). Interaural intensity difference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant–vowel syllable pairs. Brain Research, 1185, 195–200.
  • Tanaka, S., Kanzaki, R., Yoshibayashi, M., Kamiya, T., & Sugishita, M. (1999). Dichotic listening in patients with situs inversus: Brain asymmetry and situs asymmetry. Neuropsychologia, 37(7), 869–874.
  • Techentin, C., & Voyer, D. (2011). Word frequency, familiarity, and laterality effects in a dichotic listening task. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 16(3), 313–332.
  • Teng, E. L. (1981). Dichotic ear difference is a poor index for the functional asymmetry between the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 19(2), 235–240.
  • Tervaniemi, M., & Hugdahl, K. (2003). Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Research Reviews, 43(3), 231–246. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.08.004
  • Van den Noort, M., Specht, K., Rimol, L. M., Ersland, L., & Hugdahl, K. (2008). A new verbal reports fMRI dichotic listening paradigm for studies of hemispheric asymmetry. Neuroimage, 40(2), 902–911.
  • Van der Haegen, L., & Brysbaert, M. (2018). The relationship between behavioral language laterality, face laterality and language performance in left-handers. PloS one, 13(12), e0208696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208696
  • Van der Haegen, L., Westerhausen, R., Hugdahl, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Speech dominance is a better predictor of functional brain asymmetry than handedness: A combined fMRI word generation and behavioral dichotic listening study. Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 91–97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.002
  • Van Eyken, E., Van Camp, G., & Van Laer, L. (2007). The complexity of age-related hearing impairment: Contributing environmental and genetic factors. Audiology & Neurotology, 12(6), 345–358.
  • Voyer, D. (1998). On the reliability and validity of noninvasive laterality measures. Brain & Cognition, 36(2), 209–236.
  • Voyer, D., Dempsey, D., & Harding, J. A. (2014). Response procedure, memory, and dichotic emotion recognition. Brain & Cognition, 85, 180–190.
  • Voyer, D., & Techentin, C. (2009). Dichotic listening with consonant–vowel pairs: The role of place of articulation and stimulus dominance. Journal of Phonetics, 37(2), 162–172.
  • Westerhausen, R., Bless, J. J., & Kompus, K. (2015a). Behavioral laterality and aging: The free-recall dichotic-listening right-ear advantage increases with age. Developmental Neuropsychology, 40(5), 313–327.
  • Westerhausen, R., Bless, J. J., Passow, S., Kompus, K., & Hugdahl, K. (2015b). Cognitive control of speech perception across the lifespan: A large-scale cross-sectional dichotic listening study. Developmental Psychology, 51(6), 806–815.
  • Westerhausen, R., Helland, T., Ofte, S., & Hugdahl, K. (2010). A longitudinal study of the effect of voicing on the dichotic listening ear advantage in boys and girls at age 5 to 8. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(6), 752–761.
  • Westerhausen, R., & Kompus, K. (2018). How to get a left-ear advantage: A technical review of assessing brain asymmetry with dichotic listening. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(1), 66–73.
  • Westerhausen, R., Kompus, K., & Hugdahl, K. J. (2014a). Mapping hemispheric symmetries, relative asymmetries, and absolute asymmetries underlying the auditory laterality effect. Neuroimage, 84, 962–970.
  • Westerhausen, R., Kompus, K., Passow, S., & Hugdahl, K. (2014b). Repetition suppression in dichotic listening: The basis of negative priming? Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference European Society for Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Dortmund, Germany.
  • Westerhausen, R., Moosmann, M., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., Hämäläinen, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2009). Top–down and bottom–up interaction: Manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage. Brain Research, 1250, 183–189.
  • Westerhausen, R., Passow, S., & Kompus, K. (2013). Reactive cognitive-control processes in free-report consonant–vowel dichotic listening. Brain and Cognition, 83(3), 288–296.
  • Westerhausen, R., Põldver, N., Naar, R., Radziun, D., Kaarep, M. S., Kreegipuu, K., … Kompus, K. (2018). Effect of voicing on perceptual auditory laterality in Estonian and Norwegian native speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(2), 259–273.
  • Westerhausen, R., Woerner, W., Kreuder, F., Schweiger, E., Hugdahl, K., & Wittling, W. (2006). The role of the corpus callosum in dichotic listening: A combined morphological and diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuropsychology, 20(3), 272–279.
  • Wexler, B. E. (1988). Dichotic presentation as a method for single hemisphere stimulation studies. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods, and research (pp. 85–115). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
  • Wexler, B. E., & Halwes, T. (1983). Increasing the power of dichotic methods: The fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia, 21(1), 59–66.
  • Wexler, B. E., & Halwes, T. (1985). Dichotic listening tests in studying brain-behavior relationships. Neuropsychologia, 23(4), 545–559.
  • Wexler, B. E., Halwes, T., & Heninger, G. R. (1981). Use of a statistical significance criterion in drawing inferences about hemispheric dominance for language function from dichotic listening data. Brain and Language, 13(1), 13–18.
  • Wexler, B. E., & King, G. P. (1990). Within-modal and cross-modal consistency in the direction and magnitude of perceptual asymmetry. Neuropsychologia, 28(1), 71–80.
  • Wood, S., Hiscock, M., & Widrig, M. (2000). Selective attention fails to alter the dichotic listening lag effect: Evidence that the lag effect is preattentional. Brain and Language, 71(3), 373–390.
  • Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Gordon, J. F. (1974). The effect of memory load on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain and Language, 1(4), 375–381.
  • Zaidel, E. (1983). Disconnection syndrome as a model for laterality effects in the normal brain. In J. P. Hellige (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory, and application (pp. 95–151). New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Zatorre, R. J. (1989). Perceptual asymmetry on the dichotic fused words test and cerebral speech lateralization determined by the carotid sodium amytal test. Neuropsychologia, 27(10), 1207–1219.