The biomechanical differences of shock absorption test methods in the US and European helmet standards

References

• Cairns H. Head injuries in motorcyclists: the importance of the crash helmet. Br Med J. 1941;2:465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagel BE, Pless IB, Goulet C, et al. Effectiveness of helmets in skiers and snowboarders: case-control and case crossover study. BMJ. 2005;330:281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh AS, Andersen TE, Bahr R, et al. Sports helmets now and in the future. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:1258–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorli JM. Equestrian injuries: a five year review of hospital admissions in British Columbia, Canada. Inj Prev. 2000;6:59–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson DC, Rivara FP, Thompson RS. Effectiveness of bicycle safety helmets in preventing head injuries: a case-control study, JAMA. 1996;276:1968–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOT FMVSS 218. Laboratory procedure for motorcycle helmet testing -federal motor vehicle safety standard no. 218, 1984. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Occupant crash protection–head injury criterion. Washington, D.C. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: NHTSA.(S6. 2 of FMVSS 571.208); 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Versace J. A review of the severity index. In: Proceedings of the 15th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers; 1971, 771–796.
   Google Scholar
• Connor TA, Meng S, Zouzias D, et al. Current standards for sports and automotive helmets: a review. Ref. Ares 3151745; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Thom DR, Hurt Jr Jr HH, Smith TA. Motorcycle helmet test headform and test apparatus comparison. In: Proceedings of the 16th ESV Conference. 31. Windsor, Canada; 1998, 2310–2322.
   Google Scholar
• Thom DR, Hurt Jr Jr HH, Smith TA, et al. Feasibility study of upgrading fmvss no. 218, motorcycle helmets. Head Protection Research Laboratory, University of Southern California, Final Report; 1997, LA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Becker EB. Voluntary and mandatory motorcycle helmet standards, In: Proceedings of the 9th International Motorcycle Conference., Cologne, Germany; 2012, 424–439.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner Jr H, Thomas D, Gennarelli T, et al. HIC Workshop: final report of workshop on criteria for head injury and helmet standards. 2005, Wisconsin, USA (Library of Congress Control Number: 2006922792).
   Google Scholar
• Mellor A, StClair V, Chinn B. Motorcyclists’ helmets and visors: test methods and new technologies. Wokingham: TRL Limited (UK); 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ommaya A. Head and neck injury criteria: a consensus workshop. Washington (DC): US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Holbourn A. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet. 1943;242:438–441.
   Google Scholar
• Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Adams JH, et al. Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann Neurol. 1982;12:564–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiven S. Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int J Crashworthiness. 2006;11:65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulies SS, Thibault LE. An analytical model of traumatic diffuse brain injury. J Biomech Eng. 1989;111:241–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Margulies SS, Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA. Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate, J Biomech. 1990;23:823–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ommaya AK, Gennarelli T. Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Brain. 1974;97:633–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ommaya AK, Hirsch A, Flamm E, et al. Cerebral concussion in the monkey: an experimental model. Science. 1966;153:211–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiven S. Why most traumatic brain injuries are not caused by linear acceleration but skull fractures are. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2013;1:15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gennarelli TA, Crandall J. IRCOBI-NOCSAE-PDB-SNELL workshop: the state of biomechanics of angular head motions 2015. Lyon, France; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hoshizaki TB, Brien SE. The science and design of head protection in sport. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:956–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman JA. Yoganandan N, Nahum AM, Melvin JW. Design and testing of sports helmets: biomechanical and practical considerations, editors. Accidental injury: biomechanics and prevention. New York (NY): Springer; 2015. p. 755–768.
   Google Scholar
• Ommaya AK, Thibault L, Bandak FA. Mechanisms of impact head injury. Int J Impact Eng. 1994;15:535–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA, Margulies SS, et al. The strain dependent pathophysiological consequences of inertial loading on central nervous system tissue. In: International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts; Bron, France; 1990, 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• .Cernicchi A, Galvanetto U, Iannucci L. Virtual modelling of safety helmets: practical problems. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13:451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2006, Livermore, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande V, Fleck N. Multi-axial yield behaviour of polymer foams. Acta Mater. 2001;49:1859–1866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande V, Fleck N. Isotropic constitutive models for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solids. 2000;48:1253–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusholtz GS, Bilkhu S, Founas M, et al. Impact response of foam: the effect of the state of stress, In: Proceedings of the 40th Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1996, New Mexico, USA, 95–121.
