233
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Towards more efficient student course evaluations for use at management level

&
Pages 72-83 | Received 11 Sep 2013, Accepted 03 Jan 2014, Published online: 14 Feb 2014

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scale and data analysis. Quality Progress, 40, 64–65.
  • Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education – An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Devore, J. L. (2012). Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences (8th ed., international edition). Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
  • ENQA. (2005). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.
  • George, J., & Cowan, J. (1999). A handbook of techniques for formative evaluation. London: Kogan Page.
  • Gravestock, P., Greenleaf, E., & Boggs, A. M. (2009). The validity of student course evaluations: An eternal debate? In A. Wright, M. Wilson, & D. MacIsaac (Eds.), Collected essays on learning and teaching – A world of learning (Vol. 2, pp. 152–158). Hamilton, ON: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Retrieved from http://apps.medialab.uwindsor.ca/ctl/CELT/vol2/CELT-Vol2.pdf
  • Gravestock, P., & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student course evaluations: Research, models and trends. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
  • Hanken, I. M. (2011). Student evaluation of teaching from the actors’ perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 17, 245–256.
  • Kjærsdam, F., & Enemark, S. (1994). The Aalborg experiment – Project innovation in university education. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
  • Kleijnen, J., Dolmans, D., Willems, J., & Van Hout, H. (2013). Teachers’ conceptions of quality and organisational values in higher education: Compliance or enhancement? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 152–166.
  • Kolmos, A., Fink, F., & Krogh, L. (2004). The Aalborg model – Problem-based and project-organized learning. In A. Kolmos, F. Fink, & L. Krogh (Eds.), The Aalborg PBL model – Progress, diversity and challenges (pp. 9–18). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
  • Ministry of Science, Development and Higher Education. (2007). Act on the accreditation agency for higher education (Act no. 294 of 27 March 2007). Retrieved May 23, 2013, from http://acedenmark.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumenter/Engelske_tekster/Engelsk_oversaettelse_af_Akkrediteringsloven.pdf
  • Ministry of Science, Development and Higher Education. (2009). Ministerial order on criteria for the relevance and quality of university study programmes and on procedures for approval of university study programmes (Order no. 1402 of 14 December 2009). Retrieved May 23, 2013, from http://acedenmark.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumenter/Engelske_tekster/The_Accreditation_Order.pdf
  • Moldt, C. (2007). From meaningless to meaningful evaluation. Økonomistyring og Informatik, 23, 437–467 [in Danish].
  • Qvist, P. (2005). Formative evaluation. IPN Skriftserie, No. 4, Ingeniørernes pædagogiske netværk [in Danish].
  • Rantanen, P. (2013). The number of feedbacks needed for reliable evaluation: A multilevel analysis of the reliability, stability and generalisability of students’ evaluation of teaching. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 224–239.
  • Rønsholdt, B. (2004). Semester planning in a problem-based learning environment – Coherence between semester components and undergraduate programme. In A. Kolmos, F. Fink, & L. Krogh (Eds.), The Aalborg PBL model – Progress, diversity and challenges (pp. 247–255). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
  • Taut, S., & Brauns, D. (2003). Resistance to evaluation: A psychological perspective. Evaluation, 9, 247–264.
  • Van Oudheusden, D., & Peperstraete, J. (1999). Quality assessment by students: The case of a postgraduate engineering programme. European Journal of Engineering Education, 24, 15–22.
  • Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.