Structure-material-performance integration lightweight optimisation design for frontal bumper system

References

• M.F. Ashby. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. Belingardi, A.T. Beyene, and E.G. Koricho. Geometrical optimization of bumper beam profile made of pultruded composite by numerical simulation. Comp. Struct. 102(102), (2014), pp. 217–225.
   Google Scholar
• M.P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng. 71(2), (1988), pp. 197–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.T. Beyene, E.G. Koricho, G. Belingardi, and B. Martorana. Design and manufacturing issues in the development of lightweight solution for a vehicle frontal bumper. Proc. Eng. 88 (2014), pp. 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• F.C. Campbell. Manufacturing Processes for Advanced Composites, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• C.J. Chen and M. Usman. Design optimization for automobile applications. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 25 (2001), pp. 126–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Cheon, H.C. Jin and G.L. Dai. Development of the composite bumper beam for passenger cars. Comp. Struct. 32(1–4), (1995), pp. 491–499.
   Google Scholar
• M.M. Davoodi, S.M. Sapuan, and R. Yunus. Conceptual design of a polymer composite automotive bumper energy absorber. Mater. Des. 29(7), (2008), pp. 1447–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Daynes and P.M. Weaver. Review of shape-morphing automobile structures: Concepts and outlook. P. Inst. Mech. Eng. D. J. Aut. Eng.. 227(11), (2013), pp. 1603–1622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. A. M. T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 6(2), (2002), pp. 182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.L. Edwards. Strategic substitution of new materials for old: Applications in automotive product development. Mater. Des 25(6), (2004), pp. 529–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Fang, M. Rais-Rohani, Z. Liu, and M. F. Horstemeyer . A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput. Struct. 83(25), (2005), pp. 2121–2136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Farkas, D. Moens, S. Donders, and D. Vandepitte, Optimization study of a vehicle bumper subsystem with fuzzy parameters. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 32(4), (2012), pp. 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Fu and E. Abramoski. Robust design for occupant restraint system. No.2005-01-0814, SAE Technical Paper, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• G. Sun, G. Li, S. Zhou, H. Li, S. Hou, and Q. Li, Crashworthiness design of vehicle by using multiobjective robust optimization. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 44(1), (2011), pp. 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hosseinzadeh, M.M. Shokrieh and L.B. Lessard. Parametric study of automotive composite bumper beams subjected to low-velocity impacts. Comp. Struct. 68(4), (2005), pp. 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• T.J. Huang, J.T. Wu, C.Y. Hsiao, M.S. Wang and K.C. Lee Design of a bumper system for pedestrian lower-leg protection using the Taguchi method. P. I. Mech. Eng. D. J. Aut. 225(12), (2011), pp. 1578–1586.
   Google Scholar
• M.F. Hussain, R.R. Barton, and S.B. Joshi. Metamodeling: Radial basis functions, versus polynomials. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(1), (2002), pp. 142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Jin, W. Chen and T.W. Simpson. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modeling criteria. Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim. 23(1), (2001), pp. 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-S. Kim, K.-W. Lee, D.-H. Lee, and H. G. Lee. Bumper system development to meet new IIHS bumper test using CAE and optimization. No. 2009-01-0962, SAE Technical Paper, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R. Koganti and J. Weishaar. Aluminum vehicle body construction and enabling manufacturing technologies. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manufact. 1(1), (2008), pp. 491–502.
   Google Scholar
• M. Langseth and O.S. Hopperstad. Static and dynamic axial crushing of square thin-walled aluminum extrusions. Int. J. Impact Eng. 18(7–8), (1996), pp. 949–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Leiva, B.C. Watson and I. Kosaka. Modern structural optimization concepts applied to topology optimization. Proceedings of the 40th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference and Exhibit, St. Louis, MO, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Liu. Optimum design of straight thin-walled box section beams for crashworthiness analysis. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 44(3), (2008), pp. 139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Liu, J. Lu and P. Zhu. Lightweight design of automotive composite bumper system using modified particle swarm optimizer. Comp. Struct. 140 (2016), pp. 630–643.