   Google Scholar
• Matzenmiller A, Lubliner J, Taylor R. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater. 1995;20:125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan P, Park CK, Marzougui D, et al. LSTC/NCAC dummy model development. In: Proceedings of the 11th International LS-DYNA Users Conference; Dearborn, (MI); 2010, 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn B, Canaple B, Derler S, et al. COST 327 motorcycle safety helmets. European Commission, Directorate General for Energy And transport, Brussels, Belgium; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi I, Golnaraghi F, Wang GG. Factors influencing the oblique impact test of motorcycle helmets. Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:404–408. PMID: 25023929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills NJ, Wilkes S, Derler S, et al. FEA of oblique impact tests on a motorcycle helmet. Int J Impact Eng. 2009;36:913–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA keyword users manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation; 2007, LIvermore, USA.
   Google Scholar
• UN ECE 22.05. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of protective helmets and their visors for drivers and passengers of motor cycles and mopeds. United Nations; Geneva, Switzerland; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Padgaonkar AJ, Krieger K, King A. Measurement of angular acceleration of a rigid body using linear accelerometers. J Appl Mech. 1975;42:552–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.T.I.S. Comm. Instrumentation for impact test-part 1-electronic instrumentation (J211/1). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiven S. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:81–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleiven S, Hardy W. Correlation of an FE model of the human head with experiments on localized motion of the brain – consequences for injury prediction. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:123–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleiven S, von Holst H. Consequences of head size following trauma to the human head. J Biomech. 2002;35:153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Vorst M, Chan P, Zhang J, et al. A new biomechanically-based criterion for lateral skull fracture. In: 48th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; Key Biscayne;2004. p. 181–195, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Vorst M, Stuhmiller J, Ho K, et al. Statistically and biomechanically based criterion for impact-induced skull fracture. In: 47th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; Lisbon, Portugal; 2003, 363–381.
   Google Scholar
• Chan P, Lu Z, Rigby P, et al. Development of generalized linear skull fracture criterion. In: 20th International Technical Conference on the Enchanced Safety of Vehicles; Lyon, France; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ghajari M, Galvanetto U, Iannucci L, et al. Influence of the body on the response of the helmeted head during impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 2011;16:285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist A, Mills NJ. Modelling of the impact response of motorcycle helmets. Int J Impact Eng. 1994;15:201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorn DR, Hurt Jr Jr HH, Smith TA. Motorcycle helmet test headform and test apparatus comparison. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles; 1998. p. 2310–2322, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fahlstedt M, Halldin P, Alvarez VS, et al. Influence of the body and neck on head kinematics and brain injury risk in bicycle accident situations. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference, Spain; 2016. p. 459–478.
   Google Scholar
• Delye H, Verschueren P, Depreitere B, et al. Biomechanics of frontal skull fracture. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1576–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Sances JA, et al. Biomechanics of skull fracture. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Banerjee A. Survival analysis-based human head injury risk curves: focus on skull fracture. J Neurotrauma. 2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Biomechanics of temporo-parietal skull fracture. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Tomei G, et al. Directional dependence of axonal brain injury due to centroidal and non-centroidal acceleration. In: Proceedings of 31st Stapp Car Crash Conference; 1987, New Orleans, USA, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiven S. Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int J Crashworthiness. 2006;11:65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy WN, Mason MJ, Foster CD, et al. A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J. 2007;51:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardy W, Foster C, Mason M, et al. Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar x-ray. Stapp Car Crash J. 2001;45:337–368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghajari M, Peldschus S, Galvanetto U, et al. Effects of the presence of the body in helmet oblique impacts. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdet N, Mojumder S, Piantini S, et al. Proposal of a new motorcycle helmet test method for tangential impact. In: Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference; 2016, Malaga, Spain, 479–489.
   Google Scholar