Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses of Normal Subjects to Selected Meals Commonly Consumed in the Middle East

References

• Jenkins DJA, W olever TM S, K alm usky J, et al. Low-glycem ic index diet in hyperlipidemia: use of tradition al starchy foods. Am J Clin N utr 1987; 46: 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins DJA, Thorne MJ, Taylor RH, et al. Effect of modifyin g the rate of digestion of a food on the blood glucose, am ino acid, and endocrine responses in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1987; 82: 223–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thom as D E, Brotherhood JR, Miller JB. Plasma glucose levels after prolonged strenuous exercise correlate inversely w ith glycemic response to food consumed before exercise. Int J Sport Nutr 1994; 4: 361–73.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle EE. Substrate utilization during exercise in active people. A m J Clin Nutr 1995; 61(suppl): 968S-79S.
   Google Scholar
• W olever TM S, Jenkins DJA, Vuksan V, et al. Bene®cial effects of low glycemic index diet in overweight NIDD M subjects. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 562–4.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansen K, Rasmussen O, Arnfred J, et al. G lycem ic effects of spaghetti and potato consumed as part of m ixed m eal on ID DM patients. Diabetes Care 1987; 10: 401–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JaÈrvi AE, K arlstroÈ m BE, G ranfeldt YE, et al. The in¯uence of food structure on postprandial m etabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes m ellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 61: 837–42.
   Google Scholar
• Coulston A M, Hollenbeck CB, Liu G C, et al. Effect of source of dietary carbohydrate on plasma glucose, insulin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide responses to test meals in subjects with non-insulin dependent diabetes m ellitus. Am J Clin N utr 1984; 10: 965–70.
   Google Scholar
• Chew I, Brand JC, Thorburn AW, et al. Application of glycem ic index to m ixed meals. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 47: 53–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand JC, N icholson PL, Thorburn A W, et al. Food processing and the glycemic index. A m J Clin Nutr 1985; 42: 1192–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne MJ, Thom pson LU, Jenkins DJA. Factors affecting starch digestibility and the glycem ic response w ith special reference to legum es. Am J Clin N utr 1983; 38: 481–8.
   Google Scholar
• Crapo PA, Insel J, Sperling M, et al. Comparison of serum glucose, insulin and glucagon responses to different types of complex carbohydrate in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 184–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon MC, Nuttall FQ, Neil BJ, et al. The insulin and glucose responses to m eals of glucose plus various proteins in type II diabetic subjects. Metabolism 1988; 37: 1081–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttall FQ, Gannon MC. Metabolic response to egg white and cottage cheese protein in norm al subjects. Metabolism 1990; 39: 749–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bornet FRJ, Costagliola D, Rizkalla SW J, et al. Insulinemic and glycem ic indexes of six starch rich foods taken alone and in a m ixed m eal by type 2 diabetics. A m J Clin Nutr 1987; 45: 588–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sud S, Siddhu A, Bijlani RL, et al. Nutrient composition is a poor determinant of the glycem ic response. Br J Nutr 1988; 59: 5–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Indar-Brown K, N orenberg C, Madar Z. G lycem ic and insulinemic responses after ingestion of ethnic foods by NIDD M and healthy subjects. A m J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Pellet PL, Shadarevian S. Food Com position Tables for use in the Middle East, 2nd edn. Beruit: Am erican University of Beirut, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• W olever TM S, Jenkins D JA, Jenkins AL, et al. The glycem ic index m ethodology and clinical implications. A m J Clin N utr 1991; 54: 846–54.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins DJA, W olever TM S, Taylor RH, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin N utr 1981; 34: 362–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins DJA, W olever TM S, Jenkins A L, et al. The glycem ic index of foods tested in diabetic patients: a new basis for carbohydrate exchange favoring the use of legum es. Diabetologia 1983; 24: 257–64.
   Google Scholar
• W olever TMS, Jenkins DJA. The use of the glycemic index in predicting the blood glucose response to m ixed meals. Am J Clin Nutr 1986; 43: 167–72.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins D JA, W esson V, W olever TM S, et al. W holemeal versus whole grain breads: proportio n of whole or cracked grain and the glycaemic response. BMJ 1988; 297: 958–60.
   Google Scholar
• W olever TM S, N uttall FQ, Lee R, et al. Prediction of the relative blood glucose response of m ixed m eals using the white bread glycem ic index. Diabetes Care 1985; 8: 418–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bornet FRJ, Fontvieille AM, Rizkalla S, et al. Insulin and glycem ic responses in healthy hum ans to native starches processed in different ways: correlation w ith in vitro a-am ylase hydrolysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 50: 315–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins DJA, W olever TM S, Jenkins AL, et al. Low glycem ic response to tradition ally processed wheat and rye products: bulgur and pumpernickel bread. A m J Clin Nutr 1986; 43: 516–20.
   Google Scholar
• W olever TM S. Relationship between dietary ®bre content and com position in foods and the glycem ic index. Am J Clin N utr 1990; 51: 72–5.
   Google Scholar
• Nishim une T, Yakushiji T, Sumim oto T, et al. G lycem ic response and ®bre content of some foods. Am J Clin N utr 1991; 54: 414–19.
   Google Scholar
• Van Am elsvoort JMM, W eststrate JA. Am ylose-A mylopectin ratio in a meal affects postprandial variables in male volunteers. Am J Clin N utr 1992; 55: 712–18.
   Google Scholar
• W elch McL, Bruce C, Hill SE, et al. Duodenal and ileal lipid suppresses postprandial blood glucose and insulin responses in m an: possible implications for the dietary m anagement of diabetes m ellitus. Clin Sci 1987; 72: 209–16.
   Google Scholar
• Habib C. D ietary Fiber Content of Selected Middle Eastern Dishes. MSc thesis, Am erican University of Beirut, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Behall KM, Schol®eld DJ, Yuhaniak I, et al. Diets containing high amylose vs. amylopectin starch: effects on m etabolic variables in hum an subjects. A m J Clin Nutr 1989; 49: 337–44.
   Google Scholar
• W olever TM S. Second-m eal effect: low-glycemic-index foods care at dinner im prove subsequent breakfast glycem ic response. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48: 1041–7.
   Google Scholar