Design and evaluation of compressive properties of 3D-printed PLA stochastic open-cell foam

References

• Bouchahdane K, Ouelaa N, Belaadi A. Static and fatigue compression behaviour of conventional and auxetic open-cell foam. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2022;29(27):6154–6167. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1972496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey C, Thorat M, Sahu SN, et al. Evaluation of optimum foam density for effective design of blast absorbers. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2022;29(3):400–407. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1772416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama A, Suetsugu D, Fukubayashi Y, et al. Experimental study on the dynamic properties of rigid polyurethane foam in stress-controlled cyclic uniaxial tests. Constr Build Mater. 2022;321:126377. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W-Y, Matsumoto R, Utsunomiya H. Deformation and density change of open-cell nickel foam in compression test. Mater Trans. 2017;58(10):1373–1378. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.L-M2017829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez BJ, Gupta V. Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of open-cell polyurea foams. J Dyn Behav Mater. 2019;5(2):132–142. doi: 10.1007/s40870-019-00192-0.
   Google Scholar
• Changyun L, Pengfei C, Guofa M. Effect of base materials and pore grades on mechanical properties of open-cell aluminum foam fabricated by investment casting. Ferroelectrics. 2022;596(1):95–106. doi: 10.1080/00150193.2022.2087252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueger Z, Lakes RS. Experimental cosserat elasticity in open-cell polymer foam. Philos Mag. 2016;96(2):93–111. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2015.1125541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmins M, Mitschang P. Bending properties of structural foams manufactured in a hot press process. Adv Manuf Polym Compos Sci. 2022;8(3):117–133. doi: 10.1080/20550340.2022.2077277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesenjak M, Sulong MA, Krstulovíc-Opara L, et al. Dynamic compression of aluminum foam derived from infiltration casting of salt dough. Mech Mater. 2016;93:96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajizadeh M, Yazdani M, Vesali S, et al. An experimental investigation into the quasi-static compression behavior of open-cell aluminum foams focusing on controlling the space holder particle size. J Manuf Process. 2021;70:193–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Xue Y, Wang X, et al. Effect of cross sectional shape of struts on the mechanical properties of aluminum based pyramidal lattice structures. Mater Lett. 2017;202:55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathaiah S, Dubey R, Pandey A, et al. Effect of spherical and cubical space holders on the microstructural characteristics and its consequences on mechanical and thermal properties of open-cell aluminum foam. Mater Chem Phys. 2021;273:125115. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazi A, Berke P, Ehab Moustafa Kamel K, et al. Multiscale computational modelling of closed cell metallic foams with detailed microstructural morphological control. Int J Eng Sci. 2019;143:92–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkebsi EAA, Outtas T, Almutawakel A, et al. Design of mechanically compatible lattice structures cancellous bone fabricated by fused filament fabrication of Z-ABS material. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2023;30(11):2269–2283. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2022.2053904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling C, Cernicchi A, Gilchrist MD, et al. Mechanical behaviour of additively-manufactured polymeric octet-truss lattice structures under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loading. Mater Des. 2019;162:106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Ding Y, Yu F, et al. Crushing behavior and deformation mechanism of additively manufactured voronoi-based random open-cell polymer foams. Mater Today Commun. 2020;25:101406. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelanconi M, Rezaei E, Ortona A. Cellular ceramic architectures produced by hybrid additive manufacturing: a review on the evolution of their design. J Ceram Soc Japan. 2020;128(9):595–604. doi: 10.2109/jcersj2.20071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong L, Kyriakides S, Jang W-Y. Compressive response of open-cell foams. Part I: morphology and elastic properties. Int J Solids Struct. 2005;42(5–6):1355–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensalem I, Benhizia A. Novel design of irregular closed-cell foams structures based on spherical particle inflation and evaluation of its compressive performance. Thin-Walled Struct. 2022;181:109991. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Grujovic N, Zivic F, et al. Influence of porosity on the mechanical behavior during uniaxial compressive testing on voronoi-based open-cell aluminium foam. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(7):1041. doi: 10.3390/ma12071041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang R, Liu J, et al. A numerical method for the ballistic performance prediction of the sandwiched open cell aluminum foam under hypervelocity impact. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2018;75:254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotomayor OE, Tippur HV. Role of cell regularity and relative density on elastoplastic compression response of 3-D open-cell foam core sandwich structure generated using voronoi diagrams. Acta Mater. 2014;78:301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billiet M, De Schampheleire S, Huisseune H, et al. Influence of orientation and radiative heat transfer on aluminum foams in Buoyancy-induced convection. Materials (Basel). 2015;8(10):6792–6805. doi: 10.3390/ma8105340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantini M, Curto M, De Crescenzio F. A method to design biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering based on voronoi lattices. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2016;11(2):77–90. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1172301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantini M, Curto M. Interactive design and manufacturing of a voronoi-based biomimetic bone scaffold for morphological characterization. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2018;12(2):585–596. doi: 10.1007/s12008-017-0416-x.
   Google Scholar
• Catmull E, Clark J. Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes. Comput-Aided Des. 1978;10(6):350–355. doi: 10.1016/0010-4485(78)90110-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Zheng Z, Zhu C, et al. Crushing and densification of rapid prototyping polylactide foam: meso-structural effect and a statistical constitutive model. Mech Mater. 2018;127:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movahedi N, Linul E. Quasi-static compressive behavior of the ex-situ aluminum-alloy foam-filled tubes under elevated temperature conditions. Mater Lett. 2017;206:182–184. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movahedi N, Linul E. Radial crushing response of ex-situ foam-filled tubes at elevated temperatures. Compos Struct. 2021;277:114634. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO13314. Mechanical testing of metals – ductility testing – compression test for porous and cellular metals. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Soni B, Biswas S. Evaluation of mechanical properties under quasi-static compression of open cell foams of 6061-T6 Al alloy fabricated by pressurized salt infiltration casting method. Mater Charact. 2017;130:198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing L, Su X, Yang F, et al. Compressive strain rate dependence and constitutive modeling of closed-cell aluminum foams with various relative densities. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(20):14739–14757. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2663-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Ma C, Xin D, et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities. J Mater Res. 2020;35(19):2575–2586. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2020.157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li QM, Magkiriadis I, Harrigan JJ. Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J Cell Plast. 2006;42(5):371–392. doi: 10.1177/0021955X06063519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Xue P, Chen Y, et al. Insight into cell size effects on quasi-static and dynamic compressive properties of 3D foams. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;636:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib FN, Iovenitti P, Masood SH, et al. Fabrication of polymeric lattice structures for optimum energy absorption using multi jet fusion technology. Mater Des. 2018;155:86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan Y, Du B, Shi X, Hou B, Li Y. Quasi-static and dynamic compressive properties and deformation mechanisms of 3D printed polymeric cellular structures with kelvin cells. Int J Impact Eng. 2019;132:103303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, Maire E, Chen X, Adrien J, Li Y, Amani Y, Hu L, Cheng Y. Compressive performance and deformation mechanism of the dynamic gas injection aluminum foams. Mater Char. 2019;147:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Huang J, Yuan Z. Effects of microstructure on uniaxial strength asymmetry of open-cell foams. Appl Math Mech-Engl Ed. 2015;36(1):37–46. doi: 10.1007/s10483-015-1893-9.
   Google Scholar