How does the driver reaction behavior affect the safety benefit of intelligent safety systems?

References

• Girbes V, Armesto L, Dols J, et al. Haptic feedback to assist bus drivers for pedestrian safety at low speed. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2016;9(3):345–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan H, Sun X, Gordon T. Unified decision-making and control for highway collision avoidance using active front steer and individual wheel torque control. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(8):1188–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panou MC. Intelligent personalized ADAS warnings. European Trans Res Rev. 2018;10(2):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchino JB. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;99(Pt A):142–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fildes B, Keall M, Bos N, et al. Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2015;81:24–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khayyat M, Arrigoni S, Cheli F. Development and simulation-based testing of a 5G-Connected intersection AEB system. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021;1–20. arXiv preprint arXiv:210201590.
   Google Scholar
• Den Camp OO, van Montfort S, Uittenbogaard J, et al. Cyclist target and test setup for evaluation of cyclist-autonomous emergency braking. IntJ Automot Technol. 2017;18(6):1085–1097.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson-Hellman I, Lindman M. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(sup1):42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS. Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(3):732–740.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chajmowicz H, Saadé J, Cuny S. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(Suppl 2):S20–S25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujiwara T, Takechi K. Making the world safer: autonomous emergency braking systems enhance safety for senior drivers. Appl Eco Lett. 2021;1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1917760
   Google Scholar
• Decker JA, Haus SH, Sherony R, et al. Potential benefits of Animal-Detecting automatic emergency braking systems based on US driving data. Trans Res Record. 2021;2675(10):678–688.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Abdel-Aty M, Park J, et al. Effects of crash warning systems on rear-end crash avoidance behavior under fog conditions. Trans Res Part C Emerging Tech. 2018;95:481–492.
   Google Scholar
• Reagan IJ, McCartt AT. Observed activation status of lane departure warning and forward collision warning of honda vehicles at dealership service centers. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(8):827–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno M, Fabrigoule C, Ndiaye D, et al. Behavioural adaptation and effectiveness of a forward collision warning system depending on a secondary cognitive task. Trans Res Part F Traffic Psych Behaviour. 2014;24:158–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. editors. Potential occupant injury reduction in pre-crash system equipped vehicles in the striking vehicle of rear-end crashes. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine/Annual Scientific Conference; 2010. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Kim E-S, Min S-K, Sung D-H, et al. editors. The AEB system with active and passive safety integration for reducing occupants' injuries in High-Velocity region. 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bärgman J, Boda C-N, Dozza M. Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: the effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;102:165–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rear-end collisions. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst. 2012;13(4):1546–1555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin SB, Hankey JM, Dingus TA. A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40(1):8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppsson H, Lubbe N. Simulating automated emergency braking with and without torricelli vacuum emergency braking for cyclists: effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;142:105538.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scanlon JM, Kusano KD, Daniel T, et al. Waymo simulated driving behavior in reconstructed fatal crashes within an autonomous vehicle operating domain. Accident Anal Prev. 2021;163:106454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Ito D, Mizuno K. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(1):100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Char F, Serre T. Analysis of pre-crash characteristics of passenger car to cyclist accidents for the development of advanced drivers assistance systems. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;136:105408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Char F, Serre T, Compigne S, et al. Car-to-cyclist forward collision warning effectiveness evaluation: a parametric analysis on reconstructed real accident cases. Int J Crashworthiness. 2022;27(1):34–10.
   Google Scholar
• Seacrist T, Douglas EC, Graci V, et al. editors. Evaluation of AEB effectiveness using counterfactual simulations of SHRP2 naturalistic crashes. 26th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV): Technology: Enabling a Safer TomorrowNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Chen Y, Bostrom O, et al. A comparison study of car-to-pedestrian and car-to-E-bike accidents: data source: the China in-depth accident study (CIDAS) SAE Technical Paper, 2014. 0148–7191.
   Google Scholar
• LÜ K LX, Han T, Qiao J, et al. AEB control strategy based on driving style recognition. Automobile Tech. 2021;2020(5):16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Markkula G, Engström J, Lodin J, et al. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;95(Pt A):209–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seiler P, Song B, Hedrick JK. Development of a collision avoidance system. SAE Trans. 1998;109:1334–1340.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Zidan FM, Eid HO. Factors affecting injury severity of vehicle occupants following road traffic collisions. Injury. 2015;46(1):136–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Y, Yan X. The impacts of warning release time and speed limit on driving behaviour and Pedestrian-Vehicle collision rate on side-parking road. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;638(1):012034.
   Google Scholar
• Wood JS, Zhang S. Evaluating relationships between perception-reaction times, emergency deceleration rates, and crash outcomes using naturalistic driving data. Trans Res Record. 2021;2675(1):213–223.
   Google Scholar
• Haus SH, Sherony R, Gabler HC. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States. Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S171–S176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue L, Abdel-Aty M, Wu Y, et al. Effects of forward collision warning technology in different pre-crash scenarios. Trans Res Part F Traffic Psych Behaviour. 2021;76:336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powelleit M, Vollrath M. Situational influences on response time and maneuver choice: development of time-critical scenarios. Accid Anal Prev. 2019;122:48–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Hou L, Wang Z, et al. Drivers' visual-distracted take-over performance model and its application on adaptive adjustment of time budget. Accid Anal Prev. 2021;154:106099.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang Z, Shi J, Zhang Y, et al. Head-up display graphic warning system facilitates simulated driving performance. Intern J Human Comp Inter. 2019;35(9):796–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelík J, Bobrov N, Nevolná Z. Parametrization of pedestrian injuries and its utilisation in proving traffic accidents course using injury signatures and contact signatures. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019;9(1):3–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandelík J, Bundzel M. Application of neural network in order to recognise individuality of course of vehicle and pedestrian body contacts during accidents. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019;24(2):221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrov N, Morochovič R, Mandelík J. Scope assessment of soft tissue injury within polytrauma for needs of fortis system injury classification. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2021;11(3):315–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandelík J, Bobrov N. Parametrization of injuries by the FORTIS system and its utilisation at solving traffic accidents with pedestrians by the police. American Acad Sci Res J Engng Tech Sci. 2017;36(1):294–305.
   Google Scholar