Shakespeare’s Education and What It Teaches Us

References

• Andrews, R. 2014. A Theory of Contemporary Rhetoric. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2015a. “Foundation to Year 10 Curriculum: English.” https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/english/
   Google Scholar
• ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority). 2015b. “Foundation to Year 10 Curriculum: English (Work Sample Portfolio: Year 9 – Satisfactory).” https://docs.acara.edu.au/curriculum/worksamples/Year_9_English_Portfolio_Satisfactory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bate, J. 2008. Soul of the Age: The Life, Mind and World of William Shakespeare. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. 1997. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bomford, K. 2019. “What are (English) Lessons For?” Changing English 26 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2018.1519370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkman, D. 2010. “Teaching Creatively and Teaching for Creativity.” Arts Education Policy Review 111 (2): 48–50. doi:10.1080/10632910903455785.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2005. Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, P. A. 1875. Romeus and Juliet, Rhomeo and Julietta. London: New Shakespeare Society.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, P. 2004. “Reading Shakespeare: A Narrative Perspective.” English in Australia 141: 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., and M. Williams. 2004. Unlocking Creativity: Teaching across the Curriculum. New York: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fleith, D. 2000. “Teacher and Student Perception of Creativity in the Classroom Environment.” Roeper Review 22 (3): 148–153. doi:10.1080/02783190009554022.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. 2010. “Rethinking Creativity: A Definition to Support Contemporary Practice.” Art Education 63 (2): 8–15. doi:10.1080/00043125.2010.11519056.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, H. 1989. To Open Minds. Cambridge: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. 2017. “English as Rhetoric? – Once More, with Feeling.” English in Australia 52 (1): 74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, S. 1997. The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and L. de Bruin. 2017. “Fostering Creative Ecologies in Australasian Secondary Schools.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 42 (9): 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and L. de Bruin. 2018a. “An International Study of Creative Pedagogies in Practice in Secondary Schools: Towards a Creative Ecology.” Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy 15 (2): 215–235. doi:10.1080/15505170.2018.1457999.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and L. de Bruin. 2018b. “Secondary School Creativity, Teacher Practice and STEAM Education: An International Study.” Journal of Educational Change 19: 153–179. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. 1981. Mikhail Bakhtin’s the Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. 1997. “After English: Towards a Less Critical Literacy.” In Constructing Critical Literacies: Teaching and Learning Textual Practice, edited by S. Muspratt, A. Luke, and P. Freebody, 315–334. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson, B. 2018. Timber, or Discoveries Made upon Men and Matter. Farnkfurt: Outlook Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lassig, C. 2009. “Promoting Creativity in Education – From Policy to Practice: An Australian Perspective.” proceedings from the 7th ACM conference on creativity and cognition: everyday creativity, University of California, Berkeley, 27-30 October.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, I. 2017. “How to Make Things Visible in Your English Classroom and Encourage Deep Learning.” Metaphor 1: 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M., and J. Curwood. 2020. “A Brave New World: Teachers’ Conceptions of the Value of Creativity in the New Stage 6 English Syllabus.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 43 (2): 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstok, S. 2020. How to Think like Shakespeare: Lessons from a Renaissance Education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R., K. Peng, I. Choi, and A. Norenzayan. 2001. “Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic versus Analytic Cognition.” Psychological Review 108 (2): 291–310. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, W., and J. Kaufman. 2013. “Creativity of Chinese and American Cultures: A Synthetic Analysis.” The Journal of Creative Behaviour 47 (1): 77–87. doi:10.1002/jocb.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESA (NSW Education Standards Authority). 2020. “English Standard: Module C: The Craft of Writing.” https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/11-12/stage-6-learning-areas/stage-6-english/english-standard-2017/modules/module-c-the-craft-of-writing
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, A. D. 1983. A New Mimesis: Shakespeare and the Representation of Reality. New York: Methuen &.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. 1968. “Tudor Writings on Rhetoric.” Studies in the Renaissance 15: 39–69. doi:10.2307/2857004.
   Google Scholar
• Powles, L. (dir.) 2016. “Cunk on Shakespeare.” BBC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YeCpHoy9EQ
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, D., M. Kelly, and W. Wong. 1999. “Chinese Conceptions of ‘Effective Teaching’ in Hong Kong: Towards Culturally Sensitive Evaluation of Teaching.” International Journal of Lifelong Education 18 (4): 241–258. doi:10.1080/026013799293739a.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, I. 1984. The Making of Literature: Texts, Contexts and Classroom Practices. Kent Town: Australian Association for the Teaching of English.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. 1979. Critical Assumptions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saebø, A., L. McCammon, and L. O’Farrell. 2007. “Creative Teaching—teaching Creativity.” Caribbean Quarterly 53 (1–2): 205–215. doi:10.1080/00086495.2007.11672318.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenbaum, S. 1986. “The Life of Shakespeare.” In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies, edited by S. Wells, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schupak, E. 2018. “Shakespeare and Performance Pedagogy: Overcoming the Challenges.” Changing English 25 (2): 163–179. doi:10.1080/1358684X.2018.1442209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. 2005. 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2019. This Is Shakespeare: How to Read the World’s Greatest Playwright. London: Pelican Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thurman, T (dir.). 2006. Buy the Ticket, Take the Ride: Hunter S. Thompson on Film. Santa Monica, CA: Starz Original Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, S. 2016. Shakespeare on Page and Stage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., and S. Leahy. 2015. Embedding Formative Assessment. Morabbin: Hawker Brownlow.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1965. The Long Revolution. London: Pelican Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Flamingo.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. 1996. “Cards on the Table: The Creative and the Critical in English.” English in Australia 116: 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, V. 2018. Passionate Apprentice: The Early Journals, 1897-1909. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Yandell, J. 1997. “Reading Shakespeare, or Ways with Will.” Changing English 4 (2): 277–294. doi:10.1080/1358684970040209.
   Google Scholar