Predicting interactions in handedness research: The role of integrated versus independent dual-processes

References

• Babiloni, C., Vecchio, F., Cappa, S., Pasqualetti, P., Rossi, S., Miniussi, C., & Rossini, P. M. (2006). Functional frontoparietal connectivity during encoding and retrieval processes follows HERA model: A high-resolution study. Brain Research Bulletin, 68, 203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, M. J., Lyle, K. B., & Winterich, K. P. (2015). When deal depth doesn’t matter: How handedness influences consumer response to horizontal versus vertical price comparison. Marketing Letters, 26, 213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, C., & Jasper, J. D. (2018). Degree of handedness: A unique individual differences factor for predicting and understanding hindsight bias. Personality & Individual Differences, 125, 97–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi, M., Ambrosini, E., & Vallesi, A. (2017). Individual differences in verbal and spatial Stroop tasks: Interactive role of handedness and domain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D. (1993). Handedness in musicians: Bimanual constraints on performance. Brain and Cognition, 22, 266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D. (2001). Individual differences in Stroop and local-global processing: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 45, 97–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D. (2013). Handedness and ‘earedness’: Strong right-handers are less likely to prefer obscure musical genres. Psychology of Music, 41, 89–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Bentle, M., & Niebauer, C. L. (2007a). Handedness differences in body image distortion and eating disorder symptomatology. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., & Butler, M. (2011). Mixed-handedness advantages in episodic memory obtained under conditions of intentional learning extend to incidental learning. Brain and Cognition, 77, 17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Garvey, K. J., Propper, R. E., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2003). Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories. Neuropsychology, 17, 221–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Henning, B. R., Geers, A. L., Propper, R. E., & Niebauer, C. L. (2008). Mixed -handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality, 13(5), 403–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., & Jasper, J. D. (2014). “All-or-none” versus “most-or-some” Asian disease scenarios: Effects of meta-frame and handedness. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 378–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Jasper, J. D., Sontam, V., & Cooil, B. (2007). Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 63, 51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Brown, T. J. (2006). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia. Neuropsychology, 20, 336–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Propper, R. E., & Dion, A. (2004). Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 56, 313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. D., Sontam, V., & Jasper, J. D. (2009). Individual differences in ambiguous figure perception: Degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Perception, 38, 1183–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Christman, S. D., & Baker, J. (2013). Facial attractiveness and averageness: Individual differences in perceived attractiveness reflect degree of access to right hemisphere processing. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• *Christman, S. D., Geers, A. L., Kosbab, K., & Weiland, P. E. (2006). Placebos and belief updating: Strong right-handers do not show placebo effects. In Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• *Christman, S. D., & Sterling, M. (2009). Individual differences in person perception: Mixed-handers have better memory for counter-stereotypical information. In Presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, O., Abeare, C. A., & Bondy, M. A. (2012). Inconsistent vs consistent right-handers' performance on an episodic memory task: Evidence from the California Verbal Learning Test. Laterality, 17(3), 306–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2007). The 33rd Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1041–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. J. (2000). Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: Brain mechanisms and plasticity. American Psychologist, 55, 1193–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlin, J. M., & Carris, E. K. (2013). Memory for hand use depends on consistency of handedness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The split brain revisited. Scientific American, 279, 50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, R., Nyberg, L., & Tulving, E. (2003). Hemispheric asymmetries of memory: The HERA model revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie, S. M, & Wright, L. (2014). Differences between left-and right-handers in approach/avoidance motivation: Influence of consistency of handedness measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellige, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What’s right and what’s left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2005). A neuropsychological dimension for anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 343–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. D., Fournier, C., & Christman, S. D. (2014). Handedness differences in information framing. Brain and Cognition, 84, 85–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. D., Prothero, M., & Christman, S. D. (2009). I’m not sexist!!! cognitive dissonance and the differing cries of mixed- and strong-handers. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 268–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. D., & Woolf, J., & Christman, S. D. (2014). Responding to framed health messages: Different strokes for different (handedness) folks. Psychology and Health, 29, 671–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jasper, J. D., & Clarkson, E. (2020). Degree of handedness (a proxy for interhemispheric interaction) interacts with religiosity to predict responses to moral dilemmas. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Christman, S. D. (2009). Inconsistent handedness is linked to more successful foreign language vocabularyl earning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 480–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanning, M. D., Christman, S. D., & Fugget, A. (in press). Social comparison and handedness: Mixed handers are less susceptible to egocentric biases in judgments about others’ performance. Personality and Individual Differences.
