Nutrient risk assessment in a decision theoretic context

References

• Editorial. Nature Reviews: Drug Discov 2006; 5: 3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry S. M., Berry D. A., Natarajan K., Lin C. S., Hennekens C. H., Belder R. Bayesian survival analysis with nonproportional hazards: meta‐analysis of combination pravastatin‐aspirin. J Am Stat Assoc 2004; 99: 36–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards W., Lindman H., Savage L. J. Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychol Rev 1963; 70: 193–242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry D. A. Statistics: a Bayesian perspective. Duxbury, California 1996
   Google Scholar
• Hickey S., Roberts H. Ascorbate: the science of vitamin C. Lulu Press, Morrisville, NC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Codex procedural manual. 44, 15th ed. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rome, Italy
   Google Scholar
• Hattis D., Baird S., Goble R. A straw man proposal for a quantitative definition of the RfD. Drug Chem Toxicol 2002; 25((4))403–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiero L. Environmental risk analysis: a review of public policy issues., Congressional Report Services, 98‐618 ENR, 15 July 1998
   Google Scholar
• Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC), Discussion paper on the guideline levels for methylmercury in fish, CX/FAC 06/38/37, Thirty‐eighth Session, The Hague, the Netherlands, 24–28 April 2006
   Google Scholar
• Codex Committee on Food Additives and Contaminants (CCFAC), Discussion paper on the application of risk analysis to the work of the Codex committee on nutrition and foods for special dietary uses, CX/NFSDU 06/28/9, Twenty‐eighth Session, Thailand, 28 September 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hill A. B. The environment and disease: association or causation?. Proc R Soc Med 1965; 58: 295–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein A., Aronow L., Kalman S. M. Principles of drug action. John Wiley and Son, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann E. L. Some principles of the theory of testing hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 1950; 21: 1–26
   Google Scholar
• Lee S., Meeden G. A minimal complete class theorem for decision problems where the parameter space contains only finitely many points. Metrika 1994; 41((1))227–32
   Google Scholar
• Savage L. J. The foundations of statistics. Dover, New York 1972, 2nd rev ed
   Google Scholar
• Lauder L. J. Bayesian methods in health technology: assessment—the case of clinical trials. July 2000, International Chinese Statistical Association Bulletin
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Toxicology. National Research Council Review of Acute Human‐Toxicity Estimates for Selected Chemical‐Warfare Agents. National Academies Press. 1997, Commission on Life Sciences, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky A. Cumulative lognormal distributions of dose‐response vs. dose distributions. 14–19 May 2000, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, Hiroshima, Japan
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky A. Cumulative lognormal distributions of dose‐response vs. dose distributions. 4–8 November 2001, Proceedings of the 47th Annual Conference on Bioassay, Analytical and Environmental Radiochemistry, Honolulu, Hawaii
   Google Scholar
• Maurer W. Creative and innovative statistics in clinical research and development. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44((4))551–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey S., Roberts H. Ridiculous dietary allowance. Lulu Press, MorrisvilleNC 2004
   Google Scholar
• Hickey S., Roberts H. Misleading information on the properties of vitamin C. PLoS Med 2005; 2((9))e307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds. Doubleday, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Parsons S., Wooldridge M. Game theory and decision theory in multi‐agent systems. J Autonomous Agents Multi‐Agent Syst 2002; 5((3))243–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes C. C. Agents in a nutshell‐a very brief introduction. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 1999; 11((1))127–32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs A. An economic theory of democracy. Harper, New York 1957
   Google Scholar
• Schafer J. L., Olsen M. K. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing‐data problems: a data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behav Res 1998; 33((4))545–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer J. L. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8((1))3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar