Edgewise compression behaviour of 3D woven honeycomb composites

References

• Usta F, Scarpa F, Türkmen HS. Edgewise compression of novel hexagonal hierarchical and asymmetric unit cells honeycomb metamaterials. Mater Today Commun. 2020;24:101102. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingrole A, Hao A, Liang R. Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement. Mater Des. 2017;117:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usta F, Ertaş OF, Ataalp A, et al. Impact behaviour of triggered and non-triggered crash tubes with auxetic lattices. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des. 2019; (2);119-127doi: 10.1007/s41939-018-00040-z.
   Google Scholar
• Usta F, Türkmen HS. Experimental and numerical investigation of impact behaviour of nested tubes with and without honeycomb filler. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;143:106256. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li QM, Mines RAW, Birch RS. The crush behaviour of rohacell-51WF structural foam. Int J Solids Struct. 2000;37(43):6321–6341. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00277-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva A, Kyriakides S. Compressive response and failure of balsa wood. Int J Solids Struct. 2007;44(25-26):8685–8717. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeves CA, Fleck NA. Material selection in sandwich beam construction. Scr Mater. 2004;50(10):1335–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbadi A, Koutsawa Y, Carmasol A, et al. Experimental and numerical characterization of honeycomb sandwich composite panels. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2009;17(10):1533–1547. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2009.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Zhou Z, Fan J, et al. Application of lock-in thermography for the inspection of disbonds in titanium alloy honeycomb sandwich structure. Infrared Phys Technol. 2017;81:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.infrared.2016.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcı O, Çoban O, Bora MÖ, et al. Experimental investigation of single and repeated impacts for repaired honeycomb sandwich structures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;682:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen OT. Sandwich materials for wind turbine blades - Present and future. Jnl of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2009;11(1):7–26. doi: 10.1177/1099636208099710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer TN. Honeycomb technology: materials, design, manufacturing, applications and testing. Springer Science & Business Media, 1997,Chapman & Hall,U.K. accessed 27 January 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyakrishnan PR, Chockalingam KKSK, Narayanasamy R. Studies on buckling behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;65(5-8):803–815. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4218-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, H. G. Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels: the commonwealth and international library: structures and solid body mechanics division. Elsevier. 2013, Pergamon Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Liang S, Chen HL. Investigation on the square cell honeycomb structures under axial loading. Compos Struct. 2006;72(4):446–454. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belouettar S, Abbadi A, Azari Z, et al. Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests. Compos Struct. 2009;87(3):265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joosten MW, Dutton S, Kelly D, et al. Experimental evaluation of the crush energy absorption of triggered composite sandwich panels under quasi-static edgewise compressive loading. Compos, A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010;41(9):1099–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimbs S, Middendorf P, Kilchert S, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of composite folded sandwich core structures under compression. Appl Compos Mater. 2007;14(5-6):363–377. doi: 10.1007/s10443-008-9051-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzzene M, Mazzarella L, Tsopelas P, et al. Wave propagation in sandwich plates with periodic auxetic core. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2002;13(9):587–597. doi: 10.1106/104538902031865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya U, Nelson S, Sinn B, et al. Processing and high strain rate impact response of multi-functional sandwich composites. Compos Struct. 2001;52(3-4):429–440. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00033-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya AS, Vaidya UK, Uddin N. Impact response of three-dimensional multifunctional sandwich composite. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;472(1-2):52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson LJ, Ashby Mf MFA. Cellular solids. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 1997. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139878326.
   Google Scholar
• Sun G, Huo X, Chen D, et al. Experimental and numerical study on honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and in-panel compression. Mater Des. 2017;133:154–168. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamalis AG, Manolakos DE, Ioannidis MB, et al. On the experimental investigation of crash energy absorption in laminate splaying collapse mode of FRP tubular components. Compos Struct. 2005;70(4):413–429. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminanda Y, Castanié B, Barrau JJ, et al. Experimental and numerical study of compression after impact of sandwich structures with metallic skins. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69(1):50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajdari A, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A. Dynamic crushing and energy absorption of regular, irregular and functionally graded cellular structures. Int J Solids Struct. 2011;48(3–4):506–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Lan Q, Zhong Y. Buckling analysis and experiment of fiber-paper honeycomb sandwich structure composites. AMR. 2011;314–316:566–570. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.314-316.566.
   Google Scholar
• Jayan VR, Tripathi L, Behera PK, et al. Prediction of internal geometry and tensile behaviour of 3D woven solid structures by mathematical coding. J Ind Text. 51, 2021;7034S-7055S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi L, Chowdhury S, Behera B. Modeling and simulation of impact behaviour of 3D woven solid structure for ballistic application. J Ind Text. 2020;51:6065S-6086S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera BK, Jain M, Tripathi L, et al. Low-Velocity impact behaviour of Textile-Reinforced composite sandwich panels. In Sandwich composites. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 2022;pp. 213–260.
   Google Scholar
• Atli-Veltin B. Effect of geometric parameters on the in-plane crushing behaviour of honeycombs and honeycombs with facesheets, https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/10177. 2009, accessed 13 March 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Li J. Analysis of the edgewise compression stability of adhesive-bonded honey comb sandwich structure. China Build Mater Sci Technol. 2011;30:31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mozafari H, Molatefi H, Crupi V, et al. In plane compressive response and crushing of foam filled aluminum honeycombs. J Compos Mater. 2015;49(26):3215–3228. doi: 10.1177/0021998314561069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi L, Neje G, Behera BK. Geometrical modeling of 3D woven honeycomb fabric for manufacturing of lightweight sandwich composite material. J Ind Text.2022; 51;4372S-4389S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi L, Behera BK. Flatwise compression behaviour of 3D woven honeycomb composites. J Ind Text. 2022;52:152808372211254. doi: 10.1177/15280837221125483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi L, Behera SK, Behera BK. Numerical modeling of flatwise energy absorption behaviour of 3D woven honeycomb composites with different cell structures. J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 2022;24(7):2047–2064. doi: 10.1177/10996362221122047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi L, Behera BK. Review: 3D woven honeycomb composites. J Mater Sci. 2021;56(28):15609–15652. doi: 10.1007/s10853-021-06302-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids. Cambridge University Press,U.K. 1997. .
   Google Scholar