When Is a Peer Review Journal Not a Peer Review Journal?

References

• Eaton K K. Peer review. J Nutr Med 1994; 4: 121–2.
   Google Scholar
• Downing D. Peer review (editorial). J Nutr Med 1994; 4: 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bagenal FS, Chilvers C, Easton D. Survival of patients w ith breast cancer attending the Bristol Cancer Self Help Centre. Lancet 1990; 336: 606–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom pson R. Bristol Cancer Self Help Centre: setting the record straight. J N utr Med 1991; 2: 317–19.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. American cademy of A llergy: position statementsÐ controversial techniques. J Allergy Clin Im munol 1981; 67: 331–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Statement on cytotoxic testing for food allergy (Bryan’s test). Bull N Y Acad Med 1988; 64: 117–19.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians’ Comm ittee on Clinical Imm unology and A llergy. Allergy: Conventional and Alternative Concepts. London: The Royal College of Physicians, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Lessof MH, Gray JR, Hofffenb erg R. Food intolerance and food aversion. A joint report of the Royal College of Physicians and the British N utritional Foundation. J R Coll Phys London 1984; 18: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh MN. Initial m anifestation of hypersensitivity. In: de W eck AL, Sam pson NA, eds. Intestinal Im munology and Food Allergy. N ew York: Avon, 1995; pp. 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony HM, Birtwistle S, Brostoff J. Effectiv e Allergy Practice. A D ocum ent on Standards of Care and Management for the Allergy Patient. Southampton: British Society for A llergy and Environ mental Medicine w ith the British Society for Nutrition al Medicine, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Downing D, D avies S. `Allergy: conventional and alternative concepts’. A critique of the Royal College of Physicians of London’ s report. J Nutr Med 1992; 3: 331–49.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Pathologists. G ood A llergy Practice. Standards of Care for Providers and Purchasers of Allergy Services within the National H ealth Service. London: Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Pathologists, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Guidelines for management of asthma in adults: IÐ chronic persistent asthma. Statem ent by the British Thoracic Society, Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians of London, K ing’s Fund Centre, National A sthm a Campaign. Br Med J 1990; 301: 651–3.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer AL, Bousquet J, Busse W W. International consensus report on diagnosis and managem ent of asthma. International Asthm a Management Project. Clin Exp Allergy 1992; 22 (suppl.): 1–72.
   Google Scholar
• O’Byrne PM. Treatm ent of m ild asthma. Lancet 1997; 349: 818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malling H-J, ed. Imm unotherapy position paper. Allergy 1988; 43 (suppl.): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Malling H-J, W eeke B, eds Imm unotherapy. Allergy 1993; 48 (suppl.): 9–35.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Position paper on allergen imm unotherapy. Clin Exp All 1993; 23 (suppl.): 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Frew A J. Conventional and alternative allergen im munotherapy: do they work? are they safe? Clin Exp All 1994; 24: 416–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anthony HM, Birtw istle S, Eaton KK, Maberly J. Environm ental Medicine in Clinical Practice. Southam pton: BSAEN M Publications, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• AA AI Training Program Directors Comm ittee. Topics related to controversial practices that should be taught in an allergy and im munology training program. J A llergy Clin Imm unol 1994; 93: 955–66.
   Google Scholar
• Dreborg S, Frew A. Allergen standardisation and skin tests. Allergy 1993; 48 (suppl.): 48–82.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton KK, Birtwistle S, Anthony H M. Effectiv e allergy training. J Nutr Environ Med 1995; 5: 417–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jewett D L, Fein G, G reenberg MH. A double blind study of symptom provocation to determ ine food sensitivity. New Engl J Med 1990; 23: 429–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp D J. Provocation neutralisation therapy. Environ Med 1991; 8: 58.
   Google Scholar