   Google Scholar
• Lansky, L. M., Feinstein, H., & Peterson, J. M. (1988). Demography of handedness in two samples of randomly selected adults (N = 2083). Neuropsychologia, 26(3), 465–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew, S. X., Howe, P. D. L., & Little, D. R. (2016). The appropriacy of averaging in the study of context effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1639–1646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luders, E., Cherbuin, N., Thompson, P. M., Gutman, B., Anstey, K. J., Sachdev, P., & Toga, A. W. (2010). When more is less: Associations between corpus callosum size and handedness lateralization. NeuroImage, 52, 43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, K. B., Hanaver-Torrez, S. D., Hacklander, R. P., & Edlin, J. M. (2012). Consistency of handedness, regardless of direction, predicts baseline memory accuracy, and potential for memory enhancement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, K. B., Mccabe, D. P., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: Evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tasks. Neuropsychology, 22, 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, K. B., & Orsborn, A. E. (2011). Inconsistent handedness and saccade execution benefit face memory without affecting interhemispheric interaction. Memory (Hove, England), 19, 613–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsolek, C. J., & Burgund, D. E. (2008). Dissociable neural subsystems underlie visual working memory for abstract categories and specific exemplars. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. B., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Young, L., King, D., Paggi, A., Fabri, M., … Gazzaniga, M. S. (2010). Abnormal moral reasoning in complete and partial callosotomy patients. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2215–2220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niebauer, C. L., Aselage, J., & Schutte, C. (2002). Interhemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality, 7, 85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A., & Dagnall, N. (2010). Effects of handedness and saccadic bilateral eye movements on components of autobiographical recollection. Brain & Cognition, 73(2), 93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuss, N., Kalla, R., Müri, R., & Mast, F. W. (2017). Framing susceptibility in a risky choice game is altered by galvanic vestibular stimulation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 2947.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prichard, E. C., & Christman, S. D. (2016). Need for cognition moderates paranormal beliefs in inconsistent-handers. Laterality, 21, 228–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard, E. C., & Christman, S. D. (2017). Inconsistent-handed advantage in episodic memory extends to paragraph-level materials. Memory (Hove, England), 25, 1063–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard, E., Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2013). Degree of handedness, but not direction, is a systematic predictor of cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propper, R. E., & Christman, S. D. (2004). Mixed- versus strong-handedness is associated with biases toward ‘remember’ versus ‘know’ judgments in recognition memory: Role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory (Hove, England), 12, 707–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propper, E. R., Christman, S. D., & Phaneuf, K. A. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 751–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propper, R. E., Pierce, J., Geisler, M. W., Christman, S. D., & Bellorado, N. (2012). Hemispheric asymmetry in frontal EEG: Inconsistent-right-handers are more right hemisphere active. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 1, 86–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 22–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. P., Jasper, J. D., & Corser, R. (2012). Interhemispheric interaction and egocentrism: The role of handedness in social comparative judgement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 111–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. P., & Nagel, B. (2013). Relation between comparative risk, absolute risk, and worry: The role of handedness strength. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 866–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer, F. (1997). Affect changes observed with right versus left lateral visual field stimulation in psychotherapy patients: Possible physiological, psychological, and therapeutic implications. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 38, 289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sontam, V., & Christman, S. D. (2012). Semantic organization and handedness: Mixed-handedness is associated with more diffuse activation of ambiguous word associates. Laterality, 17, 38–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperry, R. W. (1974). Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. In F. G. Worden (Ed.), Neurosciences: Third study Program (pp. 5–19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J. M. (2012). Framing effects: The influence of handedness and access to right hemisphere processing. Laterality, 17(1), 98–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekely, R. D., Opre, A., & Miu, A. C. (2015). Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 104–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., Kapur, S., Craik, F. I., Moscovitch, M., & Houle, S. (1994). Hemispheric encoding/retrieval encoding asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings from the National Academy of Science, USA, 91, 2016–2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westfall, J., Jasper, J. D., & Christman, S. D. (2012). Inaction inertia, the sunk cost effect, and handedness: Avoiding the losses of past decisions. Brain and Cognition, 80, 192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2011, October 11). Do southpaws rule the world? Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204524604576608974058291838
   Google Scholar
• Witelson, S. F., & Goldsmith, C. H. (1991). The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Research, 545, 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., Zuo, X.-N., Wang, D., Wang, J., Zhu, C., Milham, M. P., … Zang, Y. (2009). Hemispheric asymmetry in cognitive division of anterior cingulate cortex: A resting-state functional connectivity study. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1579–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(20), 8235–8240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar