Do men and women perform academic work differently?

References

• Ackers, S. (Ed.). (1989). Teacher, gender and careers. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, N. J. (1984). Women do not want international careers: And other myths about international management. Organizational Dynamics, 13, 66–79.10.1016/0090-2616(84)90019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45, 177–192.10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015694.14358.ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, B., & Goode, J. (2001). The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 8, 161–180.10.1177/135050680100800203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L. (2003). Academic careers and gender equity: Lesson learned from MIT. Gender, Work and Organisation, 10, 137–153.10.1111/gwao.2003.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciples. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benschop, Y., & Brouns, M. (2003). Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work and Organization, 10, 194–212.10.1111/gwao.2003.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M., & La Valle, I. (2000). Who applies for research funding? Key factors shaping funding application behaviour among women and men in British higher education institutions. London: The Wellcome Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Bordons, M., & Mauleón, E. (2006). Women’s research careers and scientific productivity in public research. In OECD Women in scientific careers. Unleashing the potential (pp. 77–85). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22, 716–740.10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P., & Goldzwig, S. (1991). Linear and nonlinear career models: Metaphors, paradigms, and ideologies. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 466–505.10.1177/0893318991004004004
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S. W., & Williams, W. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141.10.1177/1529100614541236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2, 217–258.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Wood, J. (2002). Globalization and scientific labour: Patterns in a life-history study of intellectual workers in the periphery. Journal of Sociology, 38, 167–190.10.1177/144078302128756561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515.10.1126/science.149.3683.510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Ranga, M. (2011). Gender dynamics in science and technology: From the “Leaky Pipeline” to the vanish box. Brussels Economic Review, 54, 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). The gender challenge in research funding: Assessing the european national scenes. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research Science, Economy and Society.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). She figures 2012: Gender in research and innovation. Statistics and indicators. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. (2000). Analysing change in women’s careers: Culture, structure and action dimensions. Gender, Work and Organization, 7, 57–67.10.1111/gwao.2000.7.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people’ gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37, 331–356.10.1177/0306312706072175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradox. Engineering Studies, 1, 169–189.10.1080/19378620903225059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fels, A. (2004, April). Do women lack ambition? Harvard Business Review, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35, 131–150.10.1177/0306312705046630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F., & Xiao, W. (2013). Perceived chances for promotion among women associate professors in computing: Individual, departmental, and entrepreneurial factors. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 135–152.10.1007/s10961-012-9250-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• González Ramos, A. M., Navarrete Cortés, J., & Cabrera Moreno, E. (2015). Dancers in the dark: Scientific careers according to a gender-blind model of promotion. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 40, 182–203.10.1179/0308018815Z.000000000112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J., & Low, L. (1997). Women and peer review: An audit of the wellcome trust’s decision-making on grants. Resource document. PRISM (Report No. 8). 10 November 2012. Retrieved April 4, 2014, from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtd003212.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1998). Is science multi-cultural? Postcolonialism, feminism, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, M., & Chen, J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruistic citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441.10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M., & Wallen, A. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting, L. A. (2003). Intertwined discourses of merit and gender: Evidence from academic employment in the USA. Gender, Work and Organization, 10, 260–278.10.1111/gwao.2003.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M., & Scheerens, J. (2006). Career competencies for the modern career. Journal of Career Development, 32, 303–319.10.1177/0894845305283006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudel, G., & Gläser, J. (2008). From apprentice to colleague: The metamorphosis of early career researchers. Higher Education, 55, 387–406.10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 45–71.10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D., & Woodward, A. E. (2004). Gender and time at the top: Cultural constructions of time in high-level careers and homes. The European Journal of Women's Studies, 11, 205–221.10.1177/1350506804042096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauleón, E., & Bordons, M. (2009). Male and female involvement in patenting activity in Spain. Scientometrics, 30, 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J., Brescoll, V., Graham, M., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479.10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, D., & Bilimoria, D. (2005). Women’s career development phases. Idealism, endurance, and reinvention. Career Development International, 10, 168–189.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, D., Hopkins, M., & Bilimoria, D. (2008). Women’s careers at the start of the 21st century: Patterns and paradoxes. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 727–743.10.1007/s10551-007-9465-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack, I., Peacey, M. W., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review. Nature, 506, 93–96. doi:10.1038/nature12786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, G., & Mainero, L. (1992). Cross-currents in the river of time: Conceptualizing the complexities of women's careers. Journal of Management, 18, 215–237.10.1177/014920639201800202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L. (2001). Has feminism changed science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L. (2008). Gendered innovations in science and engineering. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L., & Schraudner, M. (2011). Interdisciplinary approaches to achieving gendered innovations in science, medicine, and engineering. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36, 154–167.10.1179/030801811X13013181961518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönemann, P. H. (1991). In praise of randomness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 162–163.10.1017/S0140525X00065973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R., Anders, K., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the CVs of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41, 509–528.10.1023/A:1018839203698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2005). Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 343–353.10.1007/s10961-005-2580-6
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2011). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organisation, 19, 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., & Jansen, W. (2010). Transparency in academic recruitment: A problematic tool for gender equality? Organisation Studies, 31, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., & Stobbe, L. (2009). Doing gender in academic education: The paradox of visibility. Gender, Work & Organization, 16, 451–470.10.1111/gwao.2009.16.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K. B., & Grant, L. (1995). Gender and academic publishing. In A. E. Bayer & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 172–212). New York, NY: Agathon.
   Google Scholar
• Wennerås, C., & Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. (2004). The leaking pipeline: Women postgraduate and early career researchers in Australia. Tertiary Education and Management, 10, 227–241.10.1080/13583883.2004.9967129
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2005). Gender and commercial science: Women’s patenting in the life sciences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 355–370.10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2008). Women inventors in context: Disparities in patenting across academia and industry. Gender & Society, 22, 194–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63, 847–870.10.2307/2657505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science. Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar