Performance of metallic defences submitted to vehicle impact

References

• G. Amato, F. OBrien, B. Ghosh, G. Williams, and C. Simms, A scaling method for modelling the crashworthiness of novel roadside barrier designs. Int. J. Crashworthiness 18 (2013), pp. 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.O. Atahan and O.F. Cansiz, Impact analysis of a vertical flared back bridge rail-to-guardrail transition structure using simulation. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41 (2005), pp. 371–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Brünig, O. Chyra, D. Albrecht, L. Driemeier, and M. Alves, A ductile damage criterion at various stress triaxialities. Int. J. Plasticity 24 (2008), pp. 1731–1755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Çanakci, H.E. Yavuz, F. Çelik, and H. Güllü, Interface friction between organic soil and construction materials. International Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, Tirana, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• L. Driemeier, R.T. Moura, M. Alves, and I.F. Machado, On experimental and numerical aspects of an ad hoc specimen for failure criteria performance analyses. Int. J. Plasticity 71 (2015), pp. 62–86.
   Google Scholar
• K.E. Engstrand, Improvements to the weak-post W-beam guardrail, Master's thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• R.K. Faller, K.A. Polivka, B.D. Kuipers, R.W. Bielenberg, J.R. Reid, J.R. Rohde, and D.L. Sicking, Midwest Guard-rail System for standard and special applications, 83rd Annual Meeting, Paper No. 04-4778, Transportation Research Board (TRB), Washington, DC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• R.K. Faller, D.L. Sicking, R.W. Bielenberg, J.R. Rohde, K.A. Polivka, and J.R. Reid, Performance of steel-post, W- beam guardrail systems. Trans. Res. Record 2025 (2007), pp. 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.C. Gabler, D.J. Gabauer, and V. Tech, Opportunities for reduction of fatalities in vehicle-guardrail collisions. Annu. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Automot. Med. 51 (2007), pp. 31–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R.H. Grzebieta, R. Zou, T. Jiang, and A. Carey, Roadside hazard and barrier crashworthiness issues confronting vehicle and barrier manufactures and government regulators, 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Paper No. 05-0149, Washington, DC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• C.E. Hampton and H.C. Gabler, Crash performance of strong-post W-beam guardrail with missing blockouts. Int. J. Crashworthiness 17 (2012)(1), pp. 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Haug, T. Scharnhorst, and P.D. Bois, Fem-crash berechnung eines fahrzeugfrontalaufpralls. VDI Berichte 613 (1986), pp. 479–505.
   Google Scholar
• P. Karaca-Mandic and J. Lee, Hospitalizations and fatalities in crashes with light trucks. Traffic. Inj. Prev. 15 (2014) (2), pp. 165–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.T. Matsumoto, L. Driemeier, and M. Alves, Performance of polymeric reinforcements in vehicle structures submitted to frontal impact. Int. J. Crashworthiness 17 (2012), pp. 479–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCAC, Finite element model of C2500 pickup truck. Tech. Rep., National Crash Analysis Center, The George Washington University, 2008. Available at http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/archive/ncac/vehicle/c2500pickup-0.7.tgz.
   Google Scholar
• R.R.V. Neves, Performance of road defenses subject to car impact, Master's thesis, University of São Paulo, 2013 ( in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Plaxico.,Design guidelines for the use of curbs and curb/guardrails combinations along high-speed roadways, Ph.D. thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Plaxico, G.S. Patzner, and M.H. Ray, Finite-element modeling of guardrail timber posts and the post-soil interaction. Trans. Res. Record 1647 (1998), pp. 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Plaxico, M.H. Ray, and K. Hiranmayee, Comparison of the impact performance of the G4(1W) and G4(2W) guardrail systems under NCHRP Report 350 Test 3-11 conditions. Trans. Res. Record 1720 (2000), pp. 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• K.A. Polivka, B.A. Coon, D.L. Sicking, R.K. Faller, R.W. Bielenberg, J.R. Rohde, and J.R. Reid, Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) W-beam to thrie-beam transition, 86th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board (TRB), Washington, DC, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• M.H. Ray, C.A. Plaxico, and K.E. Engstrand, Performance of W-beam splices. Trans. Res. Record 1743 (2001), pp. 120–125.
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Reid, B.D. Kuipers, D.L. Sicking, and R.K. Faller, Impact performance of W-beam guardrails installed at various flare rates. Int. J. Impact Eng. 36 (2009), pp. 467–485.
   Google Scholar
• J.D. Reid, D.L. Sicking, R.K. Faller, and B.G. Pfeifer, Development of a new guardrail system. Trans. Res. Record 1599 (1997), pp. 72–80.
   Google Scholar
• H.E. Ross, D.L. Sicking, R.A. Zimmer, and J.D. Michie, Recommended procedures for the safety performance evaluation of highway features. Tech. Rep., National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 350, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• L. Schwer, Optional Strain Rate forms for the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model and the Role of the Parameter Epsilon0. LS-Dyna Anwenderforum, Frankenthal, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• K. Sennah, M. Samaan, and A. Elmarakbi, Impact Performance of Flexible Guardrail Systems Using Ls-dyna. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Crash/Automotive Applications III, Ulm, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• L. Sgambi, Influence of degradation at the base of a support post in a collapse of an old guardrail: A forensic analysis. Eng. Failure Anal. 42 (2014), pp. 284–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Shen, L. Guo, L. Yang, X. Du, and P. Cao, Numerical analysis of impact effect on mechanical behavior of strong guardrail system. J. Phys., Conf. Ser. 96 (2008), 012036.
   Google Scholar
• M. Soltani, T.B. Moghaddam, M.R. Karim, and N.H.R. Sulong, The safety performance of guardrail systems: Review and analysis of crash tests data. Int. J. Crashworthiness 18 (2013)(5), pp. 530–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Sonnenschein, Modelling of Bolts Under Dynamic Loads. LS-Dyna Anwenderforum, Bamberg, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• A. Tabiei and J. Wu, Roadmap for crashworthiness finite element simulation of roadside safety structures. Int. J. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 34 (2000)(2), pp. 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.H. Tan, C.Y. Lee, and T. Sivadass, Behavior of clay-steel interfaces. International Conference on Construction and Building Technology (ICCBT 2008), Kuala Lumpur, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• N. Tanlak, F. Sonmez, and E. Talay, Detailed and simplified models of bolted joints under impact loading. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Design 46 (2011)(3), pp. 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Vesenjak and Z. Ren, Improving the roadside safety with computational simulations. 4th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, Crash/Automotive Applications II, Ulm, 2003, pp. 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• T. Wenzel, The effect of recent trends in vehicle design on U.S. societal fatality risk per vehicle mile traveled, and their projected future relationship with vehicle mass. Accid. Anal. Prev. 56 (2013), pp. 71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Wu and R. Thomson, A study of the interaction between a guardrail post and soil during quasi-static and dynamic loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 34 (2007), pp. 883–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar