Navigating the turbulent waters of academia: the leadership role of programme managers

References

• Ash, S., & Clayton, P. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 137–154.10.1023/B:IHIE.0000048795.84634.4a
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, L., Waldman, D., & Brett, J. (2002). Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Human Resource Management, 41, 193–208.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315–338.10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J. (2003). From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential: Creating change intermediaries. British Journal of Management, 14, 69–83.10.1111/bjom.2003.14.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The changing nature of the academic deanship. Leadership, 5, 347–364.10.1177/1742715009337765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, R., Petrov, G., Gosling, J., & Bryman, A. (2009). Leadership in higher education: Facts, fictions and futures – Introduction to the special issue. Leadership, 5, 291–298.10.1177/1742715009337761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, D., Hooijberg, R., & Quinn, R. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organizational Science, 6, 524–540.10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijberg, R. (1992). Behavioral complexity and managerial effectiveness: A new perspective on managerial leadership ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Juntrasook, A., Nairn, K., Bond, C., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2013). Unpacking the narrative of non-positional leadership in academia: Hero and/or victim? Higher Education Research and Development, 32, 201–213.10.1080/07294360.2011.643858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, V., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (Eds.). (2010). The changing dynamics of higher education: Middle-management (Vol. 33). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Middlehurst, R. (2007). A challenging journey: From leadership courses to leadership foundation for higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 137, 45–57.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0741
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative framework. In J. G. Hunt, D. M. Hosking, C. A. Schriessheim, & R. Stewart (Eds.), Leaders and managers: International perspectives on managerial behavior and leadership (pp. 10–27). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363–377.10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, D. (2005). Generative paradox in learner-centered college teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 181–194.10.1007/s10755-005-1935-0
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 37–57.10.1023/A:1010986404527
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson, M. (2008). Learning leaders in times of change: Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T. (2014). Leadership provided by non-academic middle-level managers in the Australian higher education sector: The enablers. Tertiary Education and Management, 20, 320–338. doi:10.1080/13583883.2014.966141
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Cartan, G. (2001). The behavioural control room for managers: The integrator role. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 22, 175–185.10.1108/01437730110395079
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Cartan, G. (2006, December). The factor structure of the Competing Values Framework: The roles managers display and consider important from manager and other’s perspectives. Management: Pragmatism, philosophy, priorities: Proceedings of the 20th ANZAM Conference, Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton.
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Ladyshewsky, R. (2012). Leadership behaviour and effectiveness of academic program directors in Australian universities. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 40, 112–129. doi:10.1177/1741143211420613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & Ladyshewsky, R. (2014). Factors impacting job performance and role attractiveness in Academic Directors and their implications for policy and practice in higher education. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 13, 101–114. doi:10.1007/s10671-013-9153-5
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., Monga, M., Mehta, S., & Cartan, G. (2008). Predictors of leadership effectiveness for Indian managers. Proceedings of the 22nd ANZAM Conference: Management in the Pacific Century, Business School, University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., Shen, J., & Cartan, G. (2009). Predictors of leadership effectiveness for Chinese managers. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30, 577–590.
   Google Scholar
• Vilkinas, T., & West, D. (2011). Leadership behaviour displayed by heads of school – Its extent and importance. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33, 347–361.10.1080/1360080X.2011.585709
   Google Scholar