1,655
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Relevance analysis of AEB control strategy and occupant kinematics based on typical cut-in scenario

, , , &
Pages 198-205 | Received 21 Jan 2020, Accepted 13 Jun 2020, Published online: 20 Jul 2020

References

  • World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2018: summary. Available from: https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/ (accessed December 2018)
  • Hao L, Heng W, Ting Z, et al. Fine-tuning ADAS algorithm parameters for optimizing traffic safety and mobility in connected vehicle environment. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2017;76:132–149.
  • Cao L, Song Z, Ouyang Z, et al. Protection performance analysis and robustness optimization for integrated active and passive seat belt. J Hunan Univ (Nat Sci). 2018;45(10):59–68.
  • Zhu X, Zhang J, Ma Z. Analysis of driver initial brake time in safety cut-in scenario. China J Highw Transp. 2019;32(6):262–273, 318.
  • Chen L, Luo Y, Kong W, et al. Occupant injury model for evaluating intelligent driving systems. China J Highw Transp. 2019;32(6):198–205.
  • Zhang RF, Cao LB, Bao S, et al. A method for connected vehicle trajectory prediction and collision warning algorithm based on V2V communication. Int J Crashworthiness. 2017;22(1):15–25.
  • McCarthy M, Lange D. A generic evaluation methodoloy for advanced safety systems. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13(6):599–607.
  • Li G, Eben Li S, Cheng B. Field operational test of advanced driver assistance systems in typical Chinese road conditions: the influence of driver gender, age and aggression. Int J Automot Technol. 2015;16(5):739–750.
  • Kirschbichler S, Huber P, Prüggler A, et al. Factors influencing occupant kinematics during braking and lane change maneuvers in a passenger vehicle. In the IRCOBI conference; 2014. Berlin, Germany.
  • Gietelink O, Ploeg J, De Schutter B, et al. Development of advanced driver assistance systems with vehicle hardware-in-the-loop simulations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(7):569–590.
  • Woitsch G, Sinz W. Influences of pre-crash braking induced dummy – forward displacements on dummy behaviour during EuroNCAP frontal crashtest. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;62:268–275.
  • Duan J, Li R, Hou L, et al. Driver braking behavior analysis to improve autonomous emergency braking systems in typical Chinese vehicle-bicycle conflicts. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;108:74–82.
  • Kitagawa Y, Okumura Y, Yamada K. Effectiveness of automatic emergency braking in simulated traffic accident scenarios. In the IRCOBI conference; 2019. Florence, Italy.
  • Bastien C, Blundell MV, Neal-Sturgess C. A study into the kinematic response for unbelted human occupants during emergency braking. Int J Crashworthiness. 2017;22(6):689–703.
  • Meijer R, Rodarius C, Adamec J, et al. A first step in computer modelling of the active human response in a far-side impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 2008;13(6):643–652.
  • Rooij L, Pauwelussen J, Camp O, et al. Driver head displacement during (automatic) vehicle braking tests with varying levels of distraction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ESV-Conference; 2013. Seoul, Korea.
  • Bose D, Crandall JR, Untaroiu CD, et al. Influence of pre-collision occupant parameters on injury outcome in a frontal collision. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(4):1398–1407.
  • Huang L, Wang Y, Yang C, et al. Application of Kinovea software in speed calculation of video image. Highw Traffic Technol (Appl Technol). 2015;11(08):210–212.
  • Hu Y, Zhu H, Zeng X, et al. Analysis of the effect of active retractor parameters on occupant kinematic under braking condition.Automot Eng. 2020;42(05):615-620.
  • Beeman SM, Kemper AR, Madigan ML, et al. Kinetic and kinematic responses of post mortem human surrogates and the hybrid III ATD in high-speed frontal sled tests. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;55:34–47.
  • Mages M, Seyffert M. Analysis of the pre-crash benefit of reversible belt prepretensioning in different accident scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 22th ESV-Conference; 2011. Washington, DC.
  • Yu Y, Jing H, Fan L, et al. Investigation of the effect of neck muscle active force on whiplash injury of the cervical spine. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018;2018:1–10.
  • Pithioux M, Chavet P, St-Onge N, et al. Influence of muscle preactivation of the lower limb on impact dynamics in the case of frontal collision. Int J Crashworthiness. 2005;10(6):557–565.
  • Hill AV. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 1938;126(843):136–195.
  • Yamaguchi GT, Sawa AGU, Moran DW, et al. A survey of human musculotendon actuator parameters. In: Winters J.M., Woo S.L.Y. editors. Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization. Berlin (Germany): Springer; 1990. p. 717–773.
  • Winters JM, Stark L. Estimated mechanical properties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. J Biomech. 1988;21(12):1027–1041.
  • Meijer R, Hassel E, Broos J, et al. Development of a multi-body human model that predicts active and passive human behavior. In the IRCOBI conference; 2012. Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2012;13(4):1546–1555.
  • Bogenrieder R, Fehring M, Bachmann R, et al. Pre-Safe® in rear-end collision situations. In: Proceedings of the 21rd ESV-Conference; 2009. Stuttgart, Germany.
  • Zhuang J. Automotive electronic control system engineering. Beijing (China): Beijing Institute of Technology Press; 1998. p. 30–148.