   Google Scholar
• J. Marzbanrad, M. Alijanpour, and M.S. Kiasat. Design and analysis of an automotive bumper beam in low-speed frontal crashes. Thin Wall. Struct. 47(8–9), (2009), pp. 902–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Mizuno, K. Wani and H. Yonezawa. Vehicle crashworthiness in full and offset frontal impact tests. JSAE Rev. 24(2), (2003), pp. 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• N.M. Patel, C.L. Penninger, and J.E. Renaud. Topology synthesis of extrusion-based nonlinear transient designs. J. Mech. Des. 131(6), (2009), pp. 061003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Peroni, M. Avalle, and M. Peroni. The mechanical behavior of aluminum foam structures in different loading conditions. Int. J. Impact Eng. 35(7), (2008), pp. 644–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Portela, P. Camanho, P. Weaver, and I. Bond, Analysis of morphing, multi stable structures actuated by piezoelectric patches. Comput. Struct. 86(35), (2008), pp. 347–356.
   Google Scholar
• C.J. Sallaberry, J.C. Helton, and S.C. Hora. Extension of Latin Hypercube samples with correlated variables. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safe. 93(7), (2008), pp. 1047–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M. Sapuan. A computer-aided material selection for design of automotive safety critical components with novel materials. Malaysian J. Comp. Sci. 12(2), (1999), pp. 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• S.M. Sapuan, M.A. Maleque, M. Hameedullah, M. N. Suddin, and N. Ismail, A note on the conceptual design of polymeric composite automotive bumper system. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 159(2), (2005), pp. 145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.K. Shin, S.I. Yi, and O.T. Kwon, Structural optimization of the automobile frontal structure for pedestrian protection and the low-speed impact test. P. I. Mech. Eng. D. J. Aut. 222(12), (2008), pp. 2373–2387.
   Google Scholar
• A.Y.N. Sofla, S.A. Meguid, K.T. Tan, and G.J. Park, Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges. Mater. Des. 31(3), (2010), pp. 1284–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Sun, G. Li, Z. Gong, X. Cui, X. Yang, and Q. Li, Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design in sheet metal forming. Mater. Des. 31(4), (2010), pp. 1917–1929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Sun, G. Li, S. Hou, S. Zhou, W. Li, and Q. Li., Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 527(7), (2010), pp. 1911–1919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Tanlak and F.O. Sonmez. Optimal shape design of thin-walled tubes under high-velocity axial impact loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 84(84), (2014), pp. 302–312.
   Google Scholar
• N. Tanlak, F.O. Sonmez and M. Senaltun. Shape optimization of bumper beams under high-velocity impact loads. Eng. Struct. 95 (2015), pp. 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.Q. Wang, D.F. Wang, and S. Zhang. Design and application of lightweight multi-objective collaborative optimization for a parametric body-in-white structure. Proc.. Inst. Mech. Eng. D. J. Aut. Eng. 230(2), (2016), pp. 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.G. Wang and S. Shan. Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 129(4), (2006), pp. 415–426.
   Google Scholar
• L. Wang, P.K. Basu and J.P. Leiva. Automobile body reinforcement by finite element optimization. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 40(8), (2004), pp. 879–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Wang and Y. Li. Design and analysis of automotive carbon fiber composite bumper beam based on finite element analysis. Adv. Mech. Eng. 7(6), (2015), pp. 222–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Witik, J. Payet, V. Michaud, C. Ludwig, and J. A. E. Manson Assessing the life cycle costs and environmental performance of lightweight materials in automobile applications. Compos. Part A-Appl. S. 42(11), (2011), pp. 1694–1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kawabe, T. Kondo, S. Hirayama, K. Obayashi, and T. Okabe, Multi-parameter, multi-objective optimization of injury indexes of vehicle crash models. No. 2005-01-1302, SAE Technical Paper, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• S. Yang and C. Qi. Multiobjective optimization for empty and foam-filled square columns under oblique impact loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 54(4), (2013), pp. 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• H. Zarei, M. Kröger and H. Albertsen. An experimental and numerical crashworthiness investigation of thermoplastic composite crash boxes. Compos. Struct. 98(3), (2008), pp. 245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Zhang, G. Sun, G. Li, Z. Luo, and Q. Li, Optimization of foam-filled bitubal structures for crashworthiness criteria. Mater. Des. 38 (2012), pp. 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zuo, W. Li, T. Xu, S. Xuan, and J. Na, A complete development process of finite element software for body-in-white structure with semi-rigid beams in. NET framework. Adv. Eng. Software 45(1), (2012), pp. 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar