Predictive analysis of injury severity of person across angle crashes using machine learning models

References

• U. S. D. of Transportation, National highway traffic safety administration fatality analysis and reporting system @ONLINE [Dec. 2018]. Available from https://www.nhtsa.gov/content/nhtsa-ftp/176776.
   Google Scholar
• Laws M. H. U. Traffic Safety Facts.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi A, Jahangiri A, Berardi V, et al. Crash severity analysis of rear-end crashes in California using statistical and machine learning classification methods. J Transport Safe Secure. 2020;12(4):522–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezapour M, Farid A, Nazneen S, et al. Using machine leaning techniques for evaluation of motorcycle injury severity. IATSS Res. 2020;45(3):277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani RG, Selvaraj SA. Pragmatic approach for refined feature selection for the prediction of road accident severity. SIC. 2014;23(1):41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Shanthi S, Ramani RG. Vehicle safety device (airbag) specific classification of road traffic accident patterns through data mining techniques. In: Advances in computing and information technology. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer; 2013. pp. 433–443.
   Google Scholar
• Shanthi S, Ramani RG. Classification of vehicle collision patterns in road accidents using data mining algorithms. Int J Comput Appl. 2011;35(12):30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelwahab HT, Abdel-Aty MA. Development of artificial neural network models to predict driver injury severity in traffic accidents at signalized intersections. Transp Res Rec. 2001;1746(1):6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty M. Analysis of driver injury severity levels at multiple locations using ordered probit models. J Safety Res. 2003;34(5):597–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aty M, Abdelwahab H. Analysis and prediction of traffic fatalities resulting from angle collisions including the effect of vehicles’ configuration and compatibility. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36(3):457–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong M, Abraham A, Paprzycki M. Traffic accident analysis using machine learning paradigms. Informatica.2005;29(2005):89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sameen MI, Pradhan B. Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks. Appl. Sci. 2017;7(6):476.
   Google Scholar
• Arhin SA, Gatiba A. Predicting crash injury severity at unsignalized intersections using support vector machines and naïve bayes classifiers. Transport Safe Environ. 2020;2(2):120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hou S, Tan W, Zheng Y, et al. Optimization design of corrugated beam guardrail based on RBF-MQ surrogate model and collision safety consideration. Adv Eng Softw. 2014;78:28–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkweather J, Moske AK. 2011. Multinomial logistic regression.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L. Extremely randomized trees. Mach Learn. 2006;63(1):3–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 2001;29(5):1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Guestrin C. 2016. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, August, p. 785–794.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M, Liu Q, Chen S, et al. XGBoost-based algorithm interpretation and application on post-fault transient stability status prediction of power system. IEEE Access. 2019;7:13149–13158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez P. (Ed.). 2018. Smart wheelchairs and brain-computer interfaces: mobile assistive technologies. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure. 1960;20(1):37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. )
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal A, Umer W. Exploring the injury severity risk factors in fatal crashes with neural network. IJERPH. 2020;17(20):7466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Zheng L, Han C, et al. Traffic incident clearance time prediction and influencing factor analysis using extreme gradient boosting model. J Adv Transp. 2020;2020:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsa AB, Movahedi A, Taghipour H, et al. Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;136:105405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadhwani D, Thakor D. Prediction of extent of damage in vehicle during crash using improved XGBoost model. Paper Accepted in International Journal of Crashworthiness.
   Google Scholar
• Kidando E, Kitali AE, Kutela B, et al. Prediction of vehicle occupants injury at signalized intersections using real-time traffic and signal data. Accid Anal Prev. 2021;149:105869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer J, Sarigiannis D, Parnell T. 2019. Learning to tune XGBoost with XGBoost. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.07218.
   Google Scholar
• Yucong W, Bo W. Research on EA-xgboost hybrid model for building energy prediction. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020;1518(1):012082.
   Google Scholar
• Panicker AK, Ramadurai G. Injury severity prediction model for two-wheeler crashes at mid-block road sections. Int J Crashworthiness. 2022;27(2):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab L, Jiang H. Severity prediction of motorcycle crashes with machine learning methods. Int J Crashworthiness. 2020;25(5):485–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assi K, Rahman SM, Mansoor U, et al. Predicting crash injury severity with machine learning algorithm synergized with clustering technique: a promising protocol. IJERPH. 2020;17(15):5497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Liu P, Wang W, et al. Using support vector machine models for crash injury severity analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;45:478–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis DD. 1998. Naive (bayes) at forty: the independence assumption in information retrieval. In European conference on machine learning. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer, pp. 4–15.
   Google Scholar