On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect

References

• Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18(4–5), 491–498.
   Google Scholar
• Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (1995). Reading habits and line bisection: A developmental approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00018-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chokron, S., & Imbert, M. (1993). Influence of reading habits on line bisection. Cognitive Brain Research, 1(4), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(93)90005-P
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dellatolas, G., Vanluchene, J., & Coutin, T. (1996). Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: An investigation in normal adults. Cognitive Brain Research, 4(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(96)00019-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein, E. (1979). Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5(2), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410050210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, M., & Rorden, C. (2003). Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learmonth, G., Gallagher, A., Gibson, J., Thut, G., & Harvey, M. (2015). Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in pseudoneglect. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0138379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luh, K. E. (1995). Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology, 9(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.9.4.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1990). Line bisection in a case of visual neglect: Psychophysical studies with implications for theory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299008253438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E. (2001). Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 39(10), 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00044-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., Freeman, P., Tahmahkera-Stevens, C., & Chaussee, M. (2001). The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude. Brain and Cognition, 45(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Garlinghouse, M. (2000). Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: Pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex, 36(5), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70548-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., Garlinghouse, M., & Slater, J. (2000). Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection focusing attention on two hypotheses. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, D58–D71. https://doi.org/10.2741/A496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37(7), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00140-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt, M. E., & Olafson, C. (1997). Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 35(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00143-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, R. D. (2006). The eyes have it: Oculomotor exploration and line bisection in neglect. Cortex, 42(5), 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70406-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, R. D. (2018). The end of the line: Antagonistic attentional weightings in unilateral neglect. Cortex, 107, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, R. D., Brown, B. M. A., & Young, L. (2019). Meta-analysis of the visuospatial aftereffects of prism adaptation, with two novel experiments. Cortex, 111, 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, R. D., Ietswaart, M., & Milner, A. D. (2017). Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length. Neuropsychologia, 106, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, R. D., Schindler, I., Birchall, D., & Milner, A. D. (2005). Weights and measures: A new look at bisection behaviour in neglect. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milner, A. D., Brechmann, M., & Pagliarini, L. (1992). To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(92)90055-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. G., Harris, J. M., Benstock, S. E., & Ales, J. M. (2020). The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent. Neuropsychologia, 148, 107618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
   Google Scholar
• Muayqil, T. A., Al-Yousef, L. M., Al-Herbish, M. J., Al-Nafisah, M., Halawani, L. M., Al-Bader, S. S., … Alanazy, M. H. (2021). Culturally influenced performance on tasks of line bisection and symbol cancellation in arabs. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1627359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, M. E., & Roberts, G. R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?. Cortex, 38(2), 113–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, A. J., Woodhead, Z. V. J., Thompson, P. A., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2021). Assessing the reliability of an online behavioural laterality battery: A pre-registered study. Laterality, 26(4), 359–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2020.1859526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, L., Di Luca, S., Henik, A., & Girelli, L. (2014). Reading direction shifts visuospatial attention: An interactive account of attentional biases. Acta Psychologica, 151, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. H. (1993). The relationship between lateralised and non-lateralised attentional deficits in unilateral neglect. In Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies (pp. 257–275). Hove (UK), Hillsdale (USA): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, M. (2021). When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: A consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing. Synthese, 199(3–4), 10969–11000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03276-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkenberg, T., Bradford, D. C., & Ajax, E. T. (1980). Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology, 30(5), 509–509. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.30.5.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2012). Central fixations with rightward deviations: Saccadic eye movements on the landmark task. Experimental Brain Research, 220(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3113-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnava, A., Dervinis, M., & Chambers, C. D. (2013). The predictive nature of pseudoneglect for visual neglect: Evidence from parietal theta burst stimulation. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e65851. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale, J. F. (2014). Edinburgh handedness inventory – Short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 19(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2013.783045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar