Right visual field advantage for lexical decision dependent on stimulus size and visibility: Evidence for an early processing account of hemispheric asymmetry

References

• Appelbaum, L. G., Liotti, M., Perez, R., III, Fox, S. P., & Woldorff, M.G. (2009). The temporal dynamics of implicit processing of non-letter, letter, and word-forms in the human visual cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batt, V., Underwood, G., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Inspecting asymmetric presentations of words differing in informational and morphemic structure. Brain and Language, 49(3), 202–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. J., & Chiarello, C. (1998). Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(1), 2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, V. J. (2006). The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 11(4), 373–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, G. J., Hicks, R. E., & Rose, B. (1979). Lexical discrimination and letter-string identification in the two visual fields. Brain and Language, 8, 10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M., Hutzler, F., Ziegler, J. C., Dambacher, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 30(7), 1977–1989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, G. G., & Kinsbourne, M. (1972). Visual persistence as measured by reaction time. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24(3), 318–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryden, M. (1982). Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M. (1994). Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 64(1–2), 151–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 41(4), 977–990.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and the optimal viewing position effect: On the relation between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10(3), 385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C., Senehi, J., & Soulier, M. (1986). Viewing conditions and hemisphere asymmetry for the lexical decision. Neuropsychologia, 24(4), 521–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. (1989). Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research. Brain and Cognition, 11(2), 238–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, R., Joordens, S., & Meltzer, J. A. (2020). Interhemispheric transfer of semantic information facilitates bilateral word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(5), 984–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12(4), 335–359.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497–505.
   Google Scholar
• Corballis, P. M., Frendrich, R., Shapley, R., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1999). Illusory contours and amodal completion: Evidence for a functional dissociation in callosotomy patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, P. M., Funnell, M. G., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1999). A dissociation between spatial and identity matching in callosotomy patients. Neuroreport, 10, 2183–2187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, P. M., Funnell, M. G., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetries for simple visual judgments in the split brain. Neuropsychologia, 40(4), 401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corballis, M. C., & Sergent, J. (1988). Imagery in a commissurotomized patient. Neuropsychologia, 26, 13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deason, R. G., & Marsolek, C. J. (2005). A critical boundary to the left-hemisphere advantage in visual-word processing. Brain and Language, 92(3), 251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012). How does the brain solve visual object recognition?. Neuron, 73(3), 415–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, D. S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2014). Hemispheric differences in orthographic and semantic processing as revealed by event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 64, 230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(1), 75–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., Yantis, S., & Dechief, L. D. (2000). Response latencies to the onset and offset of visual stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 218–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis, A. W. (2004). Length, formats, neighbors, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation. Brain and Language, 88, 355–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., Ansorge, L., & Lavidor, M. (2007). Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: The effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Language, 103(3), 292–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, B. A., Corballis, P. M., & Corballis, M. C. (2000). Effect of luminance on successiveness discrimination in the absence of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychologia, 38, 441–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funnell, M. G., Corballis, P. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1999). A deficit in perceptual matching in the left hemisphere of a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1143–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 123(7), 1293–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. S., & Smylie, C. S. (1983). Facial recognition and brain asymmetries: Clues to underlying mechanisms. Annals of Neurology, 13, 536–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad-Gutnick, S., Yovel, G., & Sinha, P. (2012). Recognizing degraded faces: The contribution of configural and featural cues. Perception, 41(12), 1497–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, K. M., & McKeever, W. F. (1974). Word length and exposure time effects on the recognition of bilaterally presented words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4(3), 173–175.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., & Perea, M. (2014). Decomposing encoding and decisional components in visual- word recognition: A diffusion model analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(12), 2455–2466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007). A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 389–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellige, J. B. (1989). Visual laterality and hemisphere specialization: Methodological and theoretical considerations.. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.), Conditioning, cognition, and methodology: Contemporary issues in experimental psychology (pp. 153–173). New York: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iaccino, J. (1993). Left brain-right brain differences: Inquiries, evidence, and new approaches. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Milner, A. D. (1998). Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: Implications for studying cerebral asymmetry. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51A(2), 371–391.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., & Milner, A. D. (2000). Lateralized word recognition: Assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access, and perceptual asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1192–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, A. K., Arend, I., Ward, R., Norton, J., & Wathan, J. (2007). Hemispheric asymmetries in feature integration during visual word recognition. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 12(6), 543–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, A. K., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2003). Cortical representation of the fovea: Implications for visual half-field research. Cortex, 39, 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKavey, W., Curcio, F., & Rosen, J. (1975). Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation. Neuropsychologia, 13(1), 27–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsolek, C. J., Kosslyn, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Form-specific visual priming in the right cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 492–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 105–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., Shillcock, R., & McDonald, S. (2004). Hemispheric asymmetries in the split- fovea model of semantic processing. Brain and Language, 88(3), 339–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch, M. (1979). Information processing in the cerebral hemispheres. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Neurobiology. Vol. 2. Neuropsychology (pp. 379–446). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Nemrodov, D., Harpaz, Y., Javitt, D. C., & Lavidor, M. (2011). ERP evidence of hemispheric independence in visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 118(3), 72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994). Word recognition in the human inferior termporal lobe. Nature, 372(6503), 260–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegna, A. J., Khateb, A., Michel, C. M., & Landis, T. (2004). Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: Where and when it occurs. Human Brain Mapping, 22(4), 300–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Gómez, P., & Fraga, I. (2010). Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: A test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 369–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pring, T. R. (1981). The effect of stimulus size and exposure duration on visual-field asymmetries. Cortex, 17, 227–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racheva, K., & Vassilar, A. (2008). Sensitivity to stimulus onset and offset in the S-cone pathway. Vision Research, 48(9), 1125–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88, 552–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111(1), 159–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (2000). A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(1), 127–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. E., & Ross, S. M. (1980). Saccade latency and warning signals: Stimulus onset, offset, and change as a warning of events. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 251–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudell, A. P., & Hua, J. (1995). Recognition potential latency and word image degradation. Brain and Language, 51(2), 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, B. J., & Mathesius, J. R. (2012). The brain’s hemispheres and controlled search of the lexicon: Evidence from fixated words and pseudowords. Brain and Cognition, 79(3), 188–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergent, J. (1982a). Influence of luminance on hemispheric processing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(4), 221–223.
   Google Scholar
• Sergent, J. (1982b). Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 31(5), 451–461.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sergent, J. (1983). Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. Psychological Bulletin, 93(3), 481–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shillcock, R., Ellison, T. M., & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review, 107(4), 824–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, P. (2002). Recognizing complex patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5(Suppl), 1093–1097.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slowiaczek, L. M., & Kahan, T. A. (2014). Evidence for the automatic processing of prelexical codes in an orthographic but not a phonological task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1607–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Haegen, L., Brysbaert, M., & Davis, C. J. (2009). How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory. Brain and Language, 108(2), 112–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A(3), 631–650.
   Google Scholar
• Weems, S. A., & Zaidel, E.. (2005). The effect of response mode on lateralized lexical decision performance. Neuropsychologia, 43(3), 386–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatte, D., Curran, T., & O’Reilly, R. (2012). The limits of feedforward vision: Recurrent processing promotes robust object recognition when objects are degraded. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(11), 2248–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. W. (1982). Methodological theoretical bases. In J. G. Beaumont (Ed.), Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation (pp. 11–27). